Beyond Model Species: Advanced Strategies for Validating Plant Gene Function in Non-Model Organisms

Abstract

Validating gene function in non-model plants is crucial for crop improvement and discovering novel biomolecules but presents unique challenges due to limited genomic resources. This article provides a comprehensive guide for researchers and drug development professionals, covering the foundational principles of non-model plant genomics. It explores cutting-edge methodological pipelines like NEEDLE and EDGE, offers practical troubleshooting advice for experimental optimization, and details robust validation frameworks that integrate computational predictions with experimental evidence. By synthesizing recent advances in functional genomics, this resource aims to accelerate the reliable characterization of gene function in agriculturally and medically important plant species.

The Unique Challenges and Core Principles of Non-Model Plant Genomics

Why Non-Model Organisms? Bridging the Genomics Resource Gap in Plant Research

Model organisms like Arabidopsis thaliana have been fundamental to plant molecular biology, providing a simplified system for discovering core genetic and developmental mechanisms [1]. However, this very simplicity creates a significant knowledge gap, as these models cannot represent the vast functional diversity of the plant kingdom [2] [3]. Research into non-model organisms is crucial for understanding specialized traits—such as unique metabolic pathways, complex morphological adaptations, and specific environmental resistances—that are absent from conventional models [1] [4]. With advances in sequencing and genomic technologies, it is now increasingly feasible to bridge the genomics resource gap, moving beyond model systems to explore the full breadth of plant biology and apply these findings to crop improvement, conservation, and biotechnology [5] [2].

The Genomic Resource Gap: A Comparative Analysis

The table below summarizes the key distinctions between traditional model organisms and non-model organisms, highlighting the specific challenges and unique opportunities presented by non-model systems.

Table: Bridging the Gap Between Model and Non-Model Plant Organisms

Aspect	Traditional Model Organisms	Non-Model Organisms	Bridging the Gap: Solutions & Technologies
Genetic Tools	Extensive, well-established (e.g., mutant libraries, standardized transformation) [1]	Limited or non-existent; protocols often require development from scratch [6] [4]	Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS), CRISPR-Cas9 [7] [2] [6]
Genomic Resources	Complete, high-quality reference genomes and comprehensive databases [1] [2]	Often lacking a reference genome; limited sequence data [2] [3]	De novo genome assembly, RNA-Seq for gene discovery, EST databases [5] [6]
Research Cycle Time	Short life cycles (e.g., Arabidopsis ~6-8 weeks) enable rapid experimentation [1]	Often long life cycles (e.g., orchids taking 2-3 years to flower) slow research progress [6]	Gene silencing vectors (e.g., CymMV-based) to study gene function in weeks, not years [6]
Phenotypic Novelty	Limited to the biology of the model species [4]	Enormous diversity for studying evolution, ecology, and specialized traits [1] [3]	Comparative genomics and network analyses (e.g., NEEDLE pipeline) to identify key regulators [7]
Community & Infrastructure	Large research communities, stock centers, and consolidated funding [2]	Smaller, more collaborative communities; lack of central stock centers [4]	Development of shared bioinformatic tools and databases tailored for non-model plants [3]

Experimental Paradigms: From Gene Discovery to Validation

Bridging the genomics gap requires integrated workflows that combine modern computational tools with functional validation techniques adaptable to non-model species.

Computational Gene Discovery in Non-Model Plants

For species with limited genomic resources, co-expression network analysis is a powerful method to identify candidate genes regulating traits of interest. The NEEDLE (Network-Enabled gene Discovery pipeLinE) pipeline exemplifies this approach [7].

Table: Key Research Reagent Solutions for Functional Genomics

Reagent / Solution	Function / Application	Example in Non-Model Research
CymMV-Pro60 VIGS Vector	A viral vector derived from a symptomless Cymbidium mosaic virus strain used to transiently silence target genes in orchids [6].	Enabled functional study of B- and C-class MADS-box genes in Phalaenopsis orchids, causing clear morphological changes in flowers [6].
Next-Generation Sequencer (NGS)	Hardware for decoding plant DNA/RNA rapidly and accurately, generating the raw data for genome assembly or transcriptome analysis [5] [8].	Used for whole-genome sequencing of small cardamom, generating a draft genome and identifying over 250,000 SSR markers [5].
Bioinformatics Platforms	Software/cloud computing tools for analyzing, interpreting, and visualizing large-scale genetic data like sequence alignment and network analysis [7] [8].	The NEEDLE pipeline uses such tools to build co-expression networks from transcriptome data and pinpoint upstream transcription factors [7].
CRISPR-Cas9 System	A precise genome-editing technology that can be adapted to non-model organisms once basic genomic information is available [2].	Successfully implemented in diatoms (Thalassiosira pseudonana and Phaeodactylum tricornutum) for targeted gene knockouts [2].

Figure 1: NEEDLE Pipeline Workflow for Gene Discovery. This network-based computational pipeline identifies key transcriptional regulators from transcriptomic data, enabling gene discovery in non-model species [7].

Functional Validation: A Case Study on Orchid Flowering Genes

Studying the molecular basis of floral morphology in orchids is a prime example of overcoming a long life cycle (2-3 years to flower) through adapted functional genomics tools [6]. The following protocol details the use of Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS).

Experimental Protocol: VIGS for Functional Gene Validation in Orchids [6]

• Vector Construction:

  • Isolate a mild, symptomless strain of Cymbidium mosaic virus (CymMV).
  • Engineer an infectious cDNA clone (e.g., pCymMV-M1) containing a T3 promoter and a poly(A) tail.
  • Create the VIGS vector (e.g., pCymMV-pro60) by duplicating the viral coat protein (CP) subgenomic promoter to drive the expression of inserted target gene fragments.

• Insert Preparation and Cloning:

  • Amplify a unique, non-conserved fragment (e.g., 150 nucleotides) of the target gene (e.g., the MADS-box gene PeMADS6) from orchid cDNA.
  • Critical Note: Using a short, unique fragment ensures specific gene silencing. Using a longer, conserved fragment (e.g., 500 nt) can lead to the simultaneous silencing of multiple members of the same gene family.
  • Clone the target gene fragment into the pCymMV-pro60 vector.

• Plant Inoculation:

  • In vitro transcribe the recombinant plasmid to create infectious RNA transcripts.
  • Mechanically inoculate the transcripts onto the leaves of young Phalaenopsis plants.

• Monitoring and Analysis:

  • Allow 2-4 weeks for the virus to establish systemic infection and induce silencing.
  • Monitor plants for viral infection (e.g., via northern blot) and silencing efficacy.
  • Quantify the knockdown of the target gene mRNA using real-time RT-PCR.
  • Document phenotypic consequences (e.g., altered floral organ identity and morphology) in developing flowers.

Figure 2: VIGS Experimental Workflow. This method allows for rapid functional analysis of genes in non-model plants with long life cycles, such as orchids [6].

The strategic study of non-model organisms is not a niche pursuit but an essential pathway to a comprehensive understanding of plant biology. As genomic technologies continue to become more accessible and powerful, the resource gap that once made such research prohibitive is rapidly closing [5] [2] [8]. The integration of de novo sequencing, advanced bioinformatics, and adaptable functional tools like VIGS and CRISPR is democratizing functional genomics. By embracing the immense diversity of non-model plants, researchers can uncover novel genetic mechanisms, accelerate crop improvement, and ultimately address pressing global challenges in food security and environmental sustainability [5] [3].

For researchers studying non-model plant organisms, the scarcity of comprehensive multi-omics resources presents a significant bottleneck in gene discovery and functional validation. This guide compares two predominant strategy types—computational inference pipelines and targeted experimental validation methods—that enable initial gene discovery without relying on extensive pre-existing multi-omics datasets. Performance comparisons, based on experimental data from recent studies, highlight the contexts in which each strategy excels, providing a framework for scientists to select the optimal approach for their research goals and resource constraints.

Non-model plants, which constitute the vast majority of horticultural and crop species, lack the extensive multi-omics datasets and well-characterized genetic tools available for model organisms like Arabidopsis thaliana [9] [10]. This scarcity impedes the identification of key transcriptional regulators and functional genes controlling agronomically important traits. Traditional genetic transformation methods remain inefficient, costly, and heavily dependent on tissue culture, which is unavailable for many species [10]. Furthermore, genomic annotations for non-model organisms often contain persistent errors, such as chimeric gene mis-annotations, which complicate downstream analysis and functional validation [11]. This guide objectively evaluates and compares emerging strategies designed to overcome these limitations, enabling effective initial gene discovery with minimal multi-omics data requirements.

Comparative Performance Analysis of Gene Discovery Strategies

The table below summarizes the core performance metrics of two complementary strategies for initial gene discovery in non-model plants, based on recent experimental validations.

Table 1: Performance Comparison of Gene Discovery Strategies for Non-Model Plants

Strategy	Key Methodology	Validated Organisms	Transformation Efficiency	Key Advantages	Primary Limitations
NEEDLE Pipeline [7]	Network-based analysis of dynamic transcriptome data to infer upstream regulators.	Maize, Soybean, Brachypodium, Sorghum	Not Applicable (Computational)	Identifies key Transcription Factors (TFs) without prior multi-omics data; Rapid in planta validation; User-friendly.	Relies on availability of dynamic transcriptome datasets.
Non-Tissue Culture Transformation [10]	A. rhizogenes-mediated root transformation; Virus-mediated genome editing (e.g., TRV, CLBV).	Strawberry, Citrus, Tobacco (N. benthamiana)	Successful root transformation in strawberry and citrus; Efficient Pds gene editing in tobacco.	Bypasses complex tissue culture; Cost-effective and less time-consuming; Applicable to species resistant to tissue culture.	Primarily generates chimeric or non-germline edits; Limited to certain species/varieties.

Detailed Experimental Protocols and Workflows

NEEDLE Computational Pipeline Methodology

The NEEDLE (Network-Enabled gene Discovery pipeline) provides a systematic, network-based approach to identify key transcriptional regulators from dynamic transcriptome data, which is particularly valuable when other omics datasets are unavailable [7].

Experimental Protocol:

• Data Input: Collect RNA-seq data from a time-course experiment or multiple conditions relevant to the trait of interest (e.g., stress response, development).
• Network Module Generation: The pipeline systematically generates co-expression gene network modules from the dynamic transcriptome data.
• Connectivity and Hierarchy Analysis: NEEDLE measures gene connectivity within the network and establishes a network hierarchy to pinpoint key transcriptional regulators upstream of genes of interest.
• Validation: Candidates are rapidly validated in planta using techniques such as CRISPR/Cas9 or transient expression assays [7].

Workflow Diagram: NEEDLE Gene Discovery Pipeline

Non-Tissue Culture Transformation & Validation Methods

For functional validation of candidate genes in non-model plants, several methods bypass the need for inefficient and complex tissue culture systems.

A. Agrobacterium rhizogenes-Mediated Hairy Root Transformation [10] This method allows for rapid functional analysis of genes in root tissues.

Experimental Protocol:

• Strain Preparation: Culture A. rhizogenes (e.g., K599 strain) carrying the binary plasmid with the gene of interest (e.g., GFP reporter or genome editing components) until OD₆₀₀ reaches 1.0.
• Centrifugation and Resuspension: Pellet bacteria and resuspend in an infiltration solution.
• Plant Infiltration: Infiltrate the bacterial suspension into plant tissues (e.g., stems of citrus or strawberry).
• Hairy Root Induction: Transfer treated plants to vermiculite for rooting. Transformed hairy roots, exhibiting typical morphology, can be observed within several weeks.
• Confocal Microscopy: Analyze transformed roots using laser scanning confocal microscopy (e.g., excitation 488 nm, emission 505–550 nm for GFP) [10].

B. Virus-Mediated Genome Editing [10] This approach utilizes viruses to deliver genome editing components into plants that already express Cas9.

Experimental Protocol:

• Plant Material: Use Cas9-overexpressing transgenic plants (e.g., tobacco).
• Virus Vector Preparation: Engineer virus vectors (e.g., Tobacco Rattle Virus - TRV, or Citrus Leaf Blotch Virus - CLBV) to carry the gRNA module targeting an endogenous gene (e.g., Pds).
• Plant Infection: Infect the Cas9-expressing plants with the engineered virus.
• Phenotype Analysis: Successful editing is confirmed by observing the expected phenotype (e.g., photo-bleaching in case of Pds knockout) [10].

Workflow Diagram: Non-Tissue Culture Validation Methods

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 2: Key Research Reagent Solutions for Non-Model Plant Studies

Reagent / Material	Function / Application	Example Use Case
Agrobacterium rhizogenes (K599)	Mediates genetic transformation of roots to produce "hairy roots" for rapid gene functional analysis.	Functional gene analysis in strawberry and citrus roots [10].
Virus Vectors (TRV, CLBV)	Delivery system for genome editing components (gRNA) into Cas9-expressing plants.	Editing the endogenous Pds gene in tobacco [10].
Developmental Regulators (DRs)	Genes that enhance shoot and root formation, facilitating in planta transformation.	Inducing transgenic shoot formation in plants resistant to traditional transformation [10].
Machine Learning Annotation Tools (Helixer)	Improves gene model accuracy and identifies mis-annotations like chimeric genes in novel genomes.	Validating and correcting gene models in non-model plant genomes [11].
BrCH2CONH-PEG1-N3	BrCH2CONH-PEG1-N3, MF:C6H11BrN4O2, MW:251.08 g/mol	Chemical Reagent
Methylethyllead	Methylethyllead, CAS:106673-67-0, MF:C3H8Pb+2, MW:251 g/mol	Chemical Reagent

Critical Consideration: Addressing Annotation Quality

A foundational challenge in non-model organism research is the prevalence of chimeric gene mis-annotations, where distinct adjacent genes are incorrectly fused. A 2025 study identified 605 such confirmed cases across 30 eukaryotic genomes, with plants and invertebrates being particularly affected [11]. These errors propagate through databases and can severely mislead gene discovery efforts, resulting in incorrect functional assignments and expression profiles. Utilizing modern annotation tools like Helixer, a deep learning-based model, can help identify and correct these errors, thereby increasing the reliability of the genomic data used for discovery pipelines like NEEDLE [11].

For researchers embarking on gene discovery in non-model plants with limited multi-omics data, the choice of strategy depends on the specific research question and available resources.

• For Prioritizing Key Regulators: The NEEDLE computational pipeline is highly effective when transcriptome data from dynamic processes (e.g., development, stress response) is available. Its ability to infer upstream regulators from co-expression networks makes it a powerful, cost-effective first step [7].
• For Functional Gene Validation: Non-tissue culture transformation methods are indispensable for bypassing the major bottleneck of tissue culture. A. rhizogenes-mediated transformation and virus-mediated editing provide rapid, feasible avenues for in planta functional validation in many recalcitrant species [10].
• For Ensuring Data Foundation: Regardless of the chosen path, initial investment in validating and improving genome annotation quality using tools like Helixer is crucial to prevent downstream failures caused by mis-annotated genes [11].

By integrating robust computational inference with direct experimental validation techniques, researchers can systematically overcome the initial barrier of limited multi-omics datasets and accelerate the discovery and functional characterization of genes in non-model plants.

Leveraging Evolutionary Conservation and Divergence in Gene Regulatory Networks

Gene Regulatory Networks (GRNs) represent the complex circuits of interactions between transcription factors (TFs) and their target genes, governing cellular processes, organismal development, and stress responses. For researchers studying non-model plant organisms—species lacking extensive genomic resources or genetic tools—GRN analysis provides a powerful framework for inferring gene function by leveraging evolutionary principles. The central premise is that functional conservation preserves core regulatory modules across species, while evolutionary divergence creates species-specific adaptations. This duality enables scientists to extrapolate knowledge from model organisms while identifying unique biological mechanisms in their species of interest. Understanding both conserved and divergent elements has become particularly valuable for crop improvement, as it allows researchers to identify key regulators of traits that may have been lost in model systems but preserved in non-model crops or wild relatives.

Recent advances in comparative genomics and single-cell technologies have revolutionized our ability to map GRNs across species, even with limited prior genomic information. These approaches rely on the fundamental discovery that while trans-regulatory components (transcription factors themselves) often remain conserved across evolutionary timescales, cis-regulatory elements (promoters, enhancers) diverge more rapidly, creating species-specific gene expression patterns [12] [13]. This evolutionary principle enables researchers to distinguish between core biological processes essential across species and specialized adaptations unique to particular organisms or environments.

Theoretical Foundations: Evolutionary Principles of GRN Architecture

The Conservation-Divergence Spectrum in Gene Regulation

Gene regulatory networks evolve through a dynamic interplay between conservation of core circuits and divergence of peripheral components. Studies comparing salt stress responses in the early-diverging plant Marchantia polymorpha and the late-diverging Arabidopsis thaliana revealed that WRKY-family transcription factors and their feedback loops serve as central nodes in salt-responsive GRNs across evolutionary timescales [12]. Despite this conservation in trans-regulatory components, the cis-regulatory sequences of WRKY-target genes showed significant divergence, associated with network expansion and specialization [12].

This pattern of conserved trans-regulators and quickly evolving cis-regulatory sequences appears to be a fundamental principle across kingdoms. Research in mammalian systems demonstrated that the genomic regulatory syntax—the DNA motifs recognized by sequence-specific DNA binding proteins—remains highly conserved from rodents to primates, despite substantial sequence divergence in regulatory elements [13]. This conservation enables the prediction of regulatory elements in non-model species based on known motifs from model organisms.

Mechanisms of GRN Rewiring and Functional Consequences

GRN evolution occurs through several mechanistic pathways:

• Regulatory Element Turnover: Enhancers and other regulatory elements exhibit rapid turnover during evolution, with transposable elements contributing significantly to species-specific regulatory innovation [13]. In fact, studies of the mammalian neocortex found that transposable elements contribute to nearly 80% of human-specific candidate cis-regulatory elements in cortical cells [13].

• Network Rewiring: Changes in the connections between transcription factors and their target genes can lead to phenotypic divergence. Comparative studies between humans and mice revealed that rewired regulatory relationships contain a higher proportion of species-specific regulatory elements and can alter functional modules composed of many regulatory targets [14].

• Expression Domain Shifts: Conservation of protein-coding sequences with divergence in expression patterns can lead to novel traits. For example, a chromosomal inversion of chromosome 12 in the neem lineage (Azadirachta indica) compared to chinaberry (Melia azedarach) represents a karyotypic change underlying allopatric speciation, potentially affecting gene regulation [15].

Table 1: Evolutionary Mechanisms Driving GRN Conservation and Divergence

Mechanism	Impact on GRN	Evolutionary Timescale	Functional Consequence
Trans-factor Conservation	Preservation of core network architecture	Long-term conservation	Maintenance of essential biological processes
Cis-element Divergence	Alteration of regulatory connections	Rapid evolution	Species-specific expression patterns and adaptations
Network Rewiring	Changes in TF-target gene relationships	Medium to long-term	Phenotypic differences between species
Regulatory Element Turnover	Gain/loss of regulatory elements	Rapid evolution	Regulatory innovation and specialization
Gene Family Expansion	Increase in network components	Variable	Specialized metabolic pathways or physiological adaptations

Computational Approaches for Comparative GRN Analysis

Network Construction and Comparison Methodologies

Computational tools for GRN comparison leverage evolutionary principles to identify both conserved and divergent regulatory elements. The sc-compReg method enables comparative analysis of GRNs between conditions or species using single-cell data through a multi-step process [16]:

• Joint Clustering and Embedding: Cells from both scRNA-seq and scATAC-seq data are jointly clustered and visualized in a unified embedding, allowing identification of homologous cell types across species.

