From Still to Steer

The Science of Powering Cows with Biofuel Leftovers

In a world striving for sustainability, the humble dairy cow has become an unexpected partner in the biofuel revolution, consuming the leftovers to create a circular economy.

The Dairy Farm Meets the Biofuel Plant

Imagine a dairy farmer carefully mixing the day's feed ration. A key ingredient in that mix isn't corn or hay, but a coarse, protein-rich powder that began its journey not in a field, but in a bioethanol refinery. This substance, known as dried distillers grains with solubles (DDGS), represents both the promise of sustainable agriculture and a significant scientific challenge. 1

Biofuel Production

The dramatic increase in bioethanol production has resulted in millions of tons of new co-products that nutritionists are scrambling to evaluate effectively.

Changing Feedstock

Ethanol companies adapt to fluctuating grain prices by mixing feedstocks such as wheat and corn in different ratios, creating various blended DDGS types.

The critical question became: How do we accurately predict the energy these diverse co-products provide to dairy cows? 1 7

The Energy Prediction Puzzle

At the heart of this challenge lies a fundamental question in animal nutrition: how do we determine the actual energy value of a feed ingredient? For dairy farmers, this isn't merely academic—it directly impacts milk production, operational costs, and farm profitability.

Two primary approaches have emerged in nutritional science, each with distinct methodologies and philosophical underpinnings.

The Chemical Approach: Calculations from Components

The NRC (National Research Council) chemical approach, as described in their 2001 guidelines, estimates energy values through mathematical equations based on the chemical composition of feeds. 1 7

Advantages:
  • Relatively fast and inexpensive
  • Provides consistent results
  • Based on standardized equations
Limitations:
  • Equations developed for native feeds
  • May not accurately represent processed co-products like DDGS
The Biological Approach: Real-World Simulation

In contrast, biological approaches including in situ (within the animal) incubation attempt to simulate actual digestive conditions. 1

The preferred method involves placing small feed samples in porous bags incubated within a live animal's rumen for 48 hours, directly measuring what disappears during digestion.

"an in situ assay may provide the best estimation of the total tract digestion, and consequently truly digestible nutrients and energy values." 1

Comparing Two Approaches to Predicting Feed Energy

Feature NRC Chemical Approach In Situ Biological Approach
Methodology Chemical analysis + equations Rumen incubation + measurement
Basis Developed for native feeds Simulates actual digestion
Advantages Fast, consistent, inexpensive Biologically relevant, accounts for rumen environment
Limitations May not accurately represent processed co-products Time-consuming, requires live animals
Primary Measurements Chemical components (protein, fiber, fat) Truly digestible nutrients

A Groundbreaking Experiment: Putting Theories to the Test

To resolve the debate between these approaches, researchers conducted a crucial investigation examining different DDGS types from multiple bioethanol plants. Their work would provide some of the first direct comparisons between chemical and biological prediction methods for these modern co-products. 1 7

Inside the Methodology: Step by Step

Sample Collection

Researchers gathered multiple batches of wheat DDGS, corn DDGS, and blended DDGS (wheat:corn = 70:30) from different bioethanol plants in Western Canada between May and December 2007. 1

In Situ Incubation

Samples were placed in porous synthetic bags and incubated in the rumen of cannulated dairy cows for 48 hours—the standard timeframe believed to best estimate total tract digestion. 1

Chemical Analysis

Parallel analysis determined the chemical composition of all samples, allowing for NRC equation-based predictions. 1

Comparison

Finally, researchers statistically compared the energy values obtained through both methods to identify any significant differences. 1

Revealing Results: Surprises and Confirmations

DDGS Type Matters

The biological approach confirmed that corn DDGS contained higher energy values than wheat DDGS, establishing corn DDGS as a superior energy source for dairy diets. 1 7

Prediction Methods Diverge

Significant differences appeared for tdNDF and tdCP, with the in situ method showing higher digestible fiber but the NRC method showing higher digestible protein. 1 7

Energy Values Similar

Despite nutrient prediction differences, the ultimate energy values showed no significant differences between the two approaches. 1 7

Energy Values of Different DDGS Types (Biological Approach) 1

DDGS Type TDN₁ˣ (%) DE₃ˣ (Mcal/kg) ME₃ˣ (Mcal/kg) NEL₃ˣ (Mcal/kg)
Corn DDGS 83.5° 4.08° 3.35° 2.09°
Blended DDGS 78.8° 3.84° 3.15° 1.96°
Wheat DDGS 75.5° 3.68° 3.02° 1.88°

Values in the same column with different superscript letters are significantly different (P<0.05)

Differences in Predicted Truly Digestible Nutrients Between Approaches 1 7

Nutrient Difference (NRC - In Situ) Statistical Significance
tdNDF -77.4 g/kg DM P<0.001
tdCP +47.9 g/kg DM P<0.001
tdFA +7.9 g/kg DM P<0.001
tdNFC +9.2 g/kg DM P<0.05

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Materials

Conducting such rigorous nutritional science requires specialized tools and methodologies. The table below details key components from the featured experiment and related studies that form the essential toolkit for researchers in this field.

Research Tool Function in Research Application Example
In Situ Bags Porous synthetic bags holding feed samples during rumen incubation Allows rumen fluids to interact with samples while containing solids for post-incubation measurement 1
Cannulated Animals Fistula surgically placed into rumen to access digestive environment Enables insertion and retrieval of in situ bags without harming the animal 1
Shotgun Metagenomics Advanced genetic analysis of microbial populations Identifies contaminant bacteria strains in bioethanol production that impact fermentation efficiency 5
Calorimeters Instruments measuring heat energy released from burning materials Determines gross energy content of feeds, feces, and urine in metabolic studies 2
Acid-Insoluble Ash Indigestible marker added to feed Tracks digestibility throughout the digestive tract in poultry and pig studies 8
CRISPR-Cas9 Gene editing technology for microorganisms Engineers filamentous fungi or yeast to improve enzyme production for biomass breakdown 3

Implications and Future Directions

This research carries significant practical implications for both the biofuel and dairy industries. The confirmation that NRC equations can reliably predict final energy values means nutritionists can formulate diets with confidence using more accessible chemical methods. However, the identified discrepancies in nutrient predictions suggest the NRC equations may benefit from refinement specifically for bioethanol co-products. 1 7

Future Research Directions
  • Developing more accurate prediction models
  • Incorporating both chemical and biological factors
  • Evaluating novel enzymes like CelOCE that improve biomass breakdown 3
  • Monitoring microbial contamination in ethanol production 5
Industry Impact
  • More consistent and higher-quality co-products
  • Improved fermentation efficiency in ethanol production
  • Better feed formulation for dairy operations
  • Enhanced sustainability of agricultural systems
Closing the Loop on Sustainability

The journey to understand how to best evaluate bioethanol co-products for dairy cows represents more than technical nutritional science—it's about closing the loop in agricultural systems. As we strive for more sustainable food and energy production, efficiently using every component of our agricultural output becomes increasingly crucial.

The collaboration between ethanol plants and dairy farms embodies the biorefinery concept, where biomass is fully utilized to create multiple products—in this case, fuel for vehicles and feed for animals. This research ensures that the valuable nutrients in bioethanol co-products aren't wasted but efficiently converted into milk and meat, contributing to a more sustainable agricultural future where little goes to waste.

References