Functional Validation of Plant NBS Genes Using VIGS: A Comprehensive Guide from Foundational Concepts to Advanced Applications

Abstract

This article provides a comprehensive resource for researchers and scientists on the functional validation of Nucleotide-Binding Site-Leucine Rich Repeat (NBS-LRR) genes using Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS). It covers the foundational biology of NBS genes as key plant immune receptors, detailed VIGS methodology including vector selection and delivery optimization, troubleshooting for recalcitrant species, and rigorous validation techniques. By synthesizing recent case studies from crops like cotton, soybean, and pepper, this guide bridges the gap between genomic discovery and functional characterization, enabling the rapid identification of disease resistance genes for crop improvement.

Understanding Plant NBS-LRR Genes: Architecture, Diversity, and Role in Innate Immunity

NBS-LRR Genes as Central Executors of Effector-Triggered Immunity (ETI)

Plants rely on a sophisticated innate immune system to defend against pathogen attacks. Within this system, Effector-Triggered Immunity (ETI) serves as a highly specific and powerful defense layer, primarily executed by nucleotide-binding site leucine-rich repeat (NBS-LRR) proteins. These intracellular immune receptors recognize pathogen effector proteins either directly or indirectly, initiating robust defense signaling that often culminates in a hypersensitive response (HR)—a form of programmed cell death at the infection site that restricts pathogen spread [1]. The NBS-LRR gene family represents one of the largest and most diverse gene families in plants, with significant variation in size and architecture across species. Recent studies have identified 12,820 NBS-domain-containing genes across 34 plant species, from mosses to monocots and dicots, classified into 168 distinct domain architecture classes [2]. This remarkable diversity underscores their central role in plant pathogen surveillance and defense execution, making them critical targets for understanding plant immunity and engineering disease-resistant crops.

NBS-LRR Diversity and Classification Across Plant Species

Structural Architecture and Phylogenetic Distribution

NBS-LRR proteins exhibit a modular domain architecture that forms the basis for their classification and functional specialization. These proteins typically contain a conserved nucleotide-binding site (NBS) domain responsible for nucleotide binding and hydrolysis, coupled with a C-terminal leucine-rich repeat (LRR) domain involved in pathogen recognition and protein-protein interactions [1] [3]. The N-terminal domain provides the primary classification criterion, dividing NBS-LRR proteins into two major subclasses: those with a Toll/Interleukin-1 receptor (TIR) domain (TNLs) and those with a coiled-coil (CC) domain (CNLs) [2] [1]. A third subclass featuring an N-terminal Resistance to Powdery Mildew8 (RPW8) domain has also been identified [2].

Table 1: NBS-LRR Gene Distribution Across Selected Plant Species

Plant Species	Total NBS Genes	TNL Genes	CNL Genes	Other Types	Reference
Nicotiana benthamiana	156	5	25	126 (N, NL, TN, CN)	[3]
Vernicia montana (resistant tung tree)	149	12 (TNL+TN)	98 (CNL+CN)	39 (Other)	[4] [5]
Vernicia fordii (susceptible tung tree)	90	0	49 (CNL+CN)	41 (Other)	[4] [5]
Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)	~2000 (estimated)	Multiple classes	Multiple classes	Multiple classes	[2]

Genome-wide analyses reveal significant variation in NBS-LRR repertoire size and composition across plant species. For example, in Nicotiana benthamiana, a model plant for plant-pathogen interaction studies, 156 NBS-LRR homologs have been identified, comprising 5 TNL-type, 25 CNL-type, 23 NL-type, 2 TN-type, 41 CN-type, and 60 N-type proteins [3]. Comparative studies between resistant and susceptible plant varieties often reveal correlations between NBS-LRR diversity and disease resistance. In tung trees, the Fusarium wilt-resistant Vernicia montana possesses 149 NBS-LRR genes, while the susceptible Vernicia fordii has only 90, with the resistant variety containing TIR-domain-containing NBS-LRRs entirely absent in the susceptible counterpart [4] [5].

Genomic Organization and Evolution

NBS-LRR genes are distributed non-randomly across plant genomes, typically showing a clustered distribution pattern that suggests their evolution involves tandem duplications of linked gene families [4] [5]. This arrangement facilitates the rapid generation of diversity necessary for keeping pace with evolving pathogens. Phylogenetic analyses of NBS-LRR genes across land plants have identified both core orthogroups (e.g., OG0, OG1, OG2) conserved across multiple species and unique orthogroups highly specific to particular species [2]. This evolutionary pattern reflects the dual need for conserved signaling mechanisms and species-specific pathogen recognition capabilities.

Molecular Mechanisms of NBS-LRR-Mediated Immunity

Pathogen Recognition Strategies

NBS-LRR proteins employ two primary strategies for pathogen detection, enabling them to recognize diverse pathogen effectors with high specificity:

• Direct Recognition: Some NBS-LRR proteins physically bind pathogen effector proteins through their LRR domains. This mechanism is exemplified by the rice Pi-ta protein that directly interacts with the Magnaporthe grisea effector AVR-Pita [1], and the flax L proteins that bind directly to variants of the flax rust AvrL567 effector [1].

• Indirect Recognition (Guard Hypothesis): Many NBS-LRR proteins monitor the integrity of host cellular components ("guardees") that are targeted by pathogen effectors. Effector-mediated modification of these host proteins triggers NBS-LRR activation. Well-characterized examples include:

  • The Arabidopsis RPM1 and RPS2 proteins, which guard the host protein RIN4. Pseudomonas syringae effectors AvrRpm1 and AvrB induce RIN4 phosphorylation, while AvrRpt2 cleaves RIN4, all leading to NBS-LRR activation [1].
  • The Arabidopsis RPS5 protein, which guards the protein kinase PBS1. Cleavage of PBS1 by the Pseudomonas effector AvrPphB activates RPS5-mediated immunity [1].
  • The tomato Prf protein, which guards the Pto kinase. Interaction between Pto and Pseudomonas effectors AvrPto or AvrPtoB leads to Prf activation [1].