• Linked Subpopulation Identification: Corresponding cell populations across species or conditions are matched based on conserved marker gene expression, ensuring that comparisons are made between biologically equivalent cell types.

• Differential Regulatory Analysis: A novel statistical test identifies differential regulatory relations between linked subpopulations based on changes in the relationship between transcription factor regulatory potential (TFRP) and target gene expression.

The NEEDLE (Network-Enabled Gene Discovery) pipeline addresses the challenge of limited multi-omics resources for non-model species by systematically generating co-expression gene network modules, measuring gene connectivity, and establishing network hierarchy to pinpoint key transcriptional regulators from dynamic transcriptome datasets [7]. This approach has been successfully applied to identify transcription factors regulating cellulose synthase-like F6 (CSLF6) in Brachypodium and sorghum, revealing both evolutionarily conserved and divergent regulatory elements among grass species [7].

For visual comparison of multiple networks, CompNet provides a graphical user interface that allows researchers to identify union, intersection, and exclusive regions across networks, with visualization features like "pie-nodes" that display node affiliation across multiple networks simultaneously [17].

Quantitative Metrics for GRN Comparison

Several specialized metrics enable quantitative comparison of GRNs across species:

• CompNet Neighbor Similarity Index (CNSI): A novel metric for capturing neighborhood architecture of constituent nodes, going beyond simple edge comparison to account for local network topology [17].

• Transcription Factor Regulatory Potential (TFRP): A cell-specific index that integrates TF expression and regulatory potential calculated from accessibility of multiple regulatory elements, providing a more comprehensive view of regulatory relationships than TF expression alone [16].

• Phenotype Similarity (PS) Score: A quantitative measure of phenotypic similarity of orthologous genes between species, allowing correlation of network rewiring with phenotypic outcomes [14].

Table 2: Computational Tools for GRN Construction and Comparison

Tool	Primary Function	Data Input Requirements	Key Features	Applicability to Non-Model Species
NEEDLE	Network-based gene discovery	Dynamic transcriptome data	Identifies upstream transcriptional regulators without full genome sequence	High - designed specifically for non-model species
sc-compReg	Comparative regulatory analysis	scRNA-seq + scATAC-seq from two conditions	Tests differential regulatory relations; controls false discovery rate	Medium - requires single-cell data which may be limited
CompNet	Visual network comparison	Edge-lists, node-lists, or path-lists	GUI-based; "pie-node" visualization; union/intersection analysis	High - works with various network input formats
Regulatory Network Repository (RegNetwork)	TF-target gene relationships	Experimental or predicted regulatory connections	Integrated data of regulatory connections; cross-species comparisons	Medium - depends on available regulatory data for species of interest

Figure 1: Computational workflow for comparative GRN analysis in non-model plant species, integrating multiple data types and analytical steps to identify evolutionarily conserved and divergent regulatory elements.

Experimental Protocols for GRN Validation in Non-Model Plants

Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) for Functional Validation

For non-model plants with large genomes, low transformation efficiency, and long regeneration times, Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) provides an efficient alternative to stable transformation for validating GRN components [6]. The protocol using Cymbidium mosaic virus (CymMV)-based vectors for orchids exemplifies this approach:

Vector Construction:

• Isolate a mild, symptomless CymMV strain from Phalaenopsis species to minimize physiological changes that could complicate interpretations.
• Engineer the pCymMV-pro60 vector with duplicated subgenomic promoter of coat protein (CP) to enhance foreign RNA transcription [6].
• Clone target gene fragments (150-500 nt) into the vector, with shorter fragments providing greater gene specificity and longer fragments potentially targeting multiple gene family members.

Plant Inoculation and Validation:

• In vitro transcribe recombinant vectors and mechanically inoculate leaves of target plants.
• Monitor systemic infection 14-28 days post-inoculation using northern blot analysis to confirm viral spread.
• Quantify target gene knockdown using real-time RT-PCR, typically achieving 73-97.8% reduction in transcript levels depending on fragment length and specificity [6].
• Document morphological phenotypes, with floral identity gene silencing in orchids producing visible changes in flower morphology within 2 months compared to 2-3 years for conventional approaches.

This methodology dramatically accelerates functional validation in slow-growing species, enabling researchers to test predictions from comparative GRN analyses without establishing stable transformation protocols.

Integrative Multi-Omics Validation Framework

For comprehensive validation of conserved and divergent GRN components, an integrated multi-omics approach provides the most robust evidence:

• Cross-Species Epigenomic Profiling: Generate comparative chromatin accessibility maps (ATAC-seq), DNA methylomes, and chromatin conformation data for homologous tissues across multiple species [13].

• Expression Quantitative Trait Loci (eQTL) Mapping: Identify genetic variants associated with expression changes, particularly focusing on trans-eQTLs that indicate changes in regulatory relationships [14].

• Machine Learning-Based Prediction: Train sequence-based predictors of candidate cis-regulatory elements in different species, leveraging the conserved genomic regulatory syntax to identify functional elements [13].

• Phenotypic Correlation: Associate network features with phenotypic differences using semantic phenotyping approaches like PhenoDigm, which enables quantitative comparison of phenotypic similarity across species [14].

Case Studies: Evolutionary Insights from Comparative GRN Analysis

Salt Stress Response Across Plant Evolution

A landmark study comparing salt-responsive GRNs in Marchantia polymorpha (early-diverging plant) and Arabidopsis thaliana (late-diverging plant) revealed both deeply conserved and rapidly evolving elements [12]. The research demonstrated:

• Conserved Components: WRKY transcription factors maintained central positions in both networks, with conserved feedback loops despite ~450 million years of divergence.

• Divergent Elements: Cis-regulatory sequences showed significant divergence, with network size expansion in Arabidopsis linking salt stress to more specialized developmental and physiological responses.

• Evolutionary Pattern: The conserved trans-regulators with quickly evolving cis-regulatory sequences represent a strategic balance maintaining core functions while allowing environmental adaptation.

This comparative approach explained how stress response networks can maintain essential functions while acquiring species-specific adaptations, providing a template for engineering stress resilience in crops by manipulating recently evolved network components.

Limonoid Biosynthesis in Meliaceae Species

Comparative genomics of neem (Azadirachta indica) and chinaberry (Melia azedarach) revealed how regulatory evolution contributes to biochemical diversity [15]. The study identified:

• Speciation Mechanism: A lineage-specific inversion of chromosome 12 in the neem lineage contributed to allopatric speciation, potentially affecting gene regulation.

• Enzyme Diversification: Two BAHD-acetyltransferases in chinaberry (MaAT8824 and MaAT1704) catalyze acetylation at both C-12 and C-3 hydroxyl groups of limonoids, while the syntenic neem copy (AiAT0635) lacks this activity.

• Functional Restoration: A critical N-terminal region (SAGAVP) was identified that could restore acetylation activity when swapped into the chinaberry enzyme, demonstrating how minimal changes can create functional diversity.

This case illustrates how comparative analysis of specialized metabolism GRNs can identify key genetic changes underlying chemical diversity, with applications for metabolic engineering of valuable plant compounds.

Table 3: Experimental Approaches for GRN Validation in Non-Model Plants

Method	Key Applications	Timeframe	Technical Barriers	Information Gained
Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS)	Gene function validation; Network perturbation	1-3 months	Virus host range; Fragment optimization	Necessary function of network components
Heterologous Expression	Testing regulatory function; Enzyme activity	2-6 months	Proper protein folding; Cofactor requirements	Sufficient function of regulators
Comparative Epigenomics	cis-regulatory element identification; Conservation assessment	3-6 months	Tissue homogeneity; Reference genome quality	Evolutionary conservation of regulatory elements
Network Perturbation Analysis	Testing network robustness; Identifying key nodes	6-12 months	Multiple simultaneous perturbations; Phenotypic readouts	Network topology and resilience

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Essential reagents and computational resources for comparative GRN analysis in non-model plants include both experimental and bioinformatic tools:

Table 4: Essential Research Reagents and Resources for Comparative GRN Analysis

Resource Category	Specific Examples	Function/Application	Considerations for Non-Model Species
VIGS Vectors	CymMV-based vectors [6]; TRV-based systems	Rapid gene silencing without stable transformation	Host range limitations; Efficiency optimization
Epigenomic Profiling Kits	ATAC-seq kits; ChIP-seq reagents	Mapping open chromatin; TF binding sites	Cross-species antibody compatibility; Protocol adaptation
Single-Cell Platforms	10x Multiome; snm3C-seq [13]	Parallel transcriptome and epigenome profiling	Tissue dissociation protocols; Nuclei isolation
Comparative Genomics Databases	RegNetwork [14]; PLAZA; Phytozome	Orthology inference; Regulatory data	Taxonomic coverage; Annotation quality
Network Analysis Tools	NEEDLE [7]; sc-compReg [16]; CompNet [17]	Network construction; Comparative analysis	Input data requirements; Computational expertise
6,6-Diphenylhex-5-enal	6,6-Diphenylhex-5-enal|C18H18O|250.34 g/mol	6,6-Diphenylhex-5-enal . High-purity reference standard for research. For Research Use Only. Not for human or veterinary use.	Bench Chemicals
5-nitroso-1H-imidazole	5-Nitroso-1H-imidazole|High-Purity Reference Standard	5-Nitroso-1H-imidazole for research. A critical nitrosamine impurity standard for pharmaceutical QC and analytical method development. For Research Use Only. Not for human use.	Bench Chemicals

Implementation Framework for Non-Model Species Research

Strategic Approach for Limited-Genomic-Resource Species

For researchers working with species having limited genomic resources, a phased implementation strategy maximizes success:

• Transcriptome-First Approach: Begin with comparative transcriptomics across multiple species and conditions to identify conserved co-expression modules, using tools like NEEDLE [7]. This requires minimal genomic resources while providing substantial functional insights.

• Leverage Evolutionary Conservation: Use conserved regulatory syntax and motif information from model species to predict regulatory elements in non-model species, as demonstrated by the successful prediction of cis-regulatory elements across mammals [13].

• Targeted Epigenomic Profiling: Focus epigenomic analyses on genomic regions identified through comparative approaches, minimizing resource requirements while maximizing biological insights.

• Functional Validation Prioritization: Prioritize candidate genes for experimental validation based on both conservation (indicating essential function) and divergence (indicating species-specific adaptations), using efficient methods like VIGS [6].

Figure 2: Implementation framework for comparative GRN analysis in non-model plant species, showing a phased approach from data collection through functional validation to practical application.

Interpretation Guidelines for Evolutionary Conservation Patterns

Correct interpretation of conservation and divergence patterns is essential for accurate functional inferences:

• Deep Conservation: Network components conserved across large evolutionary distances (e.g., WRKY regulators in plant stress responses [12]) typically represent core biological processes essential for viability.

• Clade-Specific Conservation: Elements conserved within a clade (e.g., primates [13]) but not outside often represent specialized biological functions important for that lineage.

• Recent Divergence: Species-specific network components frequently underlie distinctive phenotypic traits, such as the specialized metabolism differences between neem and chinaberry [15].

• Conserved Syntax with Divergent Elements: The preservation of DNA binding motifs with turnover of specific regulatory elements enables both network stability and flexibility [13].

The strategic analysis of evolutionary conservation and divergence in Gene Regulatory Networks provides a powerful framework for functional gene validation in non-model plant species. By leveraging the fundamental principle that core network architecture is preserved while peripheral components diverge, researchers can prioritize candidate genes for functional studies, design appropriate validation experiments, and interpret results in an evolutionary context. The integration of computational approaches like NEEDLE [7] and sc-compReg [16] with efficient experimental methods like VIGS [6] creates a feasible pathway for comprehensive gene function analysis even in species with limited genomic resources. As comparative genomics and single-cell technologies continue to advance, our ability to decipher the evolutionary language of gene regulation will increasingly enable precise manipulation of desirable traits in non-model crops, wild relatives, and specialized medicinal plants, expanding the toolbox for plant improvement and natural product discovery.

Functional genomics studies of non-model organisms, particularly plants, are crucial for understanding genetic diversity and harnessing valuable agronomic traits. However, such research faces significant challenges, including large genome sizes, lack of decoded genome information, and difficulties in gene function validation. De novo annotation tools have emerged as essential resources for assigning potential biological functions to novel transcripts assembled from high-throughput sequencing data, thereby enabling downstream functional studies. This guide provides a comprehensive comparison of current bioinformatics tools for de novo annotation, with a specific focus on applications in non-model plant organism research, experimental validation methodologies, and practical implementation workflows.

Comparative Analysis of De Novo Annotation Tools

The landscape of de novo annotation tools encompasses both general-purpose platforms and specialized solutions tailored to specific biological questions. The table below summarizes the key features and applications of major tools used in plant genomics research.

Table 1: Comparison of De Novo Annotation Tools for Plant Genomics

Tool Name	Primary Application	Key Features	Input Data	Strengths	Citation
FunctionAnnotator	General transcriptome annotation	GO term assignment, enzyme annotation, domain identification, subcellular localization prediction	Assembled transcriptomes	Comprehensive annotations, parallel computing, taxonomic distribution	[18]
Oatk	Plant organelle genome assembly	Syncmer-based assembler, profile-HMM database, graph resolution algorithm	Whole-genome sequencing data	Efficient handling of complex repeats, improved over existing methods	[19]
NLR-Annotator	NLR immune receptor annotation	Identifies NB-ARC domains, searches for additional NLR-associated motifs	Genomic sequences	High sensitivity and specificity for NLR genes across plant taxa	[20]
EDTA (Extensive de-novo TE Annotator)	Transposable element annotation	Integrates multiple TE detection programs, filters false discoveries	Genome assemblies	Generates high-quality non-redundant TE libraries, benchmarks performance	[21]
NEEDLE	Network-based gene discovery	Generates co-expression modules, measures connectivity, establishes hierarchy	Dynamic transcriptome datasets	Identifies upstream transcription factors without multi-omics data	[7]

Performance Metrics and Experimental Data

FunctionAnnotator demonstrates robust performance in annotating transcriptomes from non-model organisms. In a benchmark study using clam (Meretrix meretrix) transcriptome data totaling 38 Mb, FunctionAnnotator completed comprehensive annotations within 7.5 hours, identifying molecular functions for 35,971 out of 56,263 contigs. The tool successfully identified that the most abundant molecular functions were ion binding, hydrolase activity, nucleotide binding, protein binding, transferase activity, and nucleic acid binding, consistent with previous studies in marine organisms [18].

Oatk shows significant improvements in assembly quality and efficiency for plant organelle genomes. When applied to 195 land plant species, Oatk achieved more than 99.8% representation of BUSCO genes on average, with 86% represented by three complete copies, outperforming previous gene projection methods [19].

NLR-Annotator was successfully validated on the Arabidopsis genome, demonstrating both high sensitivity (ratio of identified NLR genes to all NLR genes) and specificity (ratio of correctly identified NLRs to all identified NLRs). The tool has been applied to eight economically important crops, including soybean, maize, and Brachypodium, showing broad applicability across diverse plant taxa [20].

Experimental Protocols for Annotation Validation

De Novo Annotation Workflow for Non-Model Plants

Graphviz Diagram: De Novo Annotation Workflow

Diagram Title: Comprehensive De Novo Annotation Workflow

Protocol 1: Comprehensive Transcriptome Annotation Using FunctionAnnotator

• Input Preparation: Prepare assembled transcript contigs in FASTA format. FunctionAnnotator requires transcripts with predicted amino acid sequences longer than 66 amino acids for optimal annotation [18].

• Annotation Execution:

  • Upload transcript sequences to the FunctionAnnotator web server or run locally
  • The tool performs BLAST searches against NCBI NR database
  • Parallel computing enables efficient processing of large datasets
  • Taxonomic distribution analysis identifies species of best hits

• Output Analysis:

  • GO term assignments at user-selectable levels
  • Enzyme commission (EC) number annotations
  • Protein domain and motif identifications
  • Predictions for subcellular localization, transmembrane domains, and secretory signals

• Validation Integration: Use annotation results to select candidate genes for experimental validation, prioritizing those with domains of interest but without NR database hits, as these may represent novel genes [18].

Protocol 2: NLR Gene Identification in Crop Genomes

• Genome Processing: Fragment genome into 20-kb segments with short overlaps [20]

• Motif Screening:

  • Translate fragments in all six reading frames
  • Screen for NB-ARC associated motifs
  • Merge targeted fragments

• Domain Extension: Use NB-ARC motifs as seeds to search upstream and downstream sequences for additional NLR-associated domains (coiled-coil, LRR)

• Repertoire Assembly: Combine all reported NLR loci to generate complete NLR repertoire for the genome

This method has been successfully applied to the bread wheat genome, identifying 3,400 NLR loci and 1,560 complete NLRs, with findings of telomeric distribution and clustering providing evolutionary insights [20].

Protocol 3: Pan-Genome Annotation for Comparative Analysis

Recent advances in de novo annotation enable construction of pan-genomes for comparative analysis. A study on hexaploid wheat generated de novo gene annotations for nine cultivars, identifying 140,178 to 145,065 high-confidence gene models per cultivar. The protocol includes:

• Evidence Integration: Combine Iso-Seq data (390-700K reads per sample) with RNA-seq data (56-85M read pairs per sample) across multiple tissues [22]

• Gene Prediction: Utilize automated annotation pipelines incorporating transcriptomic evidence, protein homology, and ab initio prediction

• Consolidation: Implement gene consolidation procedures to correct for missed gene models and ensure comparability between genomes

• Orthogroup Analysis: Identify groups of orthologous genes to define core (62.52%), shell (36.61%), and cloud (0.86%) genomes across cultivars [22]

Functional Classification Systems and Database Comparisons

The effectiveness of annotation tools depends significantly on the underlying functional classification systems they utilize. Major systems include:

Table 2: Comparison of Functional Classification Systems

System	Type	Coverage	Strengths	Applications	Citation
eggNOG	Orthologous groups	7.5M sequences, 30,955 leaves	Low redundancy, clean structure	General-purpose annotation	[23]
KEGG	Pathways	13.2M sequences, 55,124 leaves	Manually curated, metabolic pathways	Pathway analysis, metabolism	[23]
InterPro:BP	Protein families	14.8M sequences, 9,581 leaves	Comprehensive family coverage	Protein domain analysis	[23]
SEED	Subsystems	47.7M sequences, 823 leaves	Clean hierarchy, process-oriented	Microbial annotation, MG-RAST	[23]

Studies comparing these systems have found that eggNOG performs best regarding sequence redundancy and structure, while KEGG and InterPro:BP may be more informative for specific applications such as medical research [23].

Functional Validation Strategies for Non-Model Plants

Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) Protocol

For non-model plants with long life cycles, such as orchids (2-3 years to flowering), VIGS provides an efficient alternative to stable transformation for functional validation [6].

• Vector Development:

  • Select symptomless virus isolates (e.g., Cymbidium mosaic virus for orchids)
  • Construct cDNA infectious clones with duplicated subgenomic promoters
  • Insert target gene fragments (150-500 nucleotides) into viral vectors

• Plant Inoculation:

  • In vitro transcription to generate viral RNA
  • Mechanical inoculation of transcripts onto plants
  • Systemic infection established within 3-4 weeks

• Efficiency Assessment:

  • Quantify target gene knockdown using real-time RT-PCR
  • Successful implementations achieved 73-97.8% reduction in transcription levels
  • Observe morphological changes in silenced plants

This approach has been successfully used to validate functions of MADS-box genes involved in floral development in Phalaenopsis orchids, significantly accelerating functional studies in these long-lifecycle plants [6].

Network-Based Discovery Using NEEDLE

The NEEDLE pipeline enables identification of transcription factors regulating genes of interest in non-model species:

• Network Construction: Generate co-expression gene network modules from dynamic transcriptome datasets [7]

• Connectivity Analysis: Measure gene connectivity and establish network hierarchy to pinpoint key transcriptional regulators

• Validation Application: This approach has been successfully applied to identify transcription factors regulating cellulose synthase-like F6 (CSLF6) in Brachypodium and sorghum, revealing evolutionarily conserved and divergent regulatory elements [7]

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents for De Novo Annotation and Validation

Reagent/Material	Function	Application Examples	Specification Guidelines
RNA-Seq Libraries	Transcriptome profiling	De novo assembly, expression analysis	150 bp paired-end, 56-85M read pairs per sample [22]
Iso-Seq Data	Full-length transcript validation	Gene model correction, isoform discovery	390-700K reads per sample [22]
CymMV VIGS Vectors	Gene silencing in orchids	Functional validation of floral genes	Symptomless isolate, duplicated subgenomic promoters [6]
Curated TE Library	Training data for annotation	Improving TE annotation quality	Species-specific, manually curated sequences [21]
HMM Profile Databases	Organelle gene identification	Plastid and mitochondrial genome assembly	130 plastid and 81 mitochondrial gene profiles [19]
BUSCO datasets	Annotation quality assessment	Benchmarking completeness	poales_odb10 (4,896 genes) for Poales [22]
3-Bromopenta-1,4-diene	3-Bromopenta-1,4-diene, CAS:109774-95-0, MF:C5H7Br, MW:147.01 g/mol	Chemical Reagent	Bench Chemicals
Plumbanone--cerium (1/1)	Plumbanone--cerium (1/1)|Research Chemicals	Plumbanone--cerium (1/1) is a chemical reagent for research use only (RUO). It is not for human or veterinary use. Explore its applications and value for scientific investigation.	Bench Chemicals

De novo annotation tools have dramatically advanced functional genomics research in non-model plant organisms. FunctionAnnotator provides comprehensive transcriptome annotation capabilities, while specialized tools like NLR-Annotator and EDTA address specific biological questions. The integration of these computational tools with experimental validation methods such as VIGS enables researchers to overcome challenges associated with non-model organisms, including large genomes, long life cycles, and limited genomic resources. As demonstrated in pan-genome studies of hexaploid wheat, these approaches are revealing unprecedented insights into genetic diversity, gene family evolution, and regulatory networks, ultimately accelerating crop improvement through targeted engineering and breeding approaches.

Cutting-Edge Pipelines and Practical Workflows for Functional Validation

The functional validation of genes in non-model plant species presents a significant challenge for researchers, primarily due to the lack of comprehensive multi-omics resources that are readily available for model organisms. Identifying key transcriptional regulators of important agronomic traits represents a crucial step in developing more productive and stress-resistant crops. In this context, gene regulatory network (GRN) analysis has emerged as a powerful computational approach for deciphering the complex interactions between DNA, RNA, and proteins within plant cells. Traditionally, accurately predicting transcription factors (TFs) has been difficult due to these complex interactions and insufficient datasets for most crop species.

To address this methodological gap, researchers have developed NEEDLE (Network-Enabled Pipeline for Gene Discovery and Validation), a user-friendly tool that systematically generates co-expression gene network modules from dynamic transcriptome datasets. This pipeline measures gene connectivity and establishes network hierarchy to pinpoint key transcriptional regulators, providing plant scientists without extensive bioinformatics expertise a valuable resource for gene discovery. The applicability of NEEDLE extends to foundational research areas including photosynthetic efficiency, stress responses, and metabolic pathways in photosynthetic organisms, offering particular promise for understanding how regulatory networks evolve across species.

The NEEDLE Pipeline: Architecture and Implementation

Core Computational Methodology

The NEEDLE pipeline employs a systematic approach to transform raw transcriptomic data into biologically meaningful predictions of transcriptional regulators. Its architecture integrates co-expression network analysis with GRN prediction specifically optimized for non-model plant species. The process begins by constructing co-expression modules from dynamic transcriptome data, which involves calculating correlation coefficients between gene expression patterns across different conditions, treatments, or time points. These correlated genes are then grouped into modules that potentially represent functionally related biological processes.

Following module construction, NEEDLE employs sophisticated algorithms to measure gene connectivity within and between modules, calculating metrics such as degree centrality and betweenness centrality to identify highly connected "hub" genes. The pipeline then applies hierarchical analysis to position these hub genes within the broader network architecture, enabling the systematic identification of transcription factors that sit atop regulatory hierarchies. This integrated approach allows researchers to move from gene expression data to candidate regulator identification without requiring extensive multi-omics datasets, making it particularly valuable for species with limited genomic resources.

Experimental Validation Framework

A critical component of the NEEDLE pipeline is its integration with experimental validation methodologies. After computational identification of potential transcription factor regulators, the pipeline supports downstream validation through in planta techniques. In the referenced research, NEEDLE was applied to identify transcription factors regulating cellulose synthase-like F6 (CSLF6), a crucial cell wall biosynthetic gene, in both Brachypodium and sorghum. The validation experiments not only confirmed regulators of CSLF6 but also provided insights into the evolutionary conservation or divergence of gene regulatory elements among grass species.

Other validation approaches compatible with NEEDLE predictions include Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated root genetic transformation, which enables rapid functional testing in hairy root systems, and virus-mediated genome editing, which can be used to modulate candidate gene expression. When coupled with CRISPR-based validation strategies, NEEDLE significantly accelerates the functional characterization and translational application of key regulatory genes in crop improvement programs. This integrated computational-experimental framework provides a robust pipeline for confirming the biological relevance of predicted transcription factors.

Comparative Performance Analysis

Benchmarking Against Established Methods

To objectively evaluate NEEDLE's performance, developers validated its accuracy using two independent datasets before applying it to identify CSLF6 regulators. The pipeline demonstrates particular strength in its minimal computational requirements compared to other bioinformatics tools that require extensive computing resources, making it accessible to researchers without specialized computational infrastructure. Additionally, its user-friendly workflow lowers the barrier to entry for plant scientists with limited bioinformatics expertise, while maintaining robust analytical capabilities.

Table 1: Comparative Analysis of Gene Discovery Approaches for Non-Model Plants

Method	Multi-omics Requirements	Computational Demand	Experimental Validation Efficiency	Accessibility for Non-Bioinformaticians
NEEDLE Pipeline	Low (uses only transcriptome data)	Minimal	High (streamlined for in planta validation)	High (user-friendly workflow)
Traditional Genetics	None	Low	Low (time-intensive)	High (established methods)
Multi-omics Integration	High (requires genomic, epigenomic, transcriptomic data)	Very High	Variable	Low (requires specialized expertise)
Comparative Genomics	Medium (requires cross-species genomic data)	Medium	Medium to Low	Medium

Application-Dependent Performance Metrics

When assessed for its capability to provide biologically relevant TF predictions, NEEDLE demonstrates exceptional performance in evolutionary analysis, successfully uncovering both conserved and divergent regulatory mechanisms between Brachypodium and sorghum. This capability provides valuable insights into how regulatory networks evolve across related grass species, information that can inform translational approaches applying findings from model to crop species.

In practical applications, the pipeline has shown high predictive accuracy for identifying transcription factors regulating specific target genes associated with important traits. In the CSLF6 case study, NEEDLE successfully identified novel regulators while also mapping the network topology surrounding this key biosynthetic gene. The method's design efficiency is particularly notable, as it eliminates the need for extensive multi-omics datasets that are frequently unavailable for non-model species, while still generating high-confidence predictions suitable for guiding experimental validation.

Table 2: Experimental Data Supporting NEEDLE's Performance in TF Identification

Performance Metric	NEEDLE Implementation	Conventional Methods (Average)	Experimental Support
TF Prediction Accuracy	Biologically relevant predictions validated in planta	Variable validation success	Confirmed regulators of CSLF6 in Brachypodium and sorghum [24] [25]
Data Requirements	Dynamic transcriptome data only	Multiple data types (genomic, epigenomic, etc.)	Successful with RNA-seq data alone [24]
Evolutionary Insight Generation	High (conservation/divergence analysis)	Limited	Revealed evolutionary patterns in grass species regulatory elements [24]
Technical Accessibility	User-friendly with minimal computational demands	Often requires specialized bioinformatics skills	Accessible to researchers without computational expertise [25]

Alternative Gene Discovery and Validation Methodologies

Tissue Culture-Independent Transformation Methods

For validating gene function predictions generated by NEEDLE, several tissue culture-independent methods have emerged as valuable experimental approaches. Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated root genetic transformation enables researchers to study gene function in hairy root systems without the need for complex tissue culture protocols. This method is particularly valuable for species recalcitrant to regeneration from callus tissue, and has been successfully applied in species including citrus and strawberry for subcellular localization studies and preliminary functional analysis.

Another innovative approach utilizes developmental regulators (DRs) to induce transgenic shoot and root formation in planta. Research has demonstrated that these critical developmental regulators are highly conserved across different plant species, enhancing their utility for validating gene function predictions in non-model organisms. These methods offer significant advantages in reducing costs, experimental timelines, and technical barriers associated with traditional tissue culture-dependent transformation, making them particularly suitable for rapid validation of computational predictions.

Virus-Induced Gene Editing Systems

Virus-mediated genome editing represents another powerful approach for validating transcription factor function identified through computational prediction. This methodology involves infecting plants that overexpress Cas9 with viruses carrying sgRNA modules targeting candidate genes. Research has successfully employed Tobacco Rattle Virus (TRV) and Citrus Leaf Blotch Virus (CLBV) to edit endogenous genes in Cas9-overexpressing transgenic tobacco, demonstrating the efficacy of this validation approach.

These virus-based systems provide particular value for high-throughput validation of multiple candidate genes identified through NEEDLE analysis, as they can be deployed without the need for stable transformation. The methodology benefits from being both cost-effective and time-efficient, enabling researchers to quickly assess the functional relevance of predicted transcription factors before committing to more resource-intensive stable transformation experiments. When integrated with NEEDLE predictions, these validation techniques create a powerful pipeline for accelerating gene function characterization in non-model plants.

Essential Research Reagents and Tools

Effective implementation of the NEEDLE pipeline requires appropriate computational tools for network visualization and analysis. Several open-source software options are available to researchers, each with particular strengths for gene regulatory network analysis. Cytoscape provides a powerful platform for visualizing complex networks and integrating these with attribute data, enabling researchers to overlay expression data or functional annotations onto network representations. Gephi offers complementary capabilities as leading visualization and exploration software for all kinds of graphs and networks, with particular strength in manipulating graphs in real-time and detecting clusters.

For researchers preferring programmatic approaches, NetworkX (a Python package) enables the creation, manipulation, and study of complex network structure, dynamics, and functions. The igraph library provides similar capabilities across multiple programming environments including R, Python, and Mathematica, offering extensive network analysis tools. These computational resources empower researchers to not only run the NEEDLE pipeline but also to explore and interpret the resulting networks through interactive visualization and custom analysis.

Table 3: Essential Research Reagent Solutions for NEEDLE Implementation and Validation

Reagent/Tool	Category	Function in NEEDLE Pipeline	Example Applications
RNA-seq Libraries	Biological Sample	Provides dynamic transcriptome data for co-expression network construction	Time-course experiments under stress conditions [24]
Cytoscape	Computational Tool	Visualizes and analyzes gene co-expression networks and regulatory hierarchies	Integration of network topology with gene expression data [26]
Agrobacterium rhizogenes K599	Biological Reagent	Enables rapid validation of candidate genes in hairy root systems	Functional testing in citrus and strawberry [10]
CRISPR/Cas9 System	Molecular Tool	Validates predicted transcription factors through genome editing	Targeted mutagenesis of candidate regulatory genes [10]
Virus Vector Systems (TRV, CLBV)	Delivery Tool	Enables virus-mediated genome editing for high-throughput validation	Editing endogenous Pds gene in Cas9-overexpressing tobacco [10]

Experimental Validation Reagents

For the experimental validation phase following computational prediction, several key reagents facilitate functional characterization of candidate transcription factors. Agrobacterium strains including K599 for hairy root transformation and GV3101 for standard plant transformation serve as essential delivery systems for introducing genetic constructs into plant tissues. These microbial tools enable researchers to manipulate gene expression in candidate transcription factors to assess their functional role in regulating target genes.

Molecular constructs for gene expression modulation represent another critical reagent category, including vectors for overexpression, RNA interference, and CRISPR-based genome editing. The integration of fluorescent reporters such as GFP enables researchers to visualize subcellular localization and track gene expression patterns in transformed tissues, providing important spatial context for transcription factor function. For species resistant to traditional transformation, virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) vectors offer an alternative approach for rapid functional assessment of NEEDLE-predicted transcription factors.

Integrated Workflow for Transcription Factor Discovery

The following diagram illustrates the integrated computational-experimental workflow for transcription factor discovery and validation using the NEEDLE pipeline:

Diagram 1: NEEDLE Pipeline Workflow for TF Discovery and Validation

The NEEDLE pipeline represents a significant advancement in network-based discovery for transcription factor identification in non-model plant species. Its integrated computational-experimental framework effectively addresses the challenge of limited multi-omics resources while providing biologically relevant predictions validated through robust experimental approaches. When compared to conventional methods, NEEDLE demonstrates superior efficiency in its minimal data requirements, computational accessibility, and capacity for evolutionary insight generation.

The pipeline's compatibility with emerging tissue culture-independent validation methods positions it as a valuable tool for accelerating crop improvement programs. By enabling researchers to systematically identify key transcriptional regulators of important traits, NEEDLE facilitates the development of more productive and stress-resistant crops—a critical objective in addressing global food security challenges. Its application to CSLF6 regulation in grasses exemplifies how this approach can uncover both conserved and divergent regulatory elements, providing fundamental insights into the evolution of gene regulatory networks while delivering practical targets for crop enhancement.

In the field of functional genomics, a significant challenge persists in the study of non-model organisms, which include the majority of medicinal plants and specialized crop species. These organisms often possess large, complex genomes that are not fully sequenced or annotated, making conventional transcriptomic approaches difficult to apply [27]. For researchers investigating plant gene function, this genomic limitation represents a major bottleneck in linking genetic information to phenotypic traits, such as stress resistance in crops or the production of valuable secondary metabolites in medicinal plants [27]. Tag-based transcriptomic methods have emerged as powerful solutions to these challenges, with EDGE (EcoP15I-tagged Digital Gene Expression) representing a particularly effective methodology for quantifying gene expression without requiring a complete reference genome [28].

The fundamental principle underlying EDGE and similar digital gene expression techniques is the sequencing of short, unique cDNA tags that serve as molecular fingerprints for individual transcripts. By focusing on these defined regions rather than attempting full-length cDNA sequencing, EDGE achieves comprehensive transcriptome coverage with significantly reduced sequencing complexity and computational demands [28]. This approach is especially valuable for plant researchers working with species that have long life cycles, such as orchids, which may take years to reach reproductive maturity and thus present significant challenges for traditional genetic studies [6]. For these difficult-to-study species, EDGE provides a practical pathway to obtain quantitative gene expression data that can accelerate the validation of gene function and support crop improvement efforts.

EDGE Technology: Core Methodology and Workflow

Fundamental Principles of EDGE

The EDGE methodology employs ultra-high-throughput sequencing of defined 27-base pair cDNA fragments that uniquely tag corresponding genes, enabling direct quantification of transcript abundance [28]. Unlike RNA-seq, which sequences randomly fragmented transcripts of varying lengths, EDGE generates standardized, discrete sequence tags that can be precisely mapped and counted. This tag-based approach provides several distinct advantages for studying non-model plants: it eliminates transcript length bias (a known issue in RNA-seq where longer transcripts appear more abundant), exhibits minimal technical noise, and reveals an exceptionally large dynamic range of gene expression (up to 10^6) [28]. Perhaps most importantly for plant researchers, EDGE achieves transcriptome saturation after just 6-8 million reads, making it a cost-effective option for species with limited genomic resources [28].

The technology is particularly suited for detecting expression differences in poorly expressed genes, which often include transcription factors and regulatory molecules that control important agricultural traits [28]. This sensitivity to low-abundance transcripts is critical for plant gene validation studies, where key regulators may be expressed at minimal levels but exert substantial effects on phenotype. Additionally, because EDGE targets specific tag regions rather than full transcripts, it can effectively profile gene expression even when only partial gene sequences are available, as is common for non-model plant species [29].

Experimental Protocol for EDGE Analysis

The EDGE experimental workflow consists of several carefully optimized steps that ensure high-quality gene expression data:

• RNA Isolation and Quality Control: Total RNA is extracted from plant tissues using standard methods, with quality verification through microfluidic analysis. For plant tissues high in secondary metabolites, additional purification steps may be required [28].

• cDNA Synthesis and Tag Generation: mRNA is reverse-transcribed into cDNA using oligo(dT) primers. The cDNA is then digested with EcoP15I restriction enzyme, which generates specific 27-bp tags from defined positions within each transcript [28]. This enzyme-specific tagging creates consistent, comparable markers for each gene.

• Adapter Ligation and Amplification: Specialized adapters containing sequencing motifs are ligated to the tags, followed by limited PCR amplification to create the final sequencing library. The adapter design includes barcode sequences when multiplexing multiple samples [30].

• High-Throughput Sequencing: The tag library is sequenced using next-generation platforms such as Illumina, generating millions of short reads corresponding to the transcript tags [28].

• Bioinformatic Analysis: Sequence tags are processed to remove low-quality reads, then mapped to available genomic or transcriptomic resources. For non-model plants with limited sequence data, de novo tag clustering can be performed, followed by annotation based on homology to related species [27].

The following diagram illustrates the complete EDGE workflow from sample preparation to data analysis:

Comparative Performance Analysis: EDGE vs. Alternative Transcriptomic Methods

Methodological Comparison with RNA-seq and Spatial Transcriptomics

When evaluating transcriptomic technologies for plant gene validation, researchers must consider multiple methodological factors that impact data quality and experimental feasibility. The table below provides a systematic comparison of EDGE against other prominent transcriptomic approaches:

Table 1: Technical Comparison of Transcriptomic Methods for Non-Model Plant Research

Method	Optimal Use Case	Sensitivity for Low-Abundance Transcripts	Reference Genome Dependency	Typical Reads Required	Technical Noise	Transcript Length Bias
EDGE	Non-model organisms, gene discovery	High [28]	Low [28]	6-8 million [28]	Very low [28]	None [28]
RNA-seq	Model organisms, isoform detection	Moderate [28]	High [27]	20-30 million [27]	Moderate	Present [28]
Spatial Transcriptomics	Tissue localization studies	Platform-dependent (varies) [31]	Moderate to high [31]	Varies by platform	Varies by platform	Varies by platform
DeepSAGE	Expression profiling, sample multiplexing	High [30]	Moderate	8-12 million [30]	Low	Minimal

As evidenced in the table, EDGE offers distinct advantages for non-model plant research where reference genomes are often incomplete or unavailable. Its minimal technical noise and absence of transcript length bias make it particularly suitable for comparative expression studies across different treatments, developmental stages, or genetic backgrounds [28]. In contrast, spatial transcriptomics platforms like Stereo-seq, Visium HD, CosMx, and Xenium excel in situ localization of gene expression but typically require more comprehensive genomic resources and specialized instrumentation [31].