Activation and Signaling Mechanisms

In their resting state, NBS-LRR proteins exist in an auto-inhibited conformation, often maintained by intramolecular interactions between domains. The potato Rx protein, a CC-NBS-LRR protein conferring resistance to Potato Virus X (PVX), exemplifies this regulation with intramolecular interactions between its LRR and CC-NBS domains [6]. Pathogen recognition disrupts these interactions, inducing conformational changes that promote exchange of ADP for ATP at the NBS domain [1]. This nucleotide exchange triggers further conformational changes, enabling the N-terminal domain to initiate downstream signaling.

Table 2: NBS-LRR Activation Mechanisms in Different Pathosystems

NBS-LRR Protein	Pathogen Effector	Recognition Mechanism	Activation Consequences	Reference
Rx (potato)	PVX Coat Protein	Indirect, conformational change	Disruption of intramolecular interactions, HR activation	[6]
Ym1 (wheat)	WYMV Coat Protein	Direct interaction	Nucleocytoplasmic redistribution, HR in roots	[7]
RPS5 (Arabidopsis)	AvrPphB (Pseudomonas)	Guards PBS1 kinase	PBS1 cleavage detection, HR activation	[1]
RPS2/RPM1 (Arabidopsis)	AvrRpt2/AvrRpm1 (Pseudomonas)	Guards RIN4 protein	RIN4 modification detection, HR activation	[1]

Different NBS-LRR subtypes utilize distinct signaling pathways. TNL proteins generally require the EDS1-PAD4-ADR1 signaling module, while CNL proteins often depend on NDR1-HIN1 signaling components. These pathways ultimately converge on the activation of defense genes, phytohormone signaling, and the hypersensitive response.

Functional Validation: VIGS as a Key Tool for NBS-LRR Characterization

Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) Methodology

Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) has emerged as a powerful reverse genetics tool for rapid functional characterization of NBS-LRR genes in plants. This technology leverages the plant's innate RNA silencing machinery, using modified viral vectors to deliver gene-specific sequences that trigger targeted degradation of complementary mRNA transcripts. The standard VIGS protocol involves:

• Vector Selection and Preparation: Binary vectors such as pTRV1 and pTRV2 (Tobacco Rattle Virus-based) are commonly used for VIGS in solanaceous plants like Nicotiana benthamiana [4] [8]. The target gene fragment (typically 200-500 bp) is cloned into the viral vector in reverse orientation to create a hairpin RNA structure.

• Agrobacterium-Mediated Delivery: The recombinant vectors are introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains (e.g., GV3101), which are then infiltrated into plant tissues using syringe infiltration or vacuum infiltration methods [4].

• Silencing Efficiency Validation: Successful gene silencing is confirmed through quantitative RT-PCR to measure transcript abundance and/or through phenotypic observation when silencing visible marker genes like phytoene desaturase (PDS) which causes photobleaching [4].

• Functional Assessment: Silenced plants are challenged with target pathogens, and disease responses are evaluated through symptom scoring, pathogen biomass quantification, and molecular marker analysis.

Case Studies of VIGS-Mediated NBS-LRR Validation

Several recent studies have successfully employed VIGS to validate the function of NBS-LRR genes in various plant-pathogen systems:

In tung trees, VIGS was used to demonstrate that Vm019719, a specific NBS-LRR gene upregulated in Fusarium wilt-resistant Vernicia montana, is essential for disease resistance. Silencing of Vm019719 in the resistant genotype converted it to Fusarium wilt susceptibility, confirming its critical role in defense [4] [5]. This study also revealed that the susceptible Vernicia fordii carries an allelic variant (Vf11G0978) with a deleted W-box element in its promoter, rendering it unresponsive to pathogen challenge.

In cotton, VIGS-mediated silencing of GaNBS (OG2) in resistant cotton demonstrated its putative role in reducing virus titer during cotton leaf curl disease infection, highlighting the importance of specific NBS-LRR orthogroups in viral disease resistance [2].

In soybean, VIGS provided functional evidence that a newly identified NBS-LRR gene on chromosome 2 (Glyma02g13380) confers resistance to multiple Soybean Mosaic Virus strains (SC4 and SC20) in the Kefeng-1 variety, challenging the previous paradigm of single-gene single-strain resistance [9].

Comparative Analysis of NBS-LRR Function in Viral, Fungal, and Bacterial Pathosystems

Viral Disease Resistance

NBS-LRR proteins provide resistance against diverse viral pathogens through recognition of various viral components. The wheat Ym1 gene, encoding a CC-NBS-LRR protein, confers resistance to Wheat Yellow Mosaic Virus (WYMV) by specifically interacting with the viral coat protein (CP). This interaction leads to nucleocytoplasmic redistribution of Ym1, triggering HR and preventing viral movement from roots to aerial tissues [7]. Similarly, the potato Rx protein recognizes PVX coat protein, while the tobacco N gene confers resistance to Tobacco Mosaic Virus through recognition of the viral replicase protein [3] [6].

Fungal Disease Resistance

In fungal pathosystems, NBS-LRR genes play crucial roles in defense against various pathogens. The tung tree Vm019719 gene provides resistance against Fusarium wilt [4] [5], while the tomato Cf genes confer resistance to Cladosporium fulvum through recognition of specific avirulence proteins [8]. A comparative analysis between resistant and susceptible tung tree varieties revealed that the loss of specific LRR domains in susceptible varieties may contribute to their inability to recognize pathogen effectors [4] [5].

Bacterial Disease Resistance

The Arabidopsis RPM1, RPS2, and RPS5 proteins exemplify NBS-LRR-mediated resistance against bacterial pathogens like Pseudomonas syringae. These proteins employ guard mechanisms to monitor host proteins targeted by bacterial effectors, activating immunity upon detection of host protein modifications [1]. The Arabidopsis RPS4 protein provides another example, recognizing the Pseudomonas effector AvrRps4 through direct interaction [1].