Quantitative Performance Metrics Across Platforms

Direct comparative studies provide valuable insights into the practical performance characteristics of different transcriptomic methods. The following table summarizes key quantitative metrics for EDGE and alternative approaches:

Table 2: Performance Metrics of Transcriptomic Platforms Based on Experimental Data

Platform	Dynamic Range	Gene Detection Efficiency	Accuracy in Non-Model Systems	Cost per Sample	Experimental Simplicity
EDGE	10^6 [28]	>99% of genes [28]	High [28]	Low	Simple protocol [28]
RNA-seq	10^5-10^6	>90% (model organisms)	Moderate (requires reference) [27]	Moderate	Complex bioinformatics
5'-DGE	10^4 [32]	~85%	Moderate	Low	Moderate
DeepSAGE	10^5 [30]	>95%	High [30]	Low	Simple protocol [30]

A critical advantage of EDGE demonstrated in these comparisons is its exceptional dynamic range, which enables simultaneous quantification of both highly abundant and rare transcripts without adjustment of sequencing depth [28]. This characteristic is particularly valuable in plant gene validation studies, where key regulatory genes often express at low levels but substantially impact phenotype. For instance, when applied to cheetah skin samples (as a mammalian example), EDGE successfully identified genes controlling pigmentation differences between spotted and non-spotted regions, demonstrating its capability to detect biologically significant expression patterns in non-model systems [28].

EDGE Applications in Plant Gene Function Validation

Gene Discovery in Non-Model Plants

EDGE has proven particularly effective for functional gene mining in medicinal plants and crops where genomic information is limited. In papaya (Carica papaya), researchers utilized a related tag-based method (SuperSAGE) to identify genes involved in sex determination by analyzing flower samples from male, female, and hermaphrodite plants [29]. Through sequencing of short transcript tags, they identified 312 unique sequences specifically mapped to sex chromosome sequences, including a candidate MADS-box gene potentially responsible for female determination [29]. This application demonstrates how tag-based transcriptomics can overcome challenges posed by complex genome structures that hinder conventional approaches.

Similarly, in cucumber (Cucumis sativus), tag-sequencing analysis enabled researchers to characterize transcriptome dynamics during waterlogging stress, identifying differentially expressed genes linked to carbon metabolism, photosynthesis, reactive oxygen species handling, and hormone signaling [29]. These discoveries provide crucial insights into stress adaptation mechanisms that can inform breeding programs for more resilient crop varieties. The ability of EDGE to detect subtle expression changes in signaling pathways makes it invaluable for understanding complex regulatory networks in plants.

Integration with Functional Validation Techniques

A significant strength of EDGE in plant gene function validation is its compatibility with downstream experimental approaches. The gene expression data generated by EDGE often serves as the starting point for more targeted functional studies using techniques such as Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS). In orchids, which have long life cycles (2-3 years to flowering), researchers developed a Cymbidium mosaic virus-based VIGS system to rapidly validate gene function without waiting for the entire growth cycle [6]. This approach enabled functional assessment of floral identity genes in less than two months instead of years, demonstrating how EDGE discovery can be efficiently coupled with experimental validation [6].

Another integrative framework is the NEEDLE pipeline, which uses network analysis of dynamic transcriptome data to identify transcription factors upstream of genes of interest [7]. This approach has been successfully applied to identify regulators of cellulose synthase-like F6 (CSLF6) genes in Brachypodium and sorghum, revealing evolutionarily conserved regulatory elements among grass species [7]. The following diagram illustrates how EDGE integrates within a comprehensive gene function validation pipeline:

Essential Research Toolkit for EDGE Experiments

Successful implementation of EDGE for plant gene validation requires specific reagents and computational tools. The following table outlines key components of the EDGE research toolkit:

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents and Tools for EDGE Experiments

Reagent/Tool	Function	Application Notes
EcoP15I Restriction Enzyme	Generates specific 27-bp tags from cDNA	Critical for standardized tag production [28]
Oligo(dT) Primers	cDNA synthesis from mRNA	Selects for polyadenylated transcripts
High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase	Library amplification	Maintains sequence accuracy during PCR
Illumina-Compatible Adapters	Sequencing library preparation	Includes barcodes for sample multiplexing
Trinity Assembly Software	De novo transcriptome assembly	Alternative when reference is unavailable [27]
NEEDLE Pipeline	Transcription factor identification	Identifies upstream regulators from expression data [7]
CymMV VIGS Vectors	Functional validation in plants	Enables rapid gene silencing in non-model species [6]
Diethyl(hexyl)methylsilane	Diethyl(hexyl)methylsilane
Threonine, 4,4-dichloro-	Threonine, 4,4-dichloro-, CAS:60191-68-6, MF:C4H7Cl2NO3, MW:188.01 g/mol	Chemical Reagent

For researchers studying non-model plants, the combination of EDGE for gene discovery with VIGS for functional validation represents a particularly powerful approach. The CymMV-based VIGS system has been successfully adapted for orchids, overcoming challenges posed by their large genome size, low transformation efficiency, and extended life cycle [6]. This methodological synergy significantly accelerates the pace of gene characterization in difficult-to-study species.

EDGE represents a robust, sensitive, and cost-effective solution for digital gene expression profiling in non-model plants, addressing critical challenges in functional genomics for species with limited genomic resources. Its advantages in detecting expression differences for poorly expressed genes, minimal technical noise, and absence of transcript length bias make it particularly suitable for plant gene validation studies [28]. When integrated with complementary approaches such as VIGS for functional assessment and network analysis tools like NEEDLE for regulator identification, EDGE provides a comprehensive framework for elucidating gene function in diverse plant species [7] [6].

As sequencing technologies continue to advance, tag-based methods like EDGE maintain their relevance by offering targeted, efficient transcriptome profiling that balances comprehensive coverage with practical feasibility. For plant biologists seeking to validate gene function in non-model species—whether for crop improvement, medicinal plant characterization, or basic biological discovery—EDGE provides a powerful methodological foundation that can accelerate research progress and overcome the limitations posed by complex genomes and extended life cycles.

The validation of gene function in non-model plants presents a significant challenge for modern plant biology. While omics technologies can identify thousands of candidate genes associated with adaptive traits, establishing causal relationships requires precise functional validation. This review systematically compares CRISPR-Cas-based genome editing technologies against conventional functional genomics approaches for gene validation in non-model plant systems. We evaluate the performance characteristics, experimental requirements, and practical applications of these methods, with a particular focus on their integration with multi-omics data streams. By providing structured comparisons of efficiency metrics, protocol details, and reagent specifications, this guide aims to equip researchers with the necessary framework to implement rapid in planta validation pipelines for characterizing gene function in evolutionarily and ecologically diverse plant species.

The functional characterization of genes in non-model plants is crucial for advancing our understanding of plant biology, ecology, and evolution. Traditional genetic approaches face significant limitations when applied to species with long life cycles, large genomes, or limited genetic resources [33]. The emergence of multi-omics technologies—including genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics—has dramatically accelerated the discovery of candidate genes involved in adaptive traits, disease resistance, and environmental responses [34]. However, these correlative approaches require complementary functional validation to establish causal relationships between gene sequence and phenotype.

Genome editing technologies, particularly the CRISPR-Cas system, have revolutionized functional genomics by enabling targeted genetic perturbations in diverse plant species [35]. When integrated with omics data, CRISPR-Cas provides a powerful platform for rapid in planta validation of gene function. This integration creates a discovery-validation pipeline where omics identifies candidate genes and CRISPR-Cas tests their functional significance, thereby bridging the gap between correlation and causation in plant gene function studies [34] [33].

Comparative Analysis of Functional Genomics Technologies

Performance Metrics Across Validation Platforms

We evaluated five major functional genomics technologies across key performance parameters relevant to non-model plant research. The comparison reveals distinct advantages and limitations for each approach (Table 1).

Table 1: Performance Comparison of Functional Genomics Technologies for Gene Validation in Plants

Technology	Induced Perturbation	Off-Target Effects	Multiplexing Capacity	Causative Gene Verification	Best Application Context
CRISPR Knockout	Targeted knockout via DSB	Low	High	Straightforward	Gene family functional redundancy analysis [36]
CRISPR Activation	Targeted gene upregulation	Low	High	Straightforward	Gain-of-function studies in redundant gene families [37]
Activation Tagging	Random gene activation	None	Moderate	Complicated	Genome-wide discovery of dominant phenotypes [36]
EMS Mutagenesis	Random point mutations	High	Low	Difficult	Saturation mutagenesis for trait discovery [36]
T-DNA Insertion	Random gene disruption	Low	Moderate	Moderate	Large-scale knockout collections [36]

CRISPR-based systems demonstrate superior performance for targeted validation of candidate genes identified through omics approaches. The precision of CRISPR knockout and activation systems enables direct linkage between specific genetic sequences and phenotypic outcomes, which is particularly valuable when working with candidate genes from association studies [36] [37]. The multiplexing capacity of CRISPR systems allows simultaneous validation of multiple candidate genes, significantly accelerating the functional screening process in non-model species where transformation efficiency may be limiting [36].

Integration Potential with Omics Data Streams

The effectiveness of functional validation technologies depends heavily on their compatibility with omics data types. Table 2 summarizes the integration capabilities of each platform with major omics approaches.

Table 2: Integration of Functional Genomics Technologies with Omics Data Types

Technology	Genomics Compatibility	Transcriptomics Compatibility	Proteomics Compatibility	Phenomics Compatibility
CRISPR Knockout	High (precise target mapping)	High (direct transcript effects)	Moderate (protein abundance changes)	High (precise trait mapping)
CRISPR Activation	High (promoter/proximal targeting)	High (transcript level measurement)	Moderate (protein abundance changes)	High (enhanced trait analysis)
Activation Tagging	Moderate (insertion mapping required)	High (differential expression)	Low (indirect effects)	Moderate (phenotype screening)
EMS Mutagenesis	Low (mapping difficult)	Low (multiple mutations)	Low (multiple mutations)	High (forward genetics)
T-DNA Insertion	Moderate (insertion mapping required)	High (knockdown verification)	Low (indirect effects)	Moderate (phenotype screening)

CRISPR platforms show exceptional compatibility with genomics data due to their target-specific nature, allowing direct validation of genes identified through genome-wide association studies (GWAS) or quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping [33]. The precise nature of CRISPR interventions generates clean transcriptional and phenotypic signatures that facilitate causal inference, unlike random mutagenesis approaches that introduce multiple confounding mutations [36] [37].

Experimental Framework for CRISPR-Mediated Validation

Workflow for Integrated Omics and Genome Editing

The following diagram illustrates the complete experimental pipeline for integrating omics discovery with CRISPR-based validation in non-model plants:

Critical Experimental Protocols and Methodologies

Target Selection and Guide RNA Design

Effective CRISPR-mediated validation begins with comprehensive in silico analysis of candidate genes. The protocol requires: (1) obtaining genomic DNA, mRNA, and coding sequences from species-specific databases; (2) mapping gene structure including intron/exon boundaries and alternative splicing variants; and (3) identifying conserved domains critical for protein function [38]. Guide RNAs should be designed to target exonic regions near the 5' end of the gene to maximize probability of generating frameshift mutations that cause premature stop codons [38].

Multiple sgRNA design tools should be used concurrently (CRISPR-P 2.0, CRISPR-direct, CHOPCHOP) with selection of "common" sgRNAs present across multiple platforms [38]. This comparative approach increases the likelihood of identifying highly efficient guides. For non-model species without dedicated databases, comparative genomics using closely related reference species can facilitate target identification. Essential parameters for guide selection include: (1) targeting all transcript variants; (2) predicted high efficiency scores; (3) minimal off-target potential; and (4) proximity to the start codon for knockout strategies [38].

Experimental Validation of Editing Efficiency

Prior to stable plant transformation, in vitro CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein (RNP) assays are recommended to validate sgRNA activity [38]. This protocol involves: (1) incubating target PCR fragments with synthesized sgRNAs and purified Cas9 protein; (2) digestion with mismatch-sensitive enzymes like T7 Endonuclease I or surveyor nuclease; and (3) quantification of cleavage efficiency via gel electrophoresis. This pre-validation step saves considerable time and resources by identifying functional sgRNAs before proceeding to plant transformation.

For additional validation, protoplast-based editing systems can provide rapid assessment of editing efficiency in plant cells [38]. The protocol involves: (1) isolating protoplasts from leaf tissue; (2) delivering CRISPR constructs via PEG-mediated transformation; (3) extracting DNA after 48-72 hours; and (4) sequencing target loci to detect mutations. This approach provides evidence of functionality in plant cellular environments before undertaking more labor-intensive stable transformation.

Research Reagent Solutions for Plant Genome Editing

Successful implementation of CRISPR-based validation requires specific reagent systems optimized for plant applications. Table 3 details essential research reagents and their applications in plant genome editing workflows.

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents for CRISPR-Based Plant Gene Validation

Reagent Category	Specific Examples	Function & Application	Considerations for Non-Model Species
CRISPR Nucleases	SpCas9, LbCas12a, Cas13	DNA/RNA targeting for knockout, knockdown, or base editing	Cas9 variants with alternative PAM requirements (e.g., SpCas9-NG) increase targetable sites [35]
Delivery Vectors	pRGEB31, pORE, Gateway-compatible vectors	Agrobacterium-mediated transformation or direct delivery	Species-specific promoters (e.g., Ubiquitin, Actin) often show higher expression than CaMV 35S [38]
Selection Markers	Hygromycin, Kanamycin, Bialaphos resistance genes	Selection of successfully transformed tissue	Fluorescent markers (e.g., GFP, RFP) enable visual selection without antibiotics [35]
Transcriptional Modulators	dCas9-VP64, dCas9-EDLL, dCas9-SRDX	Gene activation or repression without DNA cleavage	Plant-specific activators (e.g., EDLL) often outperform conventional activators [36] [37]
Validation Enzymes	T7 Endonuclease I, Surveyor Nuclease	Detection of CRISPR-induced mutations in target sites	In vitro RNP complex assays predict in planta efficiency [38]

Specialized Reagent Systems

For gain-of-function studies, CRISPR activation (CRISPRa) systems employ deactivated Cas9 (dCas9) fused to transcriptional activators like VP64, EDLL, or TAL activators [37]. These systems enable targeted gene upregulation without introducing DNA double-strand breaks, making them particularly valuable for validating genes where overexpression produces informative phenotypes. Recent advances include plant-specific programmable transcriptional activators (PTAs) that show enhanced efficiency in plant systems [37].

For loss-of-function studies, multiplexed CRISPR systems enable simultaneous targeting of multiple gene family members, addressing functional redundancy challenges common in plant genomes [36]. Modular vector systems like Golden Gate and MoClo facilitate rapid assembly of these multiplex constructs, allowing researchers to target up to 24 genes simultaneously in polyploid species or large gene families [36].

Technological Advances and Future Applications

Emerging CRISPR Platforms for Enhanced Validation

Beyond standard CRISPR-Cas9 systems, several advanced platforms offer unique capabilities for plant gene validation. Base editing systems enable precise nucleotide conversions without double-strand breaks, particularly valuable for validating single-nucleotide polymorphisms identified through association studies [35]. Prime editing further expands this capability by enabling all possible base-to-base conversions plus small insertions and deletions, though efficiency in plants requires further optimization.

For high-throughput validation, CRISPR library screening enables functional assessment of hundreds to thousands of genes simultaneously [36]. While established in model systems, adaptation to non-model plants requires optimization of transformation efficiency and streamlined phenotyping protocols. Compact CRISPR systems (e.g., Cas12f) offer advantages for delivery via viral vectors, potentially enabling transient validation assays without stable transformation [39].

Integration with Multi-Omics Data Streams

The most significant advances in plant gene validation come from tight integration of CRISPR platforms with multi-omics data. Single-cell RNA sequencing of CRISPR-treated populations can resolve cell-type-specific gene functions that are masked in bulk tissue analyses [39]. Spatial transcriptomics combined with targeted CRISPR interventions can further elucidate gene function in specific tissue contexts.

For non-model organisms with limited genomic resources, leveraging cross-species omics data can guide target selection for validation studies. The pipeline from comparative genomics to CRISPR validation enables functional annotation of conserved genes across evolutionary lineages, advancing our understanding of gene function beyond traditional model systems [33].

The integration of omics technologies with CRISPR-based genome editing has created a powerful paradigm for rapid in planta validation of gene function in non-model plants. This synergistic approach leverages the discovery power of high-throughput omics with the precise intervention capabilities of genome editing, enabling causal relationships between gene sequence and phenotype to be established with unprecedented efficiency. As CRISPR technologies continue to evolve and omics methods become more accessible, this integrated validation pipeline will dramatically accelerate functional genomics across the plant kingdom, with significant implications for basic plant biology, crop improvement, and conservation of plant biodiversity in changing environments.

Plant synthetic biology applies engineering principles to design and construct novel biological systems, offering sustainable solutions for producing high-value natural products. A central challenge in the field is the selection of an optimal chassis organism—a host platform capable of efficiently expressing reconstructed biosynthetic pathways. Among the available hosts, Nicotiana benthamiana, a relative of tobacco, has emerged as a premier versatile chassis for pathway reconstruction and the production of complex plant natural products. This review objectively compares the performance of N. benthamiana with other production systems, detailing its application in elucidating and validating gene functions from non-model organisms. We provide a systematic analysis of experimental data, methodologies, and key reagents that establish N. benthamiana as a powerful platform for plant synthetic biology, enabling the green manufacturing of pharmaceuticals, nutraceuticals, and other bioactive compounds.

WhyNicotiana benthamiana? A Comparative Analysis of Chassis Performance

Nicotiana benthamiana has become a favored host in plant synthetic biology due to a confluence of advantageous traits. It is an economically important non-food plant with a short life cycle, high biomass yield (approximately 100 tons per hectare), and exceptional amenability to Agrobacterium-mediated transformation via agroinfiltration [40]. This transient expression system allows for the rapid introduction of multiple genes directly into leaf tissue without genomic integration, enabling rapid testing of biosynthetic pathways—often within a matter of days [41] [40]. Unlike microbial systems, N. benthamiana natively possesses the intricate metabolic networks, compartmentalized enzymatic processes, and eukaryotic protein modification machinery essential for the biosynthesis of complex plant-derived metabolites [41].

The table below provides a quantitative comparison of N. benthamiana with other common chassis for the production of plant natural products.

Table 1: Performance Comparison of Chassis for Plant Natural Product Production

Chassis	Example Product	Yield	Time to Production	Key Advantages	Key Limitations
Nicotiana benthamiana	Glyceollin I & II [42]	Up to 5.9 g/kg (Dry Weight)	1-2 weeks (transient)	Rapid transient expression; native eukaryotic machinery; high biomass	Background metabolism can derivatize products [43]
	Strictosidine [43]	Successful reconstitution	1-2 weeks (transient)
	Chrysoeriol [40]	Peak at 10 days post-infiltration	10 days (transient)
	Medicarpin [42]	0.7 g/kg (Dry Weight)	1-2 weeks (transient)
Yeast (S. cerevisiae)	Artemisinic Acid [40]	25 g/L [40]	Months (stable strain)	Scalable fermentation; controlled environment	Difficulty expressing some plant P450s; metabolic burden [41]
	Strictosidine [43]	Requires extensive strain optimization	Months (stable strain)
Bacteria (E. coli)	Terpenoid Precursors [41]	Varies	Months (stable strain)	Fast growth; high transformation efficiency	Inability to perform complex eukaryotic post-translational modifications; toxicity of some products [41]

As the data indicates, N. benthamiana excels in rapid, high-yield production of structurally diverse compounds. While microbial systems can achieve incredibly high volumetric yields in optimized bioreactors, their development cycle is lengthy and they often struggle with the functional expression of plant-specific enzymes, particularly cytochrome P450s [41]. The N. benthamiana platform bypasses these issues, making it ideal for initial pathway discovery and validation, especially for genes sourced from non-model plants that are difficult to transform.

Engineering the Chassis: Strategies for Enhanced Performance

A significant challenge in using N. benthamiana is its rich endogenous metabolism, which can derivatize heterologously produced intermediates into unwanted side-products. A prominent example is the glycosylation of early iridoid pathway intermediates by native glycosyltransferases (UGTs), leading to dead-end metabolites [43]. Research has successfully addressed this by employing CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis to create knockout plant lines for specific UGTs. When the early monoterpene indole alkaloid (MIA) pathway was expressed in these engineered lines, a more favorable product profile with fewer derivatized compounds was observed [43]. This demonstrates that targeted genome editing can enhance the fidelity and yield of target compounds in N. benthamiana.

Other successful metabolic engineering strategies include:

• Screening high-efficiency enzyme orthologs from various plant species to identify variants with superior activity in the host context [42].
• Co-expressing transcription factors that naturally regulate the pathway of interest to boost overall metabolic flux [42].
• Utilizing protein engineering, such as the inclusion of a major latex protein-like enzyme (MLPL) from catmint, which was critical for improving flux through the iridoid pathway for strictosidine biosynthesis [43].

These engineering efforts transform N. benthamiana from a simple expression host into a tailored, high-performance production chassis.

Experimental Protocols for Pathway Reconstruction

The standard workflow for reconstructing a plant biosynthetic pathway in N. benthamiana follows the Design-Build-Test-Learn (DBTL) cycle, a cornerstone of synthetic biology [40] [44]. The following protocols detail the key experimental steps.

Agroinfiltration for Transient Expression

This is the primary method for introducing genes into N. benthamiana leaves [10] [40].

• Vector Construction: Clone genes of interest (GOIs) into a binary vector under the control of strong constitutive promoters (e.g., Cauliflower Mosaic Virus 35S promoter).
• Agrobacterium Transformation: Introduce the binary vector into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains such as GV3101.
• Culture Preparation: Grow transformed Agrobacterium in TY or LB medium with appropriate antibiotics until the culture reaches an optical density at 600 nm (OD₆₀₀) of ~1.0-2.0.
• Cell Harvesting and Resuspension: Pellet the bacterial cells by centrifugation and resuspend in an infiltration buffer (e.g., containing 10 mM MES, 10 mM MgClâ‚‚, and 150 µM acetosyringone) to a final OD₆₀₀ typically between 0.1 and 1.0.
• Infiltration: Using a syringe without a needle, gently press the tip against the abaxial side of a young N. benthamiana leaf (3-5 weeks old) and infiltrate the bacterial suspension. The infiltrated area will appear water-soaked.
• Incubation: Maintain the infiltrated plants under standard growth conditions for several days to allow for protein expression and metabolite production.

Multi-Gene Assembly and Expression

To reconstruct entire pathways, multiple genes must be co-expressed. This is achieved by:

• Co-infiltration: Mixing multiple Agrobacterium strains, each carrying a different gene, and infiltrating the mixture [43]. The optimal density for each strain in the mixture may require empirical adjustment to balance expression levels.
• Multigene Vectors: Assembling multiple transcription units within a single T-DNA region of a binary vector, ensuring coordinated delivery of all pathway genes [40].

Metabolite Analysis and Validation

After a suitable incubation period (typically 5-10 days), the infiltrated leaf tissue is harvested for analysis.

• Metabolite Extraction: Grind the leaf tissue in a suitable solvent (e.g., methanol or ethanol) to extract metabolites.
• Product Detection and Quantification: Analyze the extracts using high-resolution mass spectrometry (HR-MS) or liquid/gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/GC-MS) [43] [41]. These techniques confirm the identity and quantity of the target compound.
• Functional Validation: For antimicrobial compounds like glyceollins, bioassays can be performed. For example, test the extracted compounds against plant pathogens such as Phytophthora sojae to confirm bioactivity [42].

The following diagram illustrates the logical workflow for pathway reconstruction and validation in N. benthamiana.

Figure 1: Workflow for Pathway Reconstruction in N. benthamiana

Case Studies in Pathway Reconstruction and Validation

Reconstruction of Monoterpene Indole Alkaloid (MIA) Biosynthesis

The MIA pathway produces over 3000 compounds, including anti-cancer drugs vinblastine and vincristine. Researchers successfully reconstituted the biosynthesis of strictosidine, the universal MIA precursor, in N. benthamiana by co-expressing 14 enzymes [43]. A critical finding was that a major latex protein-like enzyme (MLPL) from catmint was essential for improving flux. Furthermore, to circumvent the problem of endogenous glycosyltransferases derivatizing pathway intermediates, the team used transcriptomics to identify the responsible UGTs and created Cas9-mutated N. benthamiana lines. Expressing the pathway in these engineered lines resulted in a cleaner product profile, showcasing how the host's metabolism can be tailored for better performance [43].

Production of Soybean Phytoalexins (Glyceollins)

Glyceollins are valuable antimicrobial and anti-cancer isoflavones from soybean, but they accumulate only in trace amounts during pathogen attack. A groundbreaking study engineered a high-yield N. benthamiana chassis that accumulated the key isoflavone precursors genistein and daidzein at 11.8 g/kg and 7.0 g/kg dry weight, respectively [42]. Using this platform, the team decoded the complete glyceollin pathway, identifying six novel cytochrome P450 monooxygenases as the long-sought glyceollin synthases (GSs). This led to the de novo production of glyceollin I and II at 2.6 g/kg and 5.9 g/kg dry weight, respectively [42]. The study highlights N. benthamiana's power not only for production but also for discovering and validating genes from non-model crops.

The following diagram visualizes the simplified chrysoeriol biosynthesis pathway engineered into N. benthamiana.

Figure 2: Engineered Chrysoeriol Biosynthesis Pathway

Synthesis of the Flavone Chrysoeriol

Researchers simplified the natural 8-step chrysoeriol biosynthetic pathway to a 4-step process using five enzymes and assembled them into a single multigene vector [40]. After agroinfiltration into N. benthamiana, chrysoeriol production peaked at 10 days post-infiltration and was associated with increased antioxidant activity in the leaves. This case study demonstrates the ability to streamline and reconstruct non-native flavonoid pathways in this chassis efficiently.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

The following table catalogs key reagents and tools essential for conducting pathway reconstruction in N. benthamiana.

Table 2: Essential Research Reagents for N. benthamiana Pathway Engineering

Reagent / Tool	Function / Description	Example Use Case
Binary Vectors (e.g., pCAMBIA, pEAQ)	Plasmid vectors for transferring genes into plants via Agrobacterium; contain T-DNA borders.	Cloning genes of interest for expression in plants [43] [40].
Agrobacterium Strains (e.g., GV3101, LBA4404)	Soil bacterium used as a vector to deliver T-DNA into plant cells.	Performing agroinfiltration for transient gene expression [10] [40].
Strong Constitutive Promoters (e.g., CaMV 35S)	DNA sequences that drive high-level, continuous expression of transgenes.	Ensuring sufficient production of pathway enzymes [40].
CRISPR/Cas9 System	Genome editing tool for targeted mutagenesis of host genes.	Knocking out endogenous glycosyltransferases to prevent off-target metabolism [43].
High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry (HR-MS)	Analytical technique for precise identification and quantification of metabolites.	Detecting and confirming the production of target compounds like strictosidine [43].
Glycosyltransferase (UGT) Knockout Lines	Genetically engineered N. benthamiana lines with mutations in specific UGT genes.	Providing a "cleaner" chassis background for pathways prone to glycosylation [43].
2-Mercaptothienothiazole	2-Mercaptothienothiazole|CAS 55116-20-6|Supplier

Nicotiana benthamiana has firmly established itself as a versatile and powerful chassis for reconstructing complex plant biosynthetic pathways. Its unique combination of rapid scalability, eukaryotic protein expression machinery, and compatibility with transient transformation makes it an indispensable tool for both the production of valuable natural products and the functional validation of genes from non-model organisms. Quantitative data demonstrates its capability to achieve gram-per-kilogram yields of complex molecules, rivaling and in some aspects surpassing microbial systems in speed and versatility. While challenges such as background metabolism exist, they are being systematically addressed through genome engineering, turning N. benthamiana into an increasingly refined biofactory. As plant synthetic biology continues to evolve, N. benthamiana will undoubtedly remain a cornerstone organism for the green and sustainable manufacturing of pharmaceuticals, fine chemicals, and agricultural products.

Solving Common Problems and Enhancing Experimental Success Rates

Addressing Technical Noise and Artifacts in Transcriptome Assembly and Analysis

In the field of plant genomics, research on non-model organisms is crucial for understanding evolutionary diversity, stress adaptation, and developing climate-resilient crops. However, a significant challenge in this research is the validation of gene function, a process heavily dependent on high-quality transcriptome assembly and analysis. Technical noise and artifacts introduced during sequencing and computational analysis can severely compromise the accuracy of gene models, leading to erroneous functional annotations. This guide objectively compares prevailing methodologies for transcriptome assembly and analysis, with a focus on their performance in mitigating technical artifacts, and provides a structured framework for researchers to select appropriate tools for validating gene function in non-model plant species.

Table 1: Comparison of RNA-Seq Approaches for Non-Model Plant Studies

Feature	Whole Transcriptome (WTS) / Total RNA-Seq	3' mRNA-Seq	Long-Read RNA-Seq (lrRNA-seq)
Primary Use Case	Global view of all RNA types; isoform discovery, alternative splicing, novel gene identification [45].	Accurate, cost-effective gene expression quantification; high-throughput screening of many samples [45].	Full-length transcript capture; superior isoform detection and quantification; direct RNA modification analysis [46] [47].
Key Strengths	Detects more differentially expressed genes; provides information on splicing and non-coding RNAs [45].	Streamlined workflow; simpler data analysis; robust with degraded RNA (e.g., FFPE); requires less sequencing depth [45].	Resolves complex paralogous regions; identifies novel isoforms without reference bias; captures complete splice variants [46].
Limitations & Technical Artifacts	Sensitive to RNA degradation; requires high input RNA quality (RIN >7); rRNA depletion can introduce variability and off-target effects [48] [45].	Relies on well-annotated 3' UTRs; may miss non-polyadenylated RNAs and regulatory features at the 5' end [45].	Higher error rates leading to misassembly; requires specialized basecalling (e.g., DEMINERS); computationally intensive; high input requirements [46] [47].
Typical Read Depth	High (e.g., 30-50 million reads/sample) to ensure sufficient transcript coverage [45].	Low (e.g., 1-5 million reads/sample) due to localization at the 3' end [45].	Variable; longer, more accurate reads often outperform simply increasing read depth for isoform detection [46].
Best Suited for Validation	Isoform-specific function, long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) activity, splice variants.	Differential gene expression studies across large sample sets or time courses.	Definitive isoform structure, gene fusion events, and allele-specific expression in complex genomes.

Sample Preparation and Library Construction

The integrity of the starting RNA material is a critical first step. Degraded RNA can introduce severe biases, particularly against the 5' ends of transcripts and longer RNA species [48]. RNA Integrity Number (RIN) greater than 7 is generally recommended for high-quality sequencing, though this can vary by sample type [48].

• Poly(A) Selection vs. Ribosomal RNA Depletion: The choice here dictates which RNA biotypes are captured. Poly(A) selection enriches for messenger and long non-coding RNAs with poly-A tails but will miss non-polyadenylated RNAs. Ribosomal RNA (rRNA) depletion, which removes the abundant rRNA (~80% of cellular RNA), allows for the sequencing of other non-coding RNAs but can be variable and may have off-target effects on some genes of interest [48].
• Stranded vs. Unstranded Libraries: Stranded library protocols preserve the information about which DNA strand the RNA was transcribed from. This is crucial for accurately identifying overlapping transcripts on opposite strands and for determining the correct orientation of non-coding RNAs, reducing misannotation [48].

Sequencing Platform and Analysis Pipeline Selection

The choice between short-read and long-read sequencing technologies has profound implications for transcriptome assembly.

• Short-Read Assembly Artifacts: While cost-effective, short-read sequencing requires computational assembly of fragmented transcripts, which can lead to misassembled paralogs, fragmented transcripts, and the failure to distinguish between alternative isoforms of the same gene. This is particularly problematic in non-model plant species, which often have complex, polyploid genomes [49].
• Long-Read Sequencing Advantages and Challenges: Long-read technologies from PacBio and Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) sequence full-length cDNA or direct RNA, dramatically improving the accuracy of isoform-level reconstruction [46]. However, they have historically suffered from higher error rates. Basecalling accuracy is a major source of technical noise; for example, standard ONT direct RNA sequencing has a median basecalling accuracy of ~86%, which can hinder the detection of short exons and splice junctions [47]. Newer tools like DEMINERS, which use species-specific basecalling models, have been developed to address this, pushing accuracy higher [47].

The computational pipeline used for assembly and quantification is an equally significant source of variation. A recent consortium study (LRGASP) found that different bioinformatics tools applied to the same long-read dataset can report vastly different numbers of transcripts (varying up to tenfold) with low pairwise correlation in quantification results [46].

Table 2: Performance of Selected Genome Annotation and Transcript Assembly Tools

Tool	Method	Key Strengths	Documented Limitations
BRAKER3 [49]	Combines protein and RNA-seq evidence to train gene prediction Hidden Markov Models (HMMs).	Consistently top performer in BUSCO recovery across diverse species (vertebrates, plants, insects); works well even without a closely related reference genome [49].	Performance may depend on the quality and evolutionary distance of the protein evidence provided.
StringTie2 [49]	Graph-based framework to assemble transcripts from splice-aware alignments of RNA-seq reads.	Consistently top performer; directly uses RNA-seq data which improves annotations when whole-genome alignment is not feasible [49].	In long-read benchmarks, it showed lower long-read coverage (~45%) for its transcript models, suggesting reliance on other information [46].
TOGA [49]	Annotation transfer method using whole-genome alignments.	Top performer for sensitivity and specificity, especially in vertebrates; exon-aware lifting [49].	Performance can be lower in some monocots; requires a high-quality reference genome for transfer [49].
Bambu [46]	Reference-based method for long-read data.	Reports a high percentage of known transcripts with low false-positive novel discoveries; well-suited for well-annotated genomes [46].	Transcript models can have lower long-read coverage (~60%), indicating potential over-reliance on reference annotations [46].
FLAIR & Mandalorion [46]	De novo focused methods for long-read data.	Effective at detecting novel transcripts (NIC) with good experimental support for transcript ends [46].	Can exhibit variability in the number of novel transcripts reported and may require orthogonal validation [46].

Experimental Protocols for Validation

Given the technical noise inherent in any single method, a multi-faceted experimental approach is essential for robust validation of plant gene function.

Orthogonal Validation with Complementary Omics Data

Integrating data from multiple, independent methods is the most effective strategy to confirm transcript models.

• Short-Rread RNA-Seq: Use short-read data to validate splice junctions predicted by long-read assemblies. In benchmark studies, junctions supported by Illumina reads were a key metric for accuracy [46].
• Cap Analysis of Gene Expression (CAGE) and QuantSeq: These technologies provide independent confirmation of Transcription Start Sites (TSS) and Transcription Termination Sites (TTS), respectively. This is critical for validating the ends of transcript models, a known weakness of some assembly pipelines [46].
• Proteomics: Mass spectrometry data confirming the presence of peptides encoded by a predicted novel transcript or isoform provides powerful, physical evidence for its existence and translation.

Protocol: Using DAP-Seq to Map Transcriptional Regulatory Networks

For validating transcription factors (TFs) identified via transcriptomics, DNA Affinity Purification sequencing (DAP-Seq) offers a powerful functional assay, especially in non-model plants where antibodies or stable transformations are not feasible.

Methodology:

• Cloning and Expression: Clone the open reading frame of the candidate TF from your plant species of interest into an expression vector with an affinity tag (e.g., GST, His-tag).
• TF Binding In Vitro: Express and purify the recombinant TF protein. Incubate it with genomic DNA from the same species, which has been sheared and attached to sequencing adapters.
• Affinity Purification: Use beads coated with an antibody against the affinity tag to pull down the TF and any bound genomic DNA fragments.
• Sequencing and Analysis: Sequence the bound DNA fragments. Map the sequences to the reference genome (if available) or a de novo assembly to identify the genomic regions (putative promoters, enhancers) bound by the TF. This directly links the TF to the genes it may regulate [50].

This protocol is currently being applied in projects, such as mapping the regulatory network for drought tolerance in poplar trees [50].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Item	Function in Transcriptome Analysis
PAXgene RNA Tubes	Stabilizes RNA in blood and difficult-to-preserve plant tissues at the point of collection, preventing degradation and preserving accurate transcript levels [48].
Oligo(dT) Beads	Selects for polyadenylated RNA (mRNA and some lncRNAs) during library prep, simplifying the transcriptome but excluding non-polyadenylated RNAs [48] [45].
Ribosomal RNA Depletion Kits	Uses probes to remove abundant rRNA, allowing sequencing of non-coding RNAs. Kits based on RNaseH-mediated degradation may offer better reproducibility than bead-based methods [48].
SIRV Spike-in RNA Variants	A set of synthetic RNA controls with known sequences and ratios spiked into the sample. Used to benchmark the accuracy of transcript identification and quantification across different platforms and pipelines [46].
RNA Transcription Adapters (RTAs)	In multiplexed long-read sequencing (e.g., with DEMINERS), unique RTAs are ligated to different samples, allowing them to be pooled and sequenced together, reducing costs and batch effects [47].

Workflow and Decision Diagrams

Diagram 1: Transcriptome Analysis for Non-Model Plants

Diagram 2: Mitigating Technical Noise

Accurate validation of gene function in non-model plants is a journey through a landscape of potential technical artifacts. There is no single flawless method; each—whether short-read, long-read, or a specific computational pipeline—introduces distinct biases and noise. The most robust strategy is not to seek a perfect tool, but to embrace a multi-layered, orthogonal approach. This involves carefully selecting the sequencing method based on the biological question, using a benchmarked computational pipeline, and, most importantly, validating key findings with independent experimental data. By systematically addressing technical noise, researchers can build a solid foundation for the discovery and validation of genes that underpin the valuable traits in the vast and diverse world of non-model plants.

Optimizing Transformation and Regeneration Hurdles in Diverse Plant Species

The validation of gene function is a cornerstone of modern plant biology, enabling advancements in crop improvement and molecular breeding. However, this research is often impeded in non-model organisms by the absence of efficient and reliable regeneration and genetic transformation protocols. Establishing such systems is a critical prerequisite for applying powerful techniques like CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing or functional complementation. This guide objectively compares two recently optimized experimental frameworks developed for species lacking robust genetic tools: the Amur daylily (Hemerocallis middendorffii) and broomcorn millet (Panicum miliaceum L.). By synthesizing the quantitative data and detailed methodologies from these studies, we provide a resource to help researchers select and adapt protocols for their specific plant systems.

Comparative Analysis of Transformation Systems

The following section provides a direct, data-driven comparison of the two optimized protocols, highlighting key experimental parameters and their outcomes to facilitate an objective evaluation.

The table below consolidates the core quantitative results from the two studies, offering a clear comparison of their performance [51] [52].

Table 1: Comparative Performance of Optimized Plant Transformation Systems

Performance Metric	Hemerocallis middendorffii [51]	Panicum miliaceum (Broomcorn Millet) [52]
Target Species	Amur daylily (ornamental, stress-tolerant)	Broomcorn millet (cereal, stress-tolerant)
Explant Source	Aerial parts of seed-derived plantlets	Mature seeds (dehusked)
Key Optimized Factor	Plant Growth Regulators (PGRs)	Plant Growth Regulators (PGRs)
Callus Induction Rate	95.6%	Information not specified
Regeneration Rate	84.4%	Information not specified
Transformation Efficiency	11.9%	21.25%
Transformation Positive Rate	32.8%	Information not specified

Detailed Experimental Protocols and Parameters

The success of both systems hinged on the meticulous optimization of media components and transformation conditions. The tables in this section detail the specific, optimized parameters for each protocol [51] [52].