Table 3: NBS-LRR Mediated Resistance Across Different Pathogen Types

Pathogen Type	Representative NBS-LRR	Pathogen Effector Recognized	Recognition Mechanism	Key Defense Features
Virus	Ym1 (Wheat)	WYMV Coat Protein	Direct interaction	Root-specific expression, blocks systemic movement	[7]
Virus	Rx (Potato)	PVX Coat Protein	Indirect, conformational change	HR, requires NB-ARC integrity	[6]
Fungus	Vm019719 (Tung tree)	Fusarium effector (unknown)	Unknown, VIGS-validated	Differential expression in resistant vs. susceptible	[4] [5]
Fungus	Rpp1 (Soybean)	Phakopsora pachyrhizi effector	Direct or indirect	HR against Asian soybean rust	[4]
Bacterium	RPS5 (Arabidopsis)	AvrPphB (Pseudomonas)	Guards PBS1 kinase	Detects PBS1 cleavage	[1]
Bacterium	RPM1 (Arabidopsis)	AvrRpm1/AvrB (Pseudomonas)	Guards RIN4 protein	Detects RIN4 phosphorylation	[1]

Functional characterization of NBS-LRR genes relies on specialized research tools and reagents that enable precise manipulation and analysis of these complex immune receptors.

Table 4: Essential Research Reagents for NBS-LRR Characterization

Reagent/Resource	Function/Application	Examples	Key Features
VIGS Vectors	Transient gene silencing in plants	pTRV1, pTRV2 (TRV-based)	Binary system, effective in solanaceae	[3] [4] [8]
Hairpin RNAi Libraries	High-throughput R gene screening	N. benthamiana library (345 R genes)	Genome-wide coverage, functional screening	[8]
HMMER Software	Identification of NBS domains in genomes	Pfam NBS domain (PF00931)	Domain-specific HMM profiles	[2] [3] [4]
Agrobacterium Strains	Plant transformation and VIGS delivery	GV3101, LBA4404	Efficient plant cell transformation	[4] [8]
Expression Vectors	Protein localization & interaction studies	pCAMBIA1302-35S-EGFP	Fluorescent tagging, constitutive expression	[10]
OrthoFinder	Evolutionary analysis and orthogroup classification	Orthogroup clustering of NBS genes	Identifies core and lineage-specific NBS genes	[2]

NBS-LRR genes stand as central executors of effector-triggered immunity, providing plants with a sophisticated surveillance system against diverse pathogens. Their remarkable structural diversity, sophisticated activation mechanisms, and pathogen-specific recognition capabilities make them invaluable resources for crop improvement. The functional validation of these genes through VIGS and other reverse genetics approaches has dramatically accelerated our understanding of plant immunity mechanisms.

Future research directions will likely focus on understanding the precise structural basis of effector recognition, elucidating the complete signaling networks downstream of NBS-LRR activation, and developing innovative strategies for deploying these genes in durable resistance breeding. The integration of genome editing technologies with traditional resistance breeding will enable more precise manipulation of NBS-LRR genes, potentially creating novel resistance specificities or optimizing expression patterns for enhanced disease resistance. As our knowledge of NBS-LRR gene function expands, so too will our ability to engineer crops with robust, durable resistance to evolving plant pathogens, ultimately contributing to global food security.

Plant immunity relies on a sophisticated innate system where Nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat (NLR) proteins serve as critical intracellular immune receptors that activate defense responses upon pathogen detection [11] [12]. These proteins function as central executors of effector-triggered immunity (ETI), typically inducing stronger and faster defense responses including programmed cell death (hypersensitive response, HR) that effectively restricts pathogen colonization and proliferation [11]. The NLR gene family exhibits remarkable polymorphism and dynamics as plants counter rapidly evolving pathogens, with gene numbers varying drastically between species—from approximately 150 in Arabidopsis thaliana to over 500 in Oryza sativa (rice) [11].

The characteristic modular architecture of NLR proteins enables them to act as molecular switches. This architecture consists of:

• N-terminal signaling domain (TIR, CC, or RPW8)
• Central conserved nucleotide-binding domain (NBS, Nucleotide-Binding Site)
• C-terminal leucine-rich repeat (LRR) domain responsible for effector recognition or protein interactions [11] [13]

This review comprehensively compares the three major NLR subfamilies—CNL, TNL, and RNL—focusing on their domain architecture, functional mechanisms, and experimental approaches for their functional validation, particularly through Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS).

Classification and Domain Architecture of NLR Subfamilies

Based on their distinct N-terminal structural domains, NLR genes are classified into three principal subclasses [14]:

Table 1: Core Domain Architecture of NLR Subfamilies

Subfamily	N-terminal Domain	Central Domain	C-terminal Domain	Primary Function
CNL	Coiled-Coil (CC)	Nucleotide-Binding Site (NBS)	Leucine-Rich Repeat (LRR)	Pathogen effector detection
TNL	Toll/Interleukin-1 Receptor (TIR)	Nucleotide-Binding Site (NBS)	Leucine-Rich Repeat (LRR)	Pathogen effector detection
RNL	RPW8	Nucleotide-Binding Site (NBS)	Leucine-Rich Repeat (LRR)	Helper NLR for downstream signaling

The CC domain in CNL proteins typically forms alpha-helical bundles that facilitate oligomerization and signaling initiation [12]. The TIR domain in TNL proteins possesses enzymatic activity that often contributes to immune signaling pathways distinct from CNL-mediated responses. The RPW8 domain in RNL proteins, represented by members such as NRG1 and ADR1, functions primarily in signaling downstream of other NLR sensors [14].

Recent genomic studies across diverse plant taxa reveal dynamic evolutionary patterns among these subfamilies. Comparative analysis of four Apiaceae species showed all three subfamilies present but with significant variation in proportions, suggesting lineage-specific adaptations [14].

Figure 1: Domain Architecture and Functional Specialization of Plant NLR Proteins

Genomic Distribution and Evolution of NLR Subfamilies

Chromosomal Distribution and Gene Clustering

NLR genes frequently exhibit non-random chromosomal distribution patterns, with significant clustering observed particularly near telomeric regions. In pepper (Capsicum annuum), comprehensive genome-wide identification revealed 288 high-confidence canonical NLR genes, with Chromosome 09 harboring the highest density (63 NLRs) [11]. This clustering pattern facilitates rapid generation of new resistance alleles through local amplification and recombination [11].

Similar clustering patterns have been observed across diverse plant species. Analysis of four Apiaceae species (Angelica sinensis, Coriandrum sativum, Apium graveolens, and Daucus carota) identified NLR genes ranging from 95 in A. sinensis to 183 in C. sativum, with all species possessing all three NLR subclasses [14].

Evolutionary Mechanisms Driving NLR Expansion

The expansion of NLR gene families primarily occurs through three mechanisms [11]:

• Tandem duplication (primary driver, creating gene clusters)
• Segmental duplication
• Retrotransposition

In pepper, tandem duplication accounts for 18.4% of NLR genes (53/288), predominantly on Chr08 and Chr09 [11]. This duplication mechanism enables rapid adaptation to evolving pathogen effectors through sequence variation, particularly in the hypervariable LRR domain responsible for effector recognition [11].

Table 2: Genomic Features of NLR Genes Across Plant Species

Plant Species	Total NLR Genes	Tandem Duplication Rate	Chromosome with Highest NLR Density	Notable Features
Capsicum annuum (pepper)	288	18.4% (53/288)	Chr09 (63 genes)	Enrichment in telomeric regions
Arabidopsis thaliana	~150	Not specified	Not specified	Model for NLR studies
Oryza sativa (rice)	~500	Not specified	Not specified	High number of NLR genes
Angelica sinensis	95	Not specified	Not specified	Contracted NLR repertoire
Coriandrum sativum	183	Not specified	Not specified	Expanded NLR repertoire
Saccharum spp. (sugarcane)	Varies by cultivar	Not specified	Not specified	Complex polyploid genomes

Functional Validation of NLR Genes Using VIGS

Principles of Virus-Induced Gene Silencing

Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) is a powerful functional genomics tool that evokes a natural antiviral defense mechanism in plants [15]. This technique utilizes recombinant viruses containing partial sequences of target genes to trigger Post-Transcriptional Gene Silencing (PTGS), effectively downregulating gene expression in a transient manner [15] [16].

The major advantages of VIGS for NLR gene validation include:

• Rapid results compared to stable transgenic approaches
• Ability to silence individual or multiple genes in a single plant
• High-throughput application potential for screening candidate genes
• No requirement for stable transformation [15] [16]

VIGS is particularly valuable for functional characterization of NLR genes because it can overcome challenges posed by gene redundancy in large NLR families and the lethal phenotypes often associated with permanent NLR mutations [17] [15].

VIGS Experimental Workflow for NLR Validation

Figure 2: VIGS Workflow for Functional Validation of NLR Genes

The VIGS protocol for NLR genes typically involves:

• Target sequence selection: Unique 300-580 bp fragments from target NLR genes are cloned into appropriate VIGS vectors [16]
• Vector delivery: Recombinant viral vectors are delivered via Agrobacterium-mediated infiltration or mechanical inoculation [15]
• Silencing establishment: Plants are maintained for 2-3 weeks to allow systemic silencing [16]
• Functional assessment: Silenced plants are challenged with pathogens and evaluated for altered susceptibility [17] [16]

A high-throughput VIGS protocol has been developed using excised leaf disks from silenced plants, allowing simultaneous screening under multiple stress conditions [16]. This approach demonstrated that VIGS continues in excised tissues for more than six weeks, enabling flexible experimental designs [16].

Key Research Reagents for VIGS-based NLR Validation

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents for VIGS-based NLR Functional Analysis

Reagent/Resource	Function/Application	Examples	Experimental Considerations
VIGS Vectors	Delivery of target gene fragments to trigger silencing	TRV (Tobacco Rattle Virus), BSMV (Barley Stripe Mosaic Virus)	BSMV particularly useful for cereals [15]
Agrobacterium Strains	Delivery of viral vectors into plant cells	GV3101, LBA4404	Critical for efficient infection
Marker Genes	Visual monitoring of silencing efficiency	PDS (photobleaching), ChlH (yellowing)	Confirm silencing before pathogen tests [16]
Pathogen Isolates	Challenge tests for NLR function	Species-specific strains with known effectors	Must match NLR recognition specificity
Expression Plasmids	Effector expression for NLR recognition	Binary vectors with pathogen effectors	Test specific NLR-effector interactions
Reference Genes	qRT-PCR normalization for silencing verification	Actin, Ubiquitin, EF1α	Essential for quantifying silencing efficiency

Comparative Functional Analysis of NLR Subfamilies

Signaling Mechanisms and Immune Responses

The different NLR subfamilies activate defense responses through distinct signaling pathways:

CNL proteins typically form resistosomes upon activation, leading to calcium influx and downstream immune signaling [12]. Some CNLs function as sensor NLRs that directly or indirectly recognize pathogen effectors, while others act as helper NLRs that amplify defense signals [14].

TNL proteins activate immune responses through NADase activity, generating signaling molecules that activate downstream helpers [12]. Recent structural studies revealed that TNLs form oligomeric complexes similar to CNL resistosomes [12].

RNL proteins primarily function as helper NLRs that transduce signals from sensor CNLs and TNLs. They are essential for the signaling of many sensor NLRs and often require components like EDS1 (Enhanced Disease Susceptibility 1) [14].

Expression Patterns and Regulatory Elements

Analysis of promoter regions reveals distinct regulatory patterns among NLR subfamilies. In pepper, examination of promoter cis-regulatory elements (CREs) showed that 82.6% of NLR promoters (238 genes) contained binding sites for salicylic acid (SA) and/or jasmonic acid (JA) signaling pathways [11], indicating integration with phytohormone signaling.

Transcriptome profiling during pathogen infection demonstrates differential expression of NLR subfamilies. In pepper infected with Phytophthora capsici, 44 NLR genes showed significant differential expression between resistant and susceptible cultivars [11]. Protein-protein interaction network analysis predicted key interactions among these differentially expressed NLRs, with Caz01g22900 and Caz09g03820 identified as potential hubs [11].

Case Studies: Functional Validation of Specific NLR Genes

GaNBS in cotton: Silencing of GaNBS (orthogroup OG2) through VIGS demonstrated its putative role in virus tittering against cotton leaf curl disease [17]. Expression profiling showed upregulation of OG2, OG6, and OG15 orthogroups in different tissues under various biotic and abiotic stresses [17].

Sugarcane NLRs: Development of the DaapNLRSeek pipeline for accurate NLR prediction in complex polyploid sugarcane genomes identified paired NLRs, TIR-only, and TPK genes [13]. Functional validation showed that two sugarcane-paired NLRs induce immune responses in Nicotiana benthamiana [13].

SMV resistance in soybean: Identification of Glyma02g13380 as a candidate gene conferring resistance to Soybean Mosaic Virus strains SC4 and SC20 demonstrates how a single NLR gene can provide resistance against multiple pathogen strains [9]. This challenges the previous hypothesis of single dominant gene resistance against a single strain and underscores the potential for breeding multiple resistance sources [9].

The comprehensive comparison of CNL, TNL, and RNL subfamilies reveals both shared characteristics and distinct functional specializations in plant immunity. While all NLRs function as intracellular immune receptors, their domain architectures dictate specific signaling mechanisms, with CNLs and TNLs primarily acting as pathogen sensors and RNLs serving as helper NLRs for signal transduction.

The evolutionary dynamics of NLR genes, driven primarily by tandem duplication and positive selection, enable rapid adaptation to changing pathogen pressures. The development of sophisticated functional validation tools, particularly VIGS protocols, has dramatically accelerated the characterization of NLR gene function across diverse plant species.

Future research directions in NLR biology should focus on:

• Structural characterization of additional NLR resistosomes from different subfamilies
• Signaling network analysis to elucidate connections between different NLR subfamilies
• Advanced genome engineering to create novel disease resistance specificities
• Cross-species comparative genomics to identify conserved functional modules

The integration of genomic identification with efficient validation techniques like VIGS provides a powerful framework for both basic understanding of plant immunity and applied crop improvement through engineered disease resistance.

The nucleotide-binding site (NBS) gene family constitutes a critical line of defense in plant immune systems, encoding intracellular immune receptors that mediate effector-triggered immunity against diverse pathogens. The remarkable expansion and diversification of this gene family across plant genomes represent a cornerstone of plant-pathogen co-evolution. Among various mechanisms driving genome evolution, tandem duplication has emerged as a predominant force in the rapid lineage-specific expansion and functional diversification of NBS genes. This evolutionary process enables plants to continuously generate novel genetic variations for recognizing rapidly evolving pathogen effectors, facilitating an ongoing molecular "arms race."

Understanding the genomic distribution patterns and evolutionary drivers of tandem duplication is paramount for elucidating the mechanisms underlying plant disease resistance. This review synthesizes recent advances in characterizing NBS gene family expansion across diverse plant species, with particular emphasis on the role of tandem duplication in generating structural and functional diversity. Furthermore, we frame this discussion within the context of functional validation through Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS), a powerful reverse genetics approach that enables rapid in planta assessment of gene function in both model and non-model plant species.

Genomic Distribution Patterns of Tandemly Duplicated NBS Genes

Chromosomal Distribution and Clustering

Tandemly duplicated NBS genes exhibit non-random distribution patterns across plant genomes, frequently forming dense clusters in specific chromosomal regions. Research on pepper (Capsicum annuum) revealed significant clustering of NLR genes, particularly near telomeric regions, with chromosome 09 harboring the highest density (63 NLRs) [11]. Similarly, studies in barley (Hordeum vulgare) identified Long Duplication-Prone Regions (LDPRs) primarily located in subtelomeric regions across all seven chromosomes [18]. This preferential localization suggests that certain genomic environments are more conducive to duplication events and the maintenance of duplicated sequences.

The physical clustering of tandemly duplicated NBS genes has profound implications for their evolution and function. Clusters often consist of genes from the same phylogenetic lineage, suggesting origin through tandem duplication events [19]. However, heterogeneous clusters containing genes from different subfamilies also occur, potentially generated through mechanisms such as ectopic recombination or the accumulation of diverse members over evolutionary time [19]. The pepper genome analysis demonstrated that tandem duplication serves as the primary driver of NLR family expansion, accounting for 18.4% of NLR genes (53/288), predominantly on chromosomes 08 and 09 [11].

Presence-Absence Variation and the "Core-Adaptive" Model

Pan-genomic studies have revealed extensive presence-absence variation (PAV) for NBS genes across different accessions of the same species. Research on the ZmNBS gene family in maize utilizing a pan-genomic framework encompassing 26 inbred lines distinguished conserved "core" subgroups (e.g., ZmNBS31, ZmNBS17-19) from highly variable ones (e.g., ZmNBS1-10, ZmNBS43-60), supporting a "core-adaptive" model of resistance gene evolution [20]. This model suggests that a stable core of conserved NBS genes is maintained across lineages, while peripheral genes undergo rapid birth-and-death evolution, contributing to lineage-specific adaptation.

Table 1: Genomic Distribution Patterns of Tandemly Duplicated NBS Genes Across Plant Species

Species	Total NBS Genes	Tandem Duplication Percentage	Primary Chromosomal Locations	Notable Features
Pepper (Capsicum annuum)	288 canonical NLRs	18.4% (53/288) [11]	Chr08, Chr09 (highest density: 63 NLRs on Chr09) [11]	Preferential telomeric clustering [11]
Maize (Zea mays)	Not specified	Subtype-specific preferences [20]	Distributed across genome	"Core-adaptive" model with PAV [20]
Barley (Hordeum vulgare)	Not specified	Association with LDPRs [18]	Subtelomeric regions on all 7 chromosomes [18]	Enrichment of pathogenesis-related genes in LDPRs [18]
Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana)	~150 NBS-LRR genes [19]	Primary mechanism for cluster formation [19]	40 clusters across genome [19]	Homogeneous and heterogeneous clusters [19]

Evolutionary Drivers of Tandem Duplication and Family Expansion

Duplication Mechanisms and Selection Pressures

The expansion of NBS gene families is driven by multiple duplication mechanisms, each exhibiting distinct evolutionary patterns. Studies in maize revealed subtype-specific preferences, where canonical CNL/CN genes largely originated from dispersed duplications, while N-type genes were enriched in tandem duplications [20]. Evolutionary rate analysis further demonstrated that genes derived from different duplication mechanisms experience varying selection pressures. Whole-genome duplication (WGD)-derived genes typically exhibit strong purifying selection (low Ka/Ks ratios), preserving essential functions, whereas tandem and proximal duplications often show signs of relaxed or positive selection, enabling functional diversification [20].

This differential selection pressure facilitates the birth-and-death evolution characteristic of NBS genes, where new copies are continuously generated through duplication, with some retained under positive selection while others are pseudogenized or eliminated. The prevalence of recent duplicates in certain lineages underscores the ongoing nature of this process. For instance, zebrafish shows an exceptionally high proportion (24.4%) of duplicated genes with low Ks values (≤1.0), indicating recent, lineage-specific duplication events [21].

Association with Duplication-Prone Genomic Regions

Emerging evidence suggests that NBS genes are statistically associated with duplication-prone genomic regions. Research in barley identified Long Duplication-Prone Regions (LDPRs) characterized by elevated levels of duplicated sequences, with many well-studied pathogen resistance gene families (including NBS-LRRs and RLKs) independently identifiable by their associations with self-duplicating DNA [18]. These duplication-prone regions show a history of repeated long-distance 'dispersal' to distant genomic sites, followed by local expansion through tandem duplication.

This association between arms-race genes and duplication-inducing sequences represents a form of evolutionary cooperation, where lineages with pathogen defense genes located in duplication-prone regions enjoy a selective advantage through enhanced capacity for generating diversity. The enrichment of specific sequence motifs in these regions, such as Kb-scale tandem repeats, facilitates recurrent duplication events through mechanisms like non-allelic homologous recombination and replication slippage [18].

Table 2: Evolutionary Features of Different Duplication Mechanisms in NBS Genes

Duplication Mechanism	Evolutionary Rate (Ka/Ks)	Selection Pressure	Functional Outcome	Representative Examples
Tandem Duplication	Variable, often higher	Frequent positive selection [20]	Rapid functional diversification, neo-functionalization [20] [11]	Maize N-type genes [20]; Pepper NLRs on Chr08/09 [11]
Whole Genome Duplication	Low (strong purifying selection) [20]	Predominantly purifying selection [20]	Conservation of essential functions, subfunctionalization [20]	Maize conserved "core" subgroups [20]
Segmental Duplication	Intermediate	Variable	Expansion without immediate functional divergence	Not specified in search results
Dispersed Duplication	Variable	Variable	Creation of spatially distinct paralogs	Maize CNL/CN genes [20]

Functional Validation of Tandemly Duplicated NBS Genes Using VIGS

VIGS Methodology and Workflow

Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) has emerged as a powerful reverse genetics tool for functional characterization of NBS genes, particularly in species recalcitrant to stable genetic transformation. The fundamental principle of VIGS involves engineering plant viruses to carry fragments of target host genes, which upon infection, trigger sequence-specific RNA silencing of both the viral genome and endogenous host transcripts [22].

The general workflow for VIGS-mediated validation of NBS gene function comprises multiple critical stages. It begins with the identification of candidate NBS genes through genomic or transcriptomic analyses. This is followed by the amplification of gene-specific fragments (typically 200-500 bp) and their cloning into appropriate VIGS vectors. The subsequent steps involve the delivery of VIGS constructs into plants via various methods, monitoring of silencing efficiency through molecular assays, and finally, phenotypic assessment of silenced plants following pathogen challenge [2] [23] [9].

Application in NBS Gene Functional Analysis

VIGS has been successfully employed to validate the function of tandemly duplicated NBS genes in multiple plant species. In cotton, silencing of GaNBS (OG2) through VIGS demonstrated its putative role in virus tittering, establishing its function in defense against cotton leaf curl disease [2]. Similarly, VIGS has been utilized in flax to characterize the role of LuWRKY39 in resistance to Septoria linicola, where silenced plants showed enhanced susceptibility to pathogen infection [23]. The application of VIGS in watermelon using the pCF93 vector enabled high-throughput functional screening of 38 candidate genes, identifying eight involved in male sterility [22].

The utility of VIGS is particularly valuable for studying tandemly duplicated NBS genes, as it enables rapid functional assessment without the need for stable transformation. This approach allows researchers to overcome challenges associated with genetic redundancy among duplicated paralogs by enabling simultaneous silencing of multiple family members or targeting conserved domains. Furthermore, VIGS facilitates functional analysis in genetically intractable species and enables examination of genes essential for viability that might be lethal when knocked out in stable lines.

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents for VIGS-Based Functional Validation of NBS Genes

Reagent/Resource	Function/Application	Examples/Specifications
VIGS Vectors	Delivery of plant gene fragments to trigger RNA silencing	pCF93 (cucumber fruit mottle mosaic virus-based) [22], TRV-based vectors
Reverse Transcription Kit	cDNA synthesis for gene fragment amplification	Maxima H Minus First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit [23]
RNA Extraction Reagent	Isolation of high-quality RNA from plant tissues	RNAplant Plus Reagent [23]
qRT-PCR Reagents	Validation of gene silencing efficiency	SYBR Green master mixes, gene-specific primers [23]
Pathogen Isolates	Challenge tests for functional assessment	Cotton leaf curl virus [2], Septoria linicola [23], Phytophthora capsici [11]
Plant Growth Facilities	Controlled environment for plant maintenance and phenotyping	Growth chambers, greenhouse spaces with aphid-free conditions [9]

Case Studies: Integrated Approaches from Duplication Analysis to Functional Validation

Pepper NLR Family and Phytophthora capsici Resistance

A comprehensive study of the NLR gene family in pepper (Capsicum annuum) provides an exemplary case of integrating genomic distribution analysis with functional validation. Researchers identified 288 high-confidence canonical NLR genes, with chromosomal distribution analysis revealing significant clustering, particularly near telomeric regions [11]. Evolutionary analysis demonstrated that tandem duplication served as the primary driver of NLR family expansion, accounting for 18.4% of NLR genes, predominantly on chromosomes 08 and 09 [11].

Transcriptome profiling of Phytophthora capsici-infected resistant and susceptible cultivars identified 44 significantly differentially expressed NLR genes. Protein-protein interaction network analysis predicted key interactions among them, with Caz01g22900 and Caz09g03820 emerging as potential hubs [11]. The study further identified conserved and lineage-specific candidate NLR genes, including Caz03g40070, Caz09g03770, Caz10g20900, and Caz10g21150, providing valuable targets for molecular breeding programs aimed at enhancing disease resistance [11].

Soybean NBS Genes and SMV Resistance

Research on soybean mosaic virus (SMV) resistance illustrates the application of VIGS for functional validation of NBS genes conferring resistance to specific pathogen strains. Studies identified a candidate gene (Glyma02g13380) conferring resistance to SMV strains SC4 and SC20 in soybean cultivar Kefeng-1 [9]. The functional validation involved qRT-PCR analysis, virus-induced gene silencing, and gene sequencing, confirming the role of this NBS gene in providing dual resistance to different viral strains [9].

This case study challenged the previous hypothesis of a single dominant gene responsible for resistance against a single strain, demonstrating instead that one gene can provide resistance against multiple viral strains. This finding has significant implications for breeding strategies, underscoring the potential of leveraging multiple resistance sources to enhance SMV resistance in soybean cultivars [9].

The genomic distribution and evolutionary dynamics of tandemly duplicated NBS genes reflect the continuous adaptation of plants to evolving pathogen pressures. Evidence from diverse plant species consistently demonstrates that tandem duplication serves as a primary mechanism for the expansion and diversification of this crucial gene family, frequently resulting in non-random clustering in duplication-prone genomic regions, particularly subtelomeric areas. The association between arms-race genes and duplication-inducing sequences represents an evolutionary strategy that enhances the capacity for generating diversity in response to pathogen challenges.

The integration of evolutionary analysis with functional validation approaches, particularly VIGS, provides a powerful framework for elucidating the role of specific NBS genes in disease resistance. As genomic technologies continue to advance, enabling more comprehensive characterization of pan-genomic variation and duplication patterns, our understanding of the evolutionary drivers shaping NBS gene families will continue to deepen. These insights will prove invaluable for informed breeding strategies and biotechnological approaches aimed at enhancing crop disease resistance in the face of evolving pathogen threats.

The nucleotide-binding site leucine-rich repeat (NBS-LRR) gene family constitutes the largest class of plant disease resistance (R) genes, playing a pivotal role in the innate immune system against pathogens including bacteria, fungi, viruses, and nematodes [24]. Advances in whole-genome sequencing have enabled genome-wide identification and comparative analysis of these genes across crop species, providing insights into evolutionary dynamics and mechanisms for disease resistance improvement. This case study provides a systematic comparison of NBS-LRR genes between two economically important Solanaceae crops—eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) and pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)—framed within the broader context of functional validation using Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) methodologies. The objective analysis presented herein summarizes key genomic features, experimental protocols, and signaling pathways to facilitate informed decisions in resistance gene isolation and breeding strategies.

Comprehensive Genomic Landscape of NBS-LRR Genes

Genome-Wide Identification and Classification

Table 1: Genomic Features of NBS-LRR Genes in Eggplant and Pepper

Feature	Eggplant (S. melongena)	Pepper (C. annuum)
Total NBS-LRR Genes	269 [24]	1,665 (Zunla-1) to 2,042 (Chiltepin) [25]
Subfamily Classification	231 CNL, 36 TNL, 2 RNL [24]	71 nTNL, 16 TNL subfamilies [25]
Chromosomal Distribution	Uneven, clustered on chromosomes 10, 11, 12 [24]	Uneven, clustered distribution [25]
Gene Clusters	Information not specified in search results	Majority organized in clusters [25]
Key Expansion Mechanism	Tandem duplication events [24]	Amplification in specific subfamilies (e.g., Rpi-blb2, BS2) [25]
Representative Resistance	Bacterial wilt (Ralstonia solanacearum) [24]	Multiple pathogens; basis of expanded subfamilies [25]

The quantitative disparity in NBS-LRR gene numbers between eggplant (269 genes) and pepper (1,665-2,042 genes) represents one of the most striking findings from comparative genomics [24] [25]. This variation is not correlated with genome size or total gene count, suggesting distinct evolutionary paths and pathogen pressure [25]. Pepper's extensive gene family size results primarily from the dramatic amplification of genes within a few specific subfamilies, particularly Rpi-blb2 and BS2 [25]. In both species, these genes display uneven chromosomal distribution patterns, with notable clustering on specific chromosomes that facilitates coordinated evolution and new resistance specificities through recombination and diversifying selection [24] [25].

Structural and Evolutionary Characteristics

Structural analysis of eggplant NBS-LRR genes reveals high conservation in both amino acid sequences and their order, with eight conserved motifs identified across the family [24]. The predominance of coiled-coil (CC) NBS-LRR genes over TIR-NBS-LRR genes follows the typical pattern observed in dicot species, though the specific ratio differs substantially between these solanaceous crops [24] [25]. Evolutionary analyses indicate that tandem duplication events represent the primary mechanism for NBS-LRR gene expansion in eggplant, allowing for rapid adaptation to pathogen pressure [24]. The prevalence of presence/absence polymorphism among Solanaceae species highlights the dynamic nature of this gene family and explains the substantial interspecific variation observed [25].

Experimental Methodologies for Identification and Validation

Genome-Wide Identification Pipeline

Diagram 1: Workflow for Genome-Wide Identification of NBS-LRR Genes

The generalized workflow for genome-wide identification of NBS-LRR genes begins with Hidden Markov Model (HMM) searches using the NB-ARC domain (PF00931) as a query against the target genome [24]. For eggplant, this employed an E-value cutoff of 10⁻²⁰, after which species-specific HMM profiles were constructed to identify any additional divergent members that might have been missed by initial searches [24]. Subsequent domain verification steps utilize multiple databases including Pfam and SMART to confirm the presence of characteristic LRR (PF13855), TIR (PF01582), and RPW8 (PF05659) domains, while COILS software predicts coiled-coil domains with an E-value threshold of 0.9 [24]. Following identification, genes are classified into subfamilies (CNL, TNL, RNL) based on domain architecture and phylogenetic relationships [24] [25].

Functional Validation Through VIGS

Diagram 2: TRV-Based Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) Workflow

Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) has emerged as a powerful reverse genetics tool for rapid functional validation of candidate NBS-LRR genes, particularly in Solanaceae species [26]. The tobacco rattle virus (TRV)-based VIGS system demonstrates high efficiency in soybean, with silencing efficiencies ranging from 65% to 95% when delivered via Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated infection of cotyledon nodes [26]. This method induces systemic spread and effective silencing of endogenous genes, causing significant phenotypic changes suitable for functional characterization [26]. The optimized protocol involves cloning 300-500bp gene-specific fragments into the pTRV2 vector, transforming into Agrobacterium strain GV3101, and infecting plants through immersion for 20-30 minutes [26]. Silencing phenotypes typically emerge within 2-3 weeks post-inoculation, enabling rapid assessment of gene function in pathogen response [26].

Signaling Pathways and Defense Mechanisms

NBS-LRR-Mediated Defense Signaling

Diagram 3: NBS-LRR Protein Activation and Defense Signaling

NBS-LRR proteins function as intracellular immune receptors that activate defense signaling through specific recognition of pathogen effectors [24]. Activation occurs through three primary mechanisms: direct binding to pathogen effectors, indirect recognition via guard or decoy models where effectors modify host proteins, or through modification within the NBS-LRR proteins themselves [24]. Upon recognition, conformational changes activate downstream signaling, often initiated by the CC domain which triggers hypersensitive response (HR) and systemic acquired resistance [27]. In wheat, the Ym1 CC-NBS-LRR protein confers resistance to Wheat Yellow Mosaic Virus by recognizing the viral coat protein, leading to nucleocytoplasmic redistribution and HR activation [27]. Similarly, in soybean, specific NBS-LRR genes provide resistance against multiple Soybean Mosaic Virus strains through recognition of viral components and initiation of defense cascades [9] [28].

Transcriptional Regulation in Response to Pathogens

Transcriptome analyses reveal complex regulatory networks governing NBS-LRR gene expression during pathogen infection. In eggplant under Ralstonia solanacearum stress, nine SmNBS genes display differential expression patterns, with EGP05874.1 emerging as a promising candidate for bacterial wilt resistance [24]. Similarly, transcriptome profiling of eggplant and its wild relative Solanum torvum during root-knot nematode infection identifies 5,360 differentially expressed genes, predominantly involved in response to stimulus, protein phosphorylation, hormone signal transduction, and plant-pathogen interaction pathways [29]. Numerous transcription factors, including MYB, WRKY, and NAC families, show differential expression during infection, suggesting their involvement in regulating defense responses [29]. Hormonal signaling pathways, particularly abscisic acid, appear crucial in plant-nematode interactions, highlighting the integration of NBS-LRR genes within broader defense networks [29].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 2: Key Research Reagent Solutions for NBS-LRR Gene Studies

Reagent/Resource	Function/Application	Examples/Specifications
Reference Genomes	Foundation for gene identification and annotation	Eggplant: 'GUIQIE-1' [24], HQ-1315 [30], '67/3' [31]; Pepper: Zunla-1, Chiltepin [25]
VIGS Vectors	Functional validation through gene silencing	TRV-based systems (pTRV1, pTRV2) [26]; Agrobacterium GV3101 delivery [26]
Pathogen Strains	Phenotypic screening and resistance assessment	Ralstonia solanacearum (bacterial wilt) [24]; Meloidogyne incognita (root-knot nematode) [29]; SMV strains (soybean mosaic virus) [9]
Bioinformatics Tools	Genome analysis and annotation	HMMER (domain identification) [24]; Pfam/SMART (domain verification) [24]; phylogenetic analysis software [24] [25]
Experimental Populations	Genetic mapping and inheritance studies	RIL populations [31] [9]; Fâ‚‚ populations [9]; near-isogenic lines [27]
Thiamine pyrophosphate-d3	Thiamine pyrophosphate-d3, MF:C12H19ClN4O7P2S, MW:463.79 g/mol	Chemical Reagent
Hydrocortisone 21-Acetate-D3	Hydrocortisone 21-Acetate-D3, MF:C23H32O6, MW:407.5 g/mol	Chemical Reagent

The research reagents outlined in Table 2 represent essential tools for comprehensive NBS-LRR gene studies. High-quality reference genomes form the foundation for accurate gene identification and annotation, with multiple versions available for both eggplant and pepper [30] [31] [24]. VIGS vectors, particularly TRV-based systems, enable rapid functional validation without the need for stable transformation [26]. Well-characterized pathogen strains are crucial for phenotypic screening and resistance assessment, with specific pathogens showing differential interactions with NBS-LRR genes in each crop species [24] [9] [29]. Bioinformatics tools facilitate domain identification, phylogenetic analysis, and structural characterization, while specialized genetic populations support mapping and inheritance studies [31] [24] [9].

This comparative analysis reveals both conserved features and species-specific innovations in the NBS-LRR gene families of eggplant and pepper. The dramatic numerical expansion in pepper, driven by tandem duplication and selection in specific subfamilies, contrasts with the more modest family size in eggplant, suggesting different evolutionary trajectories and adaptation to distinct pathogen pressures. From a practical perspective