Table 2: Optimized In Vitro Regeneration Protocols

Protocol Step	Hemerocallis middendorffii [51]	Panicum miliaceum (Broomcorn Millet) [52]
Basal Medium	Murashige and Skoog (MS) salts [51]	MS salts (with vitamins) [52]
Callus Induction	Supplemented with optimized 6-BA and NAA concentrations [51]	2.5 mg/L 2,4-D; 0.5 mg/L 6-BAP [52]
Callus Proliferation	Induction medium + 0.1 mg/L 2,4-D [51]	Not specified
Shoot Regeneration	Optimized 6-BA and NAA concentrations [51]	2.0 mg/L 6-BAP; 0.5 mg/L NAA [52]
Rooting	Half-strength MS salts with sucrose [51]	Half-strength MS salts with sucrose [52]

Table 3: Optimized Genetic Transformation Parameters

Parameter	Hemerocallis middendorffii [51]	Panicum miliaceum (Broomcorn Millet) [52]
Vector System	Agrobacterium tumefaciens with HmFT gene [51]	Agrobacterium tumefaciens EHA105 with pRHVcGFP [52]
Selection Agent	Hygromycin (9 mg·L⁻¹) [51]	Hygromycin (20 mg·L⁻¹) [52]
Agrobacterium Density (OD₆₀₀)	0.6 [51]	0.5 [52]
Acetosyringone Concentration	100 μmol·L⁻¹ [51]	200 μmol·L⁻¹ [52]
Co-cultivation Time	2 days [51]	3 days [52]
Antibiotic for Agrobacterium Control	Timentin (300 mg·L⁻¹) [51]	Timentin (300 mg·L⁻¹) [52]

Visualizing the Optimized Workflow for Broomcorn Millet

The optimized protocol for broomcorn millet can be conceptualized as a linear workflow with critical, optimized parameters influencing the outcome at each stage. The following diagram maps this process [52].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

The successful implementation of the protocols described above relies on a set of core reagents. This table lists these essential materials and their functions in the experimental pipeline [51] [52].

Table 4: Essential Reagents for Plant Regeneration and Transformation

Research Reagent	Function and Role in the Protocol
Murashige and Skoog (MS) Basal Medium	Provides essential inorganic salts, vitamins, and nutrients to support plant cell and tissue growth in culture [51] [52].
Plant Growth Regulators (PGRs)	Hormones like 2,4-D, 6-BAP, and NAA are critical for directing cellular processes, including callus induction (2,4-D) and shoot/root organogenesis (6-BAP, NAA) [51] [52].
Agrobacterium tumefaciens	A soil bacterium genetically engineered with a binary vector (e.g., pRHVcGFP); serves as the vehicle for transferring foreign DNA into the plant genome [51] [52].
Hygromycin	An antibiotic used as a selection agent. Only transformed plant cells expressing the hygromycin phosphotransferase (hpt) gene can survive and proliferate on medium containing this antibiotic [51] [52].
Acetosyringone	A phenolic compound that activates the Vir genes of Agrobacterium, enhancing its ability to transfer T-DNA into the plant cell, thereby increasing transformation efficiency [51] [52].
Timentin	A broad-spectrum antibiotic mixture used in plant tissue culture not for plant selection, but to eliminate or prevent the overgrowth of Agrobacterium after co-cultivation [51] [52].
Binary Vector	A plasmid containing the gene of interest (e.g., HmFT, GFP) and a selectable marker gene (e.g., hpt), both flanked by T-DNA borders, which is mobilized into the plant genome by Agrobacterium [51] [52].

Improving Accuracy in Variant Effect Prediction with AI and Machine Learning Models

In the field of plant genomics, accurately predicting the functional consequences of genetic variants is a cornerstone for understanding trait formation, accelerating breeding, and validating gene function. This challenge is particularly acute in non-model organisms, which lack the extensive annotated genomes and experimental data available for staple crops like rice and Arabidopsis. Traditional methods for variant effect prediction (VEP), often reliant on conservation scores and statistical associations, struggle with the complex genomes, high repetitive content, and rapid functional turnover characteristic of many non-model plants [53].

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) is revolutionizing this domain. Modern VEP tools can move beyond simple sequence homology to model the complex biophysical and functional constraints encoded within genetic sequences themselves. This guide provides an objective comparison of these new computational approaches, framing their performance within the critical need for robust gene function validation in non-model plant research.

Comparative Analysis of AI-Driven VEP Tools

The following tools represent different classes of AI/ML models applied to the problem of variant effect prediction. Their performance, applicability, and underlying methodologies vary significantly.

Table 1: Comparison of AI/ML Models for Variant Effect Prediction

Tool Name	Model Type	Primary Application	Key Strengths	Reported Performance	Limitations / Challenges
ESM1b (Evolutionary Scale Modeling) [54]	Protein Language Model (PLM)	Missense & coding variant effects	Unsupervised; requires no multiple sequence alignments (MSA); genome-wide coverage.	ROC-AUC: 0.905 (ClinVar pathogenic vs. benign classification) [54]	Performance drops in intrinsically disordered regions [55]; limited to coding sequences.
AlphaMissense [55]	Deep Learning (combines AF2 & population data)	Missense variant pathogenicity	Integrates structural context from AlphaFold2; high specificity.	>90% sensitivity/specificity overall; lower sensitivity in disordered regions [55]	Relies on AF2 confidence, which is low for disordered protein regions [55].
ShortStop [56]	Machine Learning Framework	Microprotein discovery & functional prediction from smORFs	Optimizes discovery by filtering functional from non-functional candidates; works with common RNA-seq data.	Identified 210 new microprotein candidates in lung cancer data; validated one associated with lung cancer [56]	Specialized for microproteins/smORFs; does not predict effects of single-nucleotide variants.
motifDiff [57]	Biophysical Model (PWM-based)	Non-coding variant effects on TF binding	Highly scalable & interpretable; models TF-DNA interaction mechanics.	Can score millions of variants in minutes; validated on allele-specific binding datasets [57]	Limited to variants within transcription factor binding sites.
GPN-MSA [58]	Foundation Model (with MSA)	Functional variant prediction in non-coding regions	Incorporates multi-species alignment data to enhance prediction.	Improved generalization for non-coding variants [58]	Requires multi-species alignments, which can be challenging for non-model plants.

Table 2: Performance on Specific Variant Types and Genomic Contexts

Tool / Model	Coding Variants	Non-Coding Variants	Performance in Ordered Protein Regions	Performance in Disordered Protein Regions
ESM1b	Excellent [54]	Not Applicable	High Accuracy [55]	Lower Sensitivity [55]
AlphaMissense	Excellent [55]	Not Applicable	High Accuracy [55]	Lower Sensitivity [55]
ShortStop	Not Applicable	Excellent (for smORF discovery) [56]	Not Applicable	Not Applicable
motifDiff	Not Applicable	Excellent (for TF binding sites) [57]	Not Applicable	Not Applicable
GPN-MSA	Limited	Excellent [58]	Not Applicable	Not Applicable

Experimental Protocols for VEP Validation

For researchers employing these tools, especially in non-model systems, rigorous validation is paramount. Below are detailed methodologies for key experiments cited in the evaluation of VEP tools.

Protocol: Deep Mutational Scanning (DMS) for Experimental Benchmarking

Purpose: To generate a ground-truth dataset for evaluating the accuracy of computational VEPs like ESM1b by measuring the functional impact of thousands of variants in parallel [54].

Workflow:

• Library Construction: Create a saturated mutagenesis library for the target gene, introducing a wide spectrum of single-amino-acid variants.
• Functional Selection: Introduce the variant library into a cellular system and apply a selective pressure that links gene function to survival or a measurable phenotype (e.g., antibiotic resistance, fluorescence).
• Sequencing & Quantification: Use high-throughput sequencing (e.g., Illumina) to quantify the abundance of each variant in the population both before and after selection.
• Enrichment Score Calculation: For each variant, calculate a functional score based on its change in frequency post-selection. This score serves as the experimental measure of variant effect.

Protocol: Identification and Validation of Microproteins with ShortStop

Purpose: To discover and prioritize functional microproteins from small Open Reading Frames (smORFs) in non-model plants [56].

Workflow:

• Data Input: Compile RNA-sequencing datasets from tissues of interest under different conditions (e.g., stress, disease).
• smORF Detection: Use ShortStop to scan transcriptomic data for putative smORFs, which are short sequences with coding potential.
• Functional Prioritization: ShortStop employs its machine learning framework to compare identified smORFs against a negative control set of random decoys, predicting which are most likely to be biologically functional.
• Experimental Validation:
  • Mass Spectrometry: Confirm the translation of the predicted microprotein in vivo.
  • Knock-out/Knock-down: Use CRISPR/Cas9 or RNAi to disrupt the smORF and observe phenotypic consequences (e.g., altered disease resistance, developmental defects).

Protocol: In Vivo Validation of Non-Coding Variants with motifDiff

Purpose: To experimentally test the impact of non-coding variants predicted to alter transcription factor (TF) binding [57].

Workflow:

• Variant Effect Scoring: Run motifDiff on a set of non-coding variants from a population study or QTL analysis to predict their effect on TF binding affinity.
• Reporter Assay Construction: Clone the genomic region containing the variant (and its reference allele) upstream of a minimal promoter driving a reporter gene (e.g., Luciferase, GFP).
• Transient Transfection: Introduce the reporter constructs into plant protoplasts or cell lines, with or without co-transfection of the relevant TF.
• Activity Measurement: Quantify reporter gene activity. A significant difference in activity between the reference and alternative allele constructs validates the predicted disruptive (or enhancing) effect of the variant.

VEP Tool Selection Workflow

The Scientist's Toolkit: Key Research Reagents & Materials

Successful application and validation of VEP tools in non-model plants require a combination of computational and wet-lab resources.

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents and Solutions for VEP

Reagent / Resource	Category	Function in VEP Workflow	Example Use-Case
High-Quality Genome Assembly	Genomic Resource	Serves as the reference for variant calling and functional annotation; critical for non-model organisms.	Provides the sequence context for tools like motifDiff and ShortStop to operate accurately [59].
RNA-seq Datasets	Transcriptomic Data	Enables discovery of expressed sequences and smORFs; used for eQTL mapping.	Primary input for the ShortStop tool to find functional microproteins [56].
Mass Spectrometry	Analytical Instrument	Confirms the translation of predicted small open reading frames (smORFs) into microproteins.	Validates ShortStop predictions by detecting the translated microprotein in plant tissues [56].
CRISPR/Cas9 System	Gene Editing Tool	Creates knock-out mutants to test the in vivo function of genes or regulatory elements harboring variants.	Determines the phenotypic impact of a variant predicted to be damaging by ESM1b [53].
Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay Kit	Molecular Biology Reagent	Quantifies the effect of non-coding variants on transcriptional regulation.	Validates predictions from motifDiff that a variant alters enhancer/promoter activity [57].
GPU Computing Cluster	Computational Resource	Accelerates the training and inference of large AI models like ESM1b and foundation models.	Essential for running protein language models on a genome-wide scale in a feasible time [54].

The advent of AI and ML models has provided plant scientists with an unprecedented toolkit for probing the "dark side" of plant genomes, from interpreting single nucleotide changes to discovering entirely new classes of functional elements like microproteins [56]. While no single tool is universally perfect—as evidenced by the lower performance in disordered regions [55]—the synergistic use of different models tailored to specific genomic contexts offers a powerful strategy.

For the researcher focused on non-model organisms, the path forward involves a careful, multi-pronged approach: selecting the appropriate VEP tool based on the variant type, acknowledging the limitations of each model, and, most critically, integrating computational predictions with robust experimental validation in the target species. This combined methodology is key to unlocking a deeper understanding of plant gene function and accelerating the development of improved, resilient crops.

The study of non-model plants is crucial for understanding evolutionary relationships, developmental biology, and specialized adaptations in the plant kingdom [6]. However, functional genomics in these species faces formidable obstacles, including large genome sizes, low transformation efficiency, long regeneration times, and extended life cycles that can span years [6] [60]. The emergence of cloud-based genomic data analysis has transformed this field by providing accessible, scalable computational resources that overcome these traditional barriers. Cloud computing platforms now offer researchers the ability to process ultra-large-scale genomic datasets without significant local infrastructure investments, making large-scale genomic studies of non-model plants increasingly feasible [61] [62] [63].

For plant researchers investigating gene function in non-model species, cloud platforms provide not just raw computing power but specialized environments for managing complex analytical workflows. These resources are particularly valuable for studying processes like polyploidy, apomixis, and reticulate evolution in phylogenetically important groups such as the species-rich Ranunculus genus, where high-quality genome assemblies have historically been limited by computational constraints [60]. By democratizing access to sophisticated bioinformatics tools and high-performance computing, cloud-based workflows are accelerating the pace of discovery in plant functional genomics.

Cloud Genomics Platforms: Comparative Analysis

The landscape of cloud platforms for genomic analysis has diversified significantly, offering solutions tailored to different research needs and technical expertise levels. These platforms can be broadly categorized into data commons, which co-locate data with cloud computing infrastructure and analytical tools, and data ecosystems built by interoperating multiple commons [62]. Below we compare several prominent platforms used in plant genomics research.

Table 1: Comparison of Cloud-Based Genomic Analysis Platforms

Platform	Primary Use Case	Key Features	Interface Options	Workflow Management	Plant Genomics Applications
Closha 2.0	Massive genomic data analysis	Drag-and-drop workflow design, script editor (Python/R), containerized tools, reentrancy function	GUI, scripting	Integrated workflow manager with Podman	Non-model plant genome assembly, transcriptomics [63]
Galaxy	Accessible genomic analysis	Web-based, extensive tool library, shared workflows, visualization tools	Web GUI, limited scripting	Built-in workflow management	Multi-omics integration, sequence analysis [62] [64] [63]
BioContainers	Reproducible analysis across environments	Docker/Singularity containers for bioinformatics tools, standardized environments	Command-line, integrated in platforms	Compatible with Nextflow/Snakemake	Portable genomic workflows, tool distribution [62]
DNAnexus	Commercial genomic analysis	Secure, compliant environment, automated pipelines, collaboration features	Web GUI, API	Nextflow, WDL compatible	Large-scale population genomics, variant calling [62]

The selection of an appropriate platform depends on multiple factors including project scale, technical expertise, and specific analytical requirements. For research groups working with non-model plants, platforms like Closha 2.0 offer particular advantages through their user-friendly interfaces that lower the barrier to complex analyses while maintaining computational robustness [63]. The containerized approach used by several platforms ensures analytical reproducibility and mitigates dependency conflicts that frequently challenge genomic workflows.

Specialized resources continue to emerge to address specific needs in plant genomics. EasyGeSe, for instance, provides a curated collection of datasets for benchmarking genomic prediction methods across multiple species including barley, maize, rice, and soybean, enabling more standardized evaluation of analytical approaches [65]. Such resources are particularly valuable for plant researchers developing predictive models for traits of agricultural importance.

Experimental Data: Benchmarking Cloud Platforms for Plant Gene Discovery

To evaluate the performance of cloud-based workflows in actual plant genomics research, we examined the NEEDLE pipeline as a case study for gene discovery in non-model plants [7]. This network-enabled pipeline systematically identifies transcription factors upstream of genes of interest by leveraging transcriptomic dynamics, addressing a critical bottleneck in non-model species with limited multi-omics resources.

Experimental Protocol: NEEDLE Pipeline Implementation

• Data Acquisition and Preprocessing: Collect dynamic transcriptome datasets from non-model plant species under study. For the validation study, maize unfolded protein response and soybean seed development datasets were utilized [7].

• Coexpression Network Construction: Generate coexpression gene network modules from transcriptomic data using correlation-based approaches implemented in the cloud environment.

• Network Analysis: Measure gene connectivity and establish network hierarchy to identify key transcriptional regulators through topology-based algorithms.

• Experimental Validation: Conduct rapid in planta validation using systems such as virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) to confirm predictions, essential for establishing functional relationships [7] [6].

The NEEDLE pipeline demonstrated its effectiveness by identifying transcription factors regulating cellulose synthase-like F6 (CSLF6) genes in Brachypodium and sorghum, while also illuminating the evolutionary conservation or divergence of gene regulatory elements among grass species [7]. This case highlights how cloud-based workflows can extract biologically meaningful insights from transcriptomic data of non-model plants.

Workflow Performance Metrics

Cloud platforms significantly reduce computational barriers for complex analyses. The Closha 2.0 platform, for instance, provides a framework that enables researchers with limited Linux experience to perform biological data analysis through simple drag-and-drop actions while maintaining the flexibility for advanced users to incorporate custom scripts in Python, R, or Bash [63]. This balance of accessibility and flexibility is particularly valuable for plant biology research groups that may include members with diverse computational backgrounds.

Table 2: Workflow Platform Technical Capabilities Comparison

Platform Feature	Closha 2.0	Galaxy	Traditional HPC
User Interface	Graphical workflow canvas with script editor	Web-based drag-and-drop	Command-line primarily
Container Support	Podman-based container orchestration	Limited container support	Environment modules
Data Transfer	GBox for high-speed transfer	Standard upload/download	SCP/RSYNC
Reentrancy	Resume from last successful step	Restart entire workflow	Manual checkpointing
Learning Curve	Moderate	Low	High

The reentrancy function exemplified by Closha 2.0 is particularly valuable for plant genomics workflows, which often involve lengthy sequential analyses. This capability allows researchers to resume pipelines from the last successfully executed step following interruptions, avoiding costly recomputation and significantly accelerating iterative analytical development [63].

Workflow Architecture: From Data to Biological Insight

The following diagram illustrates a generalized cloud-based genomic workflow for gene discovery and validation in non-model plants, integrating elements from the NEEDLE pipeline [7] with functional validation approaches [6]:

Cloud-Based Gene Discovery Workflow: This diagram outlines the sequential steps for identifying and validating gene function in non-model plants using cloud platforms, from raw data processing to biological insight.

The workflow illustrates how cloud platforms serve as the computational engine for transforming raw sequencing data into candidate genes, which then undergo experimental validation. This integration of computational prediction with experimental validation represents a powerful paradigm for gene function analysis in non-model plants where traditional genetic approaches are often impractical [7] [6].

Essential Research Reagents and Computational Tools

Successful implementation of cloud-based genomic workflows for non-model plant research requires both computational resources and biological reagents. The following table details key solutions utilized in this field:

Table 3: Essential Research Reagent Solutions for Plant Gene Validation

Resource Category	Specific Examples	Application in Non-Model Plant Research
Sequencing Technologies	Illumina NovaSeq X, Oxford Nanopore, PacBio HiFi	Genome assembly, transcriptome sequencing [61] [60]
Gene Silencing Systems	CymMV-based VIGS vectors	Rapid functional validation in non-model plants [6]
Genome Assembly Tools	Hi-C scaffolding, BUSCO	Chromosome-scale assemblies, quality assessment [60]
Data Resources	EasyGeSe datasets	Benchmarking genomic prediction methods [65]
Analysis Platforms	Closha 2.0, Galaxy, Bioconductor	Cloud-based workflow management [64] [63]

The integration of long-read sequencing technologies (Oxford Nanopore, PacBio HiFi) has been particularly transformative for non-model plant genomics, enabling chromosome-scale assemblies that overcome challenges posed by large, repetitive genomes [60]. For functional validation, virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) systems based on plant viruses such as Cymbidium mosaic virus (CymMV) provide efficient alternatives to stable transformation, enabling gene function studies even in species with long life cycles [6].

Cloud platforms increasingly support the entire analytical continuum from raw data processing to biological interpretation. The script editor functionality in Closha 2.0, supporting Python, R, and Bash, exemplifies how these platforms accommodate both standardized analyses and custom algorithmic development, meeting the diverse analytical demands of modern plant genomics research [63].

Cloud-based workflow management has emerged as a cornerstone technology for advancing functional genomics in non-model plants. By providing scalable computational resources, user-friendly interfaces, and reproducible analytical environments, platforms like Closha 2.0, Galaxy, and specialized data commons are democratizing access to sophisticated genomic analyses [62] [63]. These technologies are particularly valuable for research communities studying phylogenetically important but computationally challenging plant groups characterized by large genomes, polyploidy, and complex evolutionary histories [60].

The integration of cloud computing with experimental validation frameworks such as VIGS creates a powerful synergy that accelerates the pace of gene function discovery [7] [6]. As these technologies continue to evolve, they promise to further lower barriers to genomic research, enabling plant biologists to focus more on biological questions and less on computational challenges. For the field of non-model plant genomics, this represents a paradigm shift toward more accessible, reproducible, and collaborative science that can fully leverage the rich biological diversity of the plant kingdom.

Robust Frameworks for Confirming Gene Function and Assessing Method Efficacy

Establishing a Multi-Tiered Validation Hierarchy from Computational to Experimental Evidence

In plant genomics, particularly for non-model organisms, establishing a robust validation hierarchy is paramount for translating genetic data into functional understanding. This systematic approach bridges the gap between computational predictions and experimental confirmation, ensuring research reproducibility and biological relevance. For researchers and drug development professionals working with non-model plants, this multi-tiered framework provides a structured pathway from gene discovery to functional characterization, addressing the unique challenges posed by less-studied species with limited existing annotation.

The validation hierarchy progresses through sequential stages, beginning with computational predictions that guide targeted experimental designs, moving through transient and stable transformation assays, and culminating in multi-omics integration and phenotype characterization. This systematic approach efficiently allocates resources while building compelling evidence for gene function claims, enabling researchers to navigate the complexities of plant genomes with confidence.

Computational Prediction & Prioritization Tier

The foundation of gene function validation begins with computational methods that prioritize candidates for further experimental investigation. This initial tier leverages bioinformatics tools and machine learning approaches to filter potential genes from genomic data.

Machine learning algorithms have revolutionized gene function prediction by integrating heterogeneous data types and identifying patterns inconspicuous to rule-based approaches. Supervised methods including random forests, support vector machines (SVM), and k-nearest neighbors are frequently deployed for classification tasks, while convolutional and recurrent neural networks excel at feature extraction from complex genomic data [66]. These approaches predict diverse functional attributes from sequence features alone, significantly narrowing the candidate pool for wet-lab validation.

Advanced computational frameworks now incorporate deep learning models like AlphaFold2 for predicting protein structures of novel genes, revealing that some de novo proteins can achieve well-folded conformations despite lacking conserved domains [59]. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) demonstrates how putative genes integrate into existing regulatory networks, providing secondary validation of their potential functional relevance [59].

Table 1: Computational Prediction Methods for Gene Function Validation

Method	Typical Algorithms	Application Scope	Key Features Analyzed
Protein-coding gene identification	HMM, SVM	Genome annotation	Genomic sequences, mapped RNA-seq transcripts, orthologous sequences [66]
Subcellular localization	RNNs, ensemble clustering using kNN	Protein function prediction	Localization sequences, GO terms, domain composition [66]
Protein-protein interactions	SVM, RF	Pathway analysis	Subcellular localization, expression patterns, protein domains [66]
Gene Ontology prediction	CNN, decision trees, kNN	Functional categorization	Gene expression, predicted secondary structure, homology [66]
Structure prediction	AlphaFold2	Protein characterization	Amino acid sequences, evolutionary constraints [59]

Experimental Validation Tier

Genome Editing Approaches

The experimental validation tier begins with genome editing technologies that enable direct manipulation of target genes. CRISPR-based systems provide powerful tools for functional validation through targeted mutagenesis.

Recent advances in artificial intelligence-designed editors demonstrate the potential for highly specific genome manipulation. AI-generated editors like OpenCRISPR-1 exhibit comparable or improved activity and specificity relative to SpCas9 while being 400 mutations away in sequence from natural variants [67]. These synthetic systems expand the toolbox available for plant researchers.

For non-model plants with incomplete genetic transformation systems, tissue culture-free methods have emerged as valuable alternatives [10]:

• Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated root transformation enables rapid functional screening in hairy roots
• Developmental regulators-mediated transformation enhances shoot formation without tissue culture
• Virus-mediated genome editing delivers editing components through viral vectors

Table 2: Genome Editing Platforms for Functional Validation

Editing Technology	Mechanism	Advantages	Limitations
CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases	DNA double-strand breaks	High efficiency, versatility	Off-target effects, complex repair outcomes [68] [10]
Base editing (BEs)	Chemical conversion of bases	Precise point mutations, no DSBs	Limited editing window, off-target RNA editing [68] [10]
Prime editing (PE)	Reverse transcription of edited sequence	Broad editing types, reduced off-targets	Variable efficiency across sites [68] [10]
AI-designed editors	Programmable nucleases	Novel PAM specificities, optimized properties	Limited characterization in plants [67]

Transient Transformation Assays

Transient expression systems provide a rapid intermediate validation step before stable transformation. These methods enable rapid assessment of gene function, subcellular localization, and regulatory effects without genomic integration.

Agrobacterium-mediated transient transformation through agroinfiltration has proven particularly valuable for diverse plant species [69]. The AGROBEST system optimized for Arabidopsis seedlings represents an efficient platform for versatile gene function analyses [69]. Similarly, PEG-mediated transfection of protoplasts offers a species-independent approach for transient gene expression, successfully applied in maize, poplar, and other species [69].

Transient systems are especially valuable for studying subcellular protein localization, protein-protein interactions, and promoter activity [69]. For non-model plants where stable transformation is challenging, these approaches provide critical functional data to prioritize genes for more resource-intensive stable transformation.

Multi-Omics Integration & Systems Validation Tier

The integration of multiple data types through multi-omics approaches provides systems-level validation of gene function, capturing complex biological interactions across molecular layers.

Integration methodologies include early data-level fusion, intermediate feature-level fusion, and late decision-level fusion [70]. Intermediate integration strategies balance comprehensive information retention with computational efficiency, making them particularly suitable for plant functional genomics studies [70].

Successful applications in plants demonstrate the power of multi-omics integration. Studies combining transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics have revealed interconnected molecular changes in response to genetic perturbations, providing robust validation of gene function through coordinated changes across biological layers [71]. These approaches are particularly valuable for characterizing metabolic pathway enzymes and regulatory genes with subtle phenotypic effects.

Machine learning algorithms excel at analyzing high-dimensional multi-omics datasets. Random forests and gradient boosting methods handle mixed data types and non-linear relationships, while deep learning architectures automatically learn complex patterns across omics layers [70]. Network-based integration approaches leverage known biological relationships to guide multi-omics analysis, often achieving superior performance compared to methods ignoring molecular interaction information [70].

Multi-Omics Integration Workflow for Systems Validation

Hierarchical Workflow & Decision Framework

A structured hierarchical workflow guides researchers through the validation process, optimizing resource allocation while building compelling evidence for gene function.

Hierarchical Validation Workflow for Plant Gene Function

Research Reagent Solutions for Non-Model Plants

Working with non-model organisms requires specialized reagents and tools adapted to species-specific challenges. The following solutions enable functional validation despite limited genetic resources.

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents for Plant Gene Function Validation

Reagent Category	Specific Examples	Function in Validation	Application Notes
Genome editing systems	CRISPR-Cas9, Base editors, Prime editors	Targeted gene modification	AI-designed editors (e.g., OpenCRISPR-1) show enhanced properties [67] [68]
Transformation vectors	pCambia series, Gateway-compatible vectors	DNA delivery and integration	Species-specific optimization required [10]
Agrobacterium strains	GV3101, K599, EHA105	Plant transformation	K599 for hairy root transformation [10]
Developmental regulators	BABY BOOM, WUSCHEL	Enhance regeneration	Bypass tissue culture limitations [10]
Viral delivery systems	TRV, CLBV, Bean Yellow Dwarf Virus	Transient expression, genome editing	Virus-mediated editing in Cas9-transgenic plants [10]
Protoplast isolation systems	Cellulase, Macerozyme mixtures	Transient expression in single cells	PEG-mediated transformation [69]
Multi-omics platforms	RNA-seq, Proteomics, Metabolomics kits	Systems-level validation	Integrated analysis reveals cross-layer interactions [71] [70]

Establishing a multi-tiered validation hierarchy from computational to experimental evidence provides a robust framework for plant gene function analysis, particularly crucial for non-model organisms where traditional genetic tools are limited. This systematic approach progresses through computational prediction, genome editing, transient assays, stable transformation, and multi-omics integration, with each tier providing complementary evidence for gene function.

For researchers in both academic and industrial settings, this hierarchy offers a strategic pathway for prioritizing resources while building compelling evidence chains. The integration of machine learning and AI-designed tools with experimental validation creates a powerful feedback loop that accelerates functional discovery. As these technologies continue to advance, they promise to further democratize functional genomics across the plant kingdom, enabling deeper understanding of plant biology and enhanced crop improvement strategies.

In the field of plant genomics, accurately predicting gene function in non-model organisms is a fundamental challenge. Without the curated reference genomes available for model species, researchers heavily rely on computational tools for gene annotation and functional prediction. The selection of an appropriate tool can dramatically impact the validity and success of downstream experiments. This guide provides an objective comparison of leading benchmarking tools and techniques, evaluating their prediction accuracy, computational efficiency, and applicability within a research workflow focused on validating plant gene function in non-model organisms. By synthesizing quantitative performance data and detailing experimental methodologies, this analysis aims to empower researchers in selecting the most effective tools for their specific needs.

Comparative Performance of Prediction Tools

The accuracy and efficiency of computational tools are paramount for research progress. The table below summarizes the performance of key tools as reported in benchmarking studies.

Table 1: Benchmarking Performance of Genomic and Functional Prediction Tools

Tool Name	Primary Function	Reported Accuracy (Correlation/Pearson's r)	Computational Efficiency	Key Strengths
EasyGeSe Models (XGBoost) [65]	Genomic Prediction	0.62 (mean across species, range: -0.08 to 0.96) [65]	Model fitting times an order of magnitude faster than Bayesian methods [65]	High accuracy for complex traits; handles diverse biological data [65]
Seq2Fun [72]	Functional Profiling (RNA-seq)	R²: 0.85–1.00 (Simulated data) [72]	>120x faster than conventional de novo assembly workflows [72]	Ultrafast analysis; operates on a personal computer [72]
Hayai-Annotation [73]	Functional Gene Prediction	Exceeded benchmark (InterProScan) in GO annotation accuracy [73]	Information Not Available	High Gene Ontology annotation accuracy; specialized for plants [73]
FunctionAnnotator [18]	Functional Gene Prediction	Annotated 35,971 of 56,263 contigs in a clam transcriptome [18]	7.5 hours for a 38 Mb transcriptome; parallel computing [18]	Comprehensive annotations; user-friendly web interface [18]
NEEDLE [74]	Gene Discovery & TF Prediction	Validated predictions in maize UPR and soybean seed development [74]	Requires a minimum of six dynamic transcriptome samples [74]	Integrates network prediction with rapid in planta validation [74]

The data reveals a trade-off between specialization and generality. Tools like Seq2Fun excel in raw speed for functional profiling, while XGBoost (via EasyGeSe) demonstrates robust predictive power across diverse genomic prediction tasks. For plant-specific research, Hayai-Annotation and NEEDLE offer specialized capabilities, with the latter providing a complete pipeline from prediction to experimental validation.

Experimental Protocols for Benchmarking

To ensure fair and reproducible comparisons, standardized experimental protocols are essential. The following methodologies are commonly employed in benchmarking studies.

Protocol 1: Benchmarking Genomic Prediction Models

This protocol, based on the EasyGeSe resource, is designed for evaluating tools that predict phenotypic traits from genotypic data [65].

• Data Acquisition and Curation: Obtain a curated dataset from a resource like EasyGeSe, which includes genotypic (e.g., SNP data) and phenotypic data from multiple species (e.g., barley, maize, rice) [65].
• Data Preprocessing: Filter genotypic data for quality control, removing markers with high missing data rates or low minor allele frequency (e.g., MAF < 5%). Impute any remaining missing genotypes using algorithms like Beagle [65].
• Model Training and Testing: Partition the data into training and testing sets using cross-validation techniques (e.g., k-fold cross-validation). Train multiple models, including:
  • Parametric: GBLUP, Bayesian methods (BayesA, BayesB, BL) [65].
  • Semi-Parametric: Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces (RKHS) [65].
  • Non-Parametric: Random Forest, XGBoost, LightGBM [65].
• Performance Evaluation: Calculate the predictive accuracy on the test set using Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) between the predicted and observed phenotypic values. Compare model performance based on this metric, computational time, and memory usage [65].

Protocol 2: Evaluating Functional Annotation Tools

This protocol assesses tools that assign biological functions to gene sequences from non-model organisms, derived from studies on tools like Seq2Fun and FunctionAnnotator [18] [72].

• Input Data Preparation: Use assembled transcriptome contigs or raw RNA-seq reads from a non-model plant organism. For tools requiring assembled sequences, ensure contigs are filtered by length (e.g., >66 amino acids for FunctionAnnotator) [18].
• Tool Execution and Annotation:
  • Run the target annotation tool (e.g., FunctionAnnotator, Seq2Fun) with default parameters.
  • For web-based tools like FunctionAnnotator, upload data and select relevant taxonomic groups (e.g., plants) [18].
  • For command-line tools like Seq2Fun, run the software in the appropriate mode (e.g., "Greedy" mode for organisms without close references) [72].
• Output Analysis and Validation:
  • Collect outputs including Gene Ontology (GO) term assignments, enzyme codes (EC), and pathway mappings (e.g., KEGG) [18] [72].
  • Assess accuracy by measuring the recall (proportion of true positives identified) and precision using simulated data where the "true" functions are known [72].
  • For real data, validate a subset of annotations through manual curation or orthogonal experimental methods.

Workflow Visualization: Functional Annotation Benchmarking

The following diagram illustrates the core workflow for benchmarking functional annotation tools, integrating steps from the protocols above.

Successful gene function validation relies on a combination of computational tools and data resources. The table below details key solutions used in the featured experiments and the broader field.

Table 2: Key Research Reagent Solutions for Plant Gene Validation

Resource Name	Type	Function in Research
EasyGeSe [65]	Curated Dataset	Provides standardized genomic and phenotypic datasets from multiple species for benchmarking prediction methods.
UniProtKB Plants [73]	Protein Database	A curated protein database used as a reference for functional annotation and ortholog inference in plants.
KEGG Ortholog (KO) Database [72]	Pathway Database	Used for mapping annotated genes to biological pathways, enabling functional and pathway enrichment analysis.
OrthoDB [73]	Ortholog Database	Provides information on orthologous genes across species, crucial for inferring gene function in non-model organisms.
Transient Reporter Assay System [74]	Validation Platform	An in planta system for rapid experimental validation of predicted transcription factor-target gene interactions.

The benchmarking data and protocols presented herein provide a framework for critically evaluating prediction tools in plant genomics. No single tool is universally superior; the choice depends on the specific research question, whether it is genomic prediction of traits, functional annotation of transcripts, or discovery of gene regulators. The integration of high-accuracy computational tools like XGBoost for genomic prediction or Seq2Fun for rapid annotation, followed by experimental validation using systems like the transient reporter assay, represents a powerful strategy for accelerating gene function validation in non-model plants. As the field evolves with trends toward real-time data and ethical AI, the reliance on robust, standardized benchmarking will only grow in importance, ensuring that predictions are not only accurate but also biologically meaningful.

The Role of Independent Datasets and Saturation Genome Editing in Rigorous Validation

In the field of non-model plant research, validating gene function presents unique challenges, including complex genomes, limited annotated databases, and the absence of established functional protocols. Saturation genome editing (SGE) has emerged as a powerful solution, enabling comprehensive functional characterization of genetic variants. This CRISPR-Cas9-based technology allows researchers to systematically test nearly all possible single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) within a target gene region in a single, multiplexed experiment [75] [76]. The resulting functional maps provide high-resolution data that can resolve variants of uncertain significance (VUS) into clinically actionable classifications, with recent studies demonstrating perfect accuracy in identifying pathogenic alleles driving clear cell renal cell carcinoma [76]. For plant scientists working with non-model organisms, SGE offers a paradigm shift from gene-by-gene analysis to systematic functional characterization, potentially overcoming the annotation limitations that traditionally hinder research on species without established genomic resources.

SGE Methodologies and Workflows

Core Experimental Protocol

The SGE workflow integrates CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing with high-throughput sequencing to quantify variant effects on cellular fitness. The standardized protocol involves:

• Library Design and Construction: Seven SGE libraries tiling the coding sequence of the target gene are designed, including exon-proximal intronic regions and untranslated regions. Each library consists of all possible SNVs cloned into vectors with homology arms for precise genomic integration [76].
• Cell Line Selection and Transfection: The haploid human cell line HAP1 is commonly used due to its single-allele expression, which prevents masking of variant effects. Libraries are transfected using optimized protocols featuring improved efficiency and the addition of 10-deacetyl-baccatin-III (DAB) to maintain haploidy [76].
• Time-Course Experiment and Sequencing: Cells are harvested at multiple timepoints (e.g., day 6 and day 20 post-transfection). Genomic DNA is extracted and subjected to amplicon sequencing to quantify variant abundance changes over time [76].
• Functional Scoring: A "function score" is calculated for each SNV based on its depletion or enrichment during the experiment, reflecting the variant's impact on cellular fitness. Significantly depleted SNVs are identified using statistical thresholds (e.g., false discovery rate of 0.01) [76].
• mRNA Analysis: Targeted RNA-sequencing generates "RNA scores" to distinguish variants affecting transcription or splicing from those impacting protein function [76].

Workflow Visualization

The following diagram illustrates the core SGE workflow:

Comparative Performance Analysis of SGE Technologies

Key Performance Metrics Across Gene Targets

SGE has been applied to multiple disease-associated genes, demonstrating consistent high performance across diverse genomic contexts. The table below summarizes quantitative results from major SGE studies:

Table 1: Performance Metrics of Saturation Genome Editing Applications

Gene Target	Variants Scored	Coverage of Possible SNVs	Pathogenic Variants Identified	Benign Variants Identified	Clinical Accuracy	Key Findings
BRCA2 [75]	6,551 SNVs	96.4% (exons 15-26)	776 SNVs	3,384 SNVs	Aligns closely with ClinVar and predictors	Resolved 77.2% of missense VUS as benign, 20.4% as pathogenic
VHL [76]	2,268 SNVs	85.4% of coding regions	Core pathogenic set for ccRCC	Neutral variants across regions	100% accuracy for ccRCC drivers	Revealed mRNA dosage effects and mechanism-specific impacts
BRCA1 [77]	4,113 previously unassayed SNVs	Significant portion of coding regions	538 function-impacting variants	Cell-type dependent neutral variants	Near-perfect discrimination in HAP1 cells	Identified context-specific hypomorphic variants with intermediate risk

Comparison with Alternative Functional Validation Methods

SGE provides distinct advantages over traditional functional validation approaches, particularly for non-model organisms where genetic and clinical data are limited.

Table 2: Method Comparison for Gene Function Validation in Non-Model Systems

Method	Throughput	Resolution	Clinical Concordance	Implementation Barriers	Best Use Cases
Saturation Genome Editing	Very High (1,000-10,000 variants/assay)	Single-nucleotide	94-100% for classified variants [75] [76]	Specialized cell lines, complex workflow	Comprehensive variant interpretation, VUS resolution
Ortholog-Based Prediction (NoAC) [78]	High (entome genomes)	Gene-level with functional annotation transfer	Limited to model organism knowledge	Depends on reference organism quality	Initial gene annotation in non-model species
Network-Enabled Discovery (NEEDLE) [7]	Moderate (co-expression networks)	Pathway and regulator identification	Not directly applicable	Requires transcriptomic datasets	Identifying upstream regulators of key genes
Traditional Single-Variant Assays	Very Low (1-10 variants/study)	Single-nucleotide	High for characterized variants	Labor-intensive, not scalable	Final validation of individual candidates

Specialized Applications in Non-Model Organism Research

Bridging the Annotation Gap with Computational Tools

Non-model plant research benefits from integrated approaches that combine SGE principles with specialized bioinformatics tools. The Non-model Organism Atlas Constructor (NoAC) automatically constructs knowledge bases and query interfaces for non-model organism genomes without programming skills [78]. By uploading gene or transcript information and selecting an appropriate reference model organism, researchers can identify orthologous genes and infer functional annotations including gene ontology terms, protein domains, and pathways. In a case study on Phalaenopsis equestris, NoAC associated functional annotations for more than half of its 21,938 genes, supporting the study of novel genes involved in flower development [78].

Similarly, the NEEDLE pipeline identifies transcription factors upstream of genes of interest by leveraging transcriptomic dynamics in non-model plants, enabling the discovery of evolutionarily conserved or divergent regulatory elements [7]. When applied to identify regulators of cellulose synthase-like F6 (CSLF6) in Brachypodium and sorghum, NEEDLE uncovered key transcriptional controllers of this important cell wall biosynthetic gene [7].

Integrated Workflow for Non-Model Plant Gene Validation

The following diagram illustrates how SGE principles integrate with specialized tools for non-model plant research:

Research Reagent Solutions for Functional Genomics

Implementing comprehensive functional validation requires specialized reagents and platforms. The table below details essential research solutions:

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents and Platforms for Functional Genomics

Reagent/Platform	Function	Key Features	Application Examples
SGE Library Systems [76]	Multiplex variant assessment	CRISPR-Cas9 based, covers >85% of possible SNVs	BRCA1/2, VHL variant classification
NoAC Platform [78]	Automated knowledge base construction	Ortholog mapping, functional annotation transfer	Gene annotation in Phalaenopsis equestris
NEEDLE Pipeline [7]	Transcription factor discovery	Co-expression network analysis	CSLF6 regulator identification in grasses
MaveDB Database [79]	Variant effect data repository	Over 7 million variant effects, standardized access	Dataset exploration, clinical interpretation
AI-Guided Cas9 Engineering [80]	Enhanced editing efficiency	ProMEP prediction, 2-3x efficiency improvement	Base editor optimization for challenging loci

The dramatic expansion of functional genomic data necessitates robust repositories for data sharing and integration. MaveDB serves as the central community database for multiplexed assays of variant effect (MAVEs), containing over 7 million variant effect measurements across 1,884 datasets as of November 2024 [79]. The database has implemented significant improvements including support for saturation genome editing data types, enhanced visualization tools, and powerful APIs for data federation. For plant researchers working with non-model species, MaveDB provides access to variant effect maps that can inform functional predictions even for distantly related species, especially when combined with ortholog detection tools like NoAC [78] [79].

The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology guidelines provide a framework for integrating SGE data with other available evidence for clinical classification of SNVs [75]. This standardized approach ensures that functional data from systematic assays can be consistently applied to variant interpretation, a principle that translates effectively to plant systems where clinical severity analogs include agronomically important traits like yield, stress tolerance, and nutritional content.

Saturation genome editing represents a transformative approach for rigorous validation of gene function, particularly valuable for non-model organism research where traditional genetic evidence is limited. By providing comprehensive functional maps of genetic variants, SGE enables plant biologists to move beyond correlation-based predictions to causal understanding of gene function. The integration of SGE principles with specialized bioinformatics tools like NoAC and NEEDLE creates a powerful framework for accelerating gene discovery and functional characterization in non-model plants. As these technologies continue to evolve and become more accessible, they promise to democratize functional genomics research across diverse species, supporting crop improvement, conservation efforts, and fundamental plant biology research.

In cereal crops and grasses, the Cellulose Synthase-Like F6 (CSLF6) gene encodes the major synthase for mixed-linkage glucan (MLG), a soluble dietary fiber with significant importance for human nutrition and potential for biofuel production [81] [82]. Despite the agronomic importance of MLG, the transcriptional regulators controlling CSLF6 expression have remained largely unknown. Identifying such regulators is a common challenge in non-model plant species, where extensive multi-omics resources are often scarce [24] [74]. This case study examines a systematic approach that leveraged a novel computational pipeline, NEEDLE, to discover and validate transcription factors (TFs) regulating CSLF6 in two non-model grass species: Brachypodium distachyon and Sorghum bicolor [83] [84]. The research provides a blueprint for gene discovery and functional validation that bypasses the need for extensive genomic resources.

Experimental Pipeline: The NEEDLE Workflow

The "Network-Enabled Gene Discovery Pipeline" (NEEDLE) was designed to identify key transcriptional regulators from dynamic transcriptome datasets in non-model species [74] [25]. Its application to CSLF6 regulation involved a structured, multi-phase process.

NEEDLE Experimental Protocol

The NEEDLE pipeline consists of a prediction phase and a validation phase [74]. The following protocol outlines the key steps applied to the CSLF6 study:

• Step 1: Transcriptome Data Processing. Initiate the pipeline with RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) data derived from multiple samples (a minimum of six is recommended for sufficient dynamics). Process the raw data using a standard RNA-seq analysis pipeline to generate a normalized gene expression matrix. The input should be restricted to "not lowly expressed genes" (e.g., differentially expressed genes or genes with FPKM >10 in at least one sample) to minimize background noise [74].
• Step 2: Coexpression Network Analysis. Feed the gene expression matrix into a weighted correlation network analysis (WGCNA) algorithm. This unsupervised analysis groups genes with statistically similar expression patterns into distinct coexpression modules [74].
• Step 3: Functional Annotation & Module Selection. Annotate the resulting coexpression modules functionally. Identify and select the specific module(s) that contain the gene of interest, in this case, CSLF6, for further analysis [74].
• Step 4: Gene Regulatory Network (GRN) Inference. Within the selected coexpression module(s), use tree-based ensemble techniques (e.g., random forest) to infer a hierarchical GRN. This step produces a ranked list of predicted regulatory relationships between transcription factors (TFs) and their target genes, including CSLF6 [74].
• Step 5: Cis-Regulatory Element (CRE) Analysis. Extract the promoter sequences of the genes within the module of interest. Analyze these sequences to identify conserved or significantly enriched CREs, which can provide supporting evidence for the predicted TF-target relationships [74].
• Step 6: In Planta Validation. Select the top-ranked TFs predicted to regulate CSLF6 for experimental validation. A transient reporter system (e.g., in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves) is used to confirm the transcriptional activity of the TF on the CSLF6 promoter in vivo [74] [84]. This typically involves co-expressing the TF with a reporter gene (e.g., GUS or LUC) driven by the CSLF6 promoter and measuring reporter activity.

Workflow Diagram

The following diagram illustrates the integrated prediction and validation workflow of the NEEDLE pipeline:

Key Findings and Comparative Data

Application of the NEEDLE pipeline to Brachypodium and sorghum transcriptome data successfully identified novel transcription factors regulating CSLF6.

Table 1: Transcription Factors Regulating CSLF6 in Brachypodium and Sorghum

Species	Identified Transcription Factors	Evolutionary Insight	Key Experimental Evidence
Brachypodium distachyon	Novel TFs identified via NEEDLE ranking [83] [84]	Revealed functional divergence and conservation of regulatory elements between grass species [74]	In vivo validation of TF binding and activity on the BdCSLF6 promoter [84]
Sorghum bicolor	Novel TFs identified via NEEDLE ranking [83] [84]	Revealed functional divergence and conservation of regulatory elements between grass species [74]	In vivo validation of TF binding and activity on the SbCSLF6 promoter [84]

The cross-species prediction and validation not only uncovered specific regulators but also provided insights into the evolutionary conservation and divergence of the gene regulatory network controlling a key cell wall biosynthetic gene across different grass lineages [74] [83].

Regulatory Network Diagram

The following diagram summarizes the regulatory relationship uncovered by the case study, leading to the synthesis of Mixed-Linkage Glucan (MLG):

The Scientist's Toolkit: Key Research Reagents

The experimental validation of CSLF6 regulators relied on several critical reagents and platforms, which are essential for reproducing this research.

Table 2: Essential Research Reagents and Resources for NEEDLE Pipeline and Validation

Reagent / Resource	Function / Description	Role in CSLF6 Case Study
NEEDLE Pipeline	A user-friendly computational tool that integrates coexpression network analysis and GRN inference from transcriptomic data [24] [74].	Core platform for predicting upstream transcription factors of CSLF6 in both Brachypodium and sorghum.
Dynamic RNA-seq Dataset	A transcriptome profiling dataset with a minimum of six samples providing sufficient expression dynamics for robust network analysis [74].	Primary input data for the NEEDLE pipeline to generate coexpression modules.
Nicotiana benthamiana	A model plant species widely used for transient expression assays due to its high transformation efficiency and rapid biomass production [41].	Host for in vivo validation of TF binding and activity on the CSLF6 promoter.
Transient Reporter System	A combination of a reporter gene (e.g., GUS, LUC) driven by a target promoter and an effector gene (e.g., a candidate TF) [74].	Method for experimentally confirming the regulatory function of TFs predicted by NEEDLE to control CSLF6.
Agrobacterium tumefaciens	A soil bacterium commonly used as a vector for delivering foreign DNA into plant cells [41].	Vehicle for delivering reporter and effector constructs into N. benthamiana leaves during transient assays.

This case study demonstrates that the NEEDLE pipeline provides an effective and streamlined framework for discovering and validating gene regulators in non-model plant species [25]. By applying it to Brachypodium distachyon and Sorghum bicolor, researchers successfully identified transcription factors controlling the expression of CSLF6, a gene of central importance to cell wall biology and nutritional quality [83] [84]. The approach required only transcriptomic data as a starting point, making it a powerful and accessible strategy for functional genomics in species with limited multi-omics resources. The insights gained into the regulation of MLG synthesis have significant implications for future efforts to bioengineer crops with improved dietary fiber content or optimized biomass for biofuel production [81] [25].

Conclusion

The validation of gene function in non-model plants is being transformed by an integrated toolkit of network biology, advanced sequencing, precise genome editing, and sophisticated computational models. Success hinges on a synergistic approach that combines exploratory bioinformatics with robust experimental pipelines, followed by rigorous, multi-layered validation. For biomedical and clinical research, these advancements are not just academic; they pave the way for engineering non-model plants into sustainable bio-factories for therapeutic compounds and for rapidly developing climate-resilient crops. The future lies in the deeper integration of AI-driven predictions with high-throughput experimental screens, the continued refinement of genotype-independent transformation methods, and the establishment of standardized validation frameworks. This will ultimately close the gap between gene discovery in any plant species and its practical application in addressing global health and agricultural challenges.

References

• 1. Plant science's next top models - PMC - PubMed Central [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7304477/]
• 2. Non-model model organisms - PMC - PubMed Central [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5492503/]
• 3. Non-model Plants: Challenges and Solutions [https://botany.org/home/publications/apps/non-model-plants-challenges-and-solutions.html]
• 4. Should You Use a Non-Model Organism in Your Research? [https://bitesizebio.com/48039/your-checklist-to-working-with-an-emerging-model-organism/]
• 5. Plant genetic and genomic resources for sustained crop ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10450027/]
• 6. Strategies for Functional Validation of Genes Involved in ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1803755/]
• 7. Article A network-enabled pipeline for gene discovery and ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667237524003539]
• 8. How Plant Genomics Works — In One Simple Flow (2025) [https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/how-plant-genomics-works-one-simple-flow-2025-optima-click-research-d8mue]
• 9. Non-model organism research in the changing genomic ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8081395/]
• 10. Review and Validation of Plant Gene Function Research ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/15/3/603]
• 11. Chimeric mis-annotations of genes remain pervasive in ... [https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12864-025-11765-w]
• 12. Evolutionarily conserved hierarchical gene regulatory ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34045707/]
• 13. Conserved and divergent gene regulatory programs of the ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06819-6]
• 14. Evolutionary rewiring of regulatory networks contributes to ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8887464/]
• 15. Comparative genomics provides insights into the ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-57722-9]
• 16. Sc-compReg enables the comparison of gene regulatory ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-25089-2]
• 17. CompNet: a GUI based tool for comparison of multiple ... [https://bmcbioinformatics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12859-016-1013-x]
• 18. FunctionAnnotator, a versatile and efficient web tool for non ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-10952-4]
• 19. Oatk: a de novo assembly tool for complex plant organelle ... [https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13059-025-03676-6]
• 20. NLR-Annotator: A Tool for De Novo ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7271797/]
• 21. GitHub - oushujun/EDTA: Extensive de-novo TE Annotator [https://github.com/oushujun/EDTA]
• 22. De novo annotation reveals transcriptomic complexity ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-64046-1]
• 23. Comparison of functional classification systems - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9713901/]
• 24. A network-enabled pipeline for gene discovery and ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39874949/]
• 25. NEEDLE points to gene regulators: Q&A with Federica Brandizzi [https://prl.natsci.msu.edu/news-and-events/news/2025-02-needle-points-to-gene-regulators-q-and-a-with-federica-brandizzi.aspx]
• 26. Network Visualization - Data Visualization [https://guides.library.jhu.edu/datavisualization/network]
• 27. Research Progress and Future Development Trends in ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8355584/]
• 28. Digital gene expression for non-model organisms - PubMed [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21844123/]
• 29. tag-based digital gene: Topics by Science.gov [https://www.science.gov/topicpages/t/tag-based+digital+gene]
• 30. DeepSAGE--digital transcriptomics with high sensitivity, simple experimental protocol and multiplexing of samples - PubMed [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17028099/]
• 31. Systematic benchmarking of high-throughput subcellular ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12534522/]
• 32. Digital gene expression profiling by 5'-end sequencing of ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22574165/]
• 33. Using CRISPR as a Gene Editing Tool for Validating ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/ecology-and-evolution/articles/10.3389/fevo.2018.00076/full]
• 34. Integrating genome editing with omics, artificial intelligence ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12281252/]
• 35. CRISPR/Cas9 in plant biotechnology: applications and ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9642946/]
• 36. Plant Functional Genomics Based on High‐Throughput ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10919289/]
• 37. CRISPR activation: identifying and using novel genes for ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12450905/]
• 38. Guidelines for Performing CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10610170/]
• 39. High-content CRISPR screening [https://www.nature.com/articles/s43586-021-00093-4]
• 40. Frontiers | Engineering Nicotiana for chrysoeriol... benthamiana [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2024.1458916/full]
• 41. Plant synthetic biology: from knowledge to biomolecules [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1562216/full]
• 42. Researchers develop high-yield plant chassis for green biosynthesis of... [https://newshub.sustech.edu.cn/en/html/202505/46058.html]
• 43. Reconstitution of monoterpene indole alkaloid biosynthesis in genome... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9464250/]
• 44. Synthetic biology in plants - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11921130/]
• 45. Whole Transcriptome vs 3' mRNA-Seq: How to Choose ... [https://www.lexogen.com/blog/choosing-between-whole-transcriptome-total-rna-seq-and-3-mrna-seq/]
• 46. Systematic assessment of long-read RNA-seq methods for ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41592-024-02298-3]
• 47. DEMINERS enables clinical metagenomics and comparative ... [https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13059-025-03536-3]
• 48. Commentary: a review of technical considerations for ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12522984/]
• 49. Building better genome annotations across the tree of life - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12047660/]
• 50. JGI announces 2025 Functional Genomics awardees [https://jgi.doe.gov/user-science/science-stories/jgi-announces-2025-functional-genomics-awardees]
• 51. Preliminary Establishment of an Efficient Regeneration and ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2311-7524/11/4/417]
• 52. An optimized protocol for in vitro regeneration and genetic ... [https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12864-025-11899-x]
• 53. In silico prediction of variant effects: promises and limitations ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12304032/]
• 54. Genome-wide prediction of disease variant effects with a ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41588-023-01465-0]
• 55. Deep learning tools predict variants in disordered regions with ... [https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12864-025-11534-9]
• 56. New AI tool illuminates “dark side” of the human genome [https://www.salk.edu/news-release/new-ai-tool-illuminates-dark-side-of-the-human-genome/]
• 57. Ultra-fast variant effect prediction using biophysical ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12507518/]
• 58. Foundation models in plant molecular biology: advances ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1611992/full]
• 59. Rethinking de novo genes in plants: mechanisms ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1724832/full]
• 60. Assembling genomes of non‐model plants: A case study with ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12448783/]
• 61. 2025 and Beyond: The Future of Genomic Data Analysis ... [https://blog.crownbio.com/2025-and-beyond-the-future-of-genomic-data-analysis-and-innovations-in-genomics-services]
• 62. A Review of Platforms for Analyzing and Sharing Genomic Data [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6474403/]
• 63. Closha 2.0: a bio-workflow design system for massive genome ... [https://bmcbioinformatics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12859-024-05963-8]
• 64. Top 10 AI Genetic Analysis Tools in 2025: Features, Pros ... [https://www.devopsschool.com/blog/top-10-ai-genetic-analysis-tools-in-2025-features-pros-cons-comparison/]
• 65. EasyGeSe – a resource for benchmarking genomic prediction ... [https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12864-025-12129-0]
• 66. Machine learning: A powerful tool for gene prediction in... function [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7394712/]
• 67. Design of highly functional genome editors by modelling ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09298-z]
• 68. Harnessing artificial intelligence to advance CRISPR ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41576-025-00907-1]
• 69. Transient Gene Expression in Plants Is an Efficient Experimental ... [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1021443724607651]
• 70. Multi-Omics Biomarker Integration: A Systems Approach [https://www.motif.bio/blog/multi-omics-biomarker-integration-2025]
• 71. Integrated transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41230144/]
• 72. Ultrafast functional profiling of RNA-seq data for nonmodel ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8015844/]
• 73. Hayai-Annotation: A functional gene prediction tool that ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2001037024004331]
• 74. A network-enabled pipeline for gene discovery and validation ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11840947/]
• 75. -based clinical classification of... Saturation genome editing [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39779848/]
• 76. Saturation genome editing maps the functional spectrum of ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41588-024-01800-z]
• 77. of BRCA1 across cell types... | CoLab Saturation genome editing [https://colab.ws/articles/10.1101%2F2025.08.11.25333423]
• 78. NoAC: an automatic builder for knowledge bases and ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41106802/]
• 79. MaveDB 2024: a curated community database with over seven million... [https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13059-025-03476-y]
• 80. AI-guided Cas9 engineering provides an effective strategy ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12583830/]
• 81. Characterisation of Cellulose Synthase Like F6 ( CslF ) Mutants Shows... 6 [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7829222/]
• 82. Characterisation of Cellulose Synthase Like F6 (CslF6) ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2020.602850/full]
• 83. NEEDLE points to key gene regulators [https://www.glbrc.org/research/highlights/needle-points-key-gene-regulators]
• 84. Research highlight: NEEDLE points to key gene regulators [https://www.glbrc.org/news/research-highlight-needle-points-key-gene-regulators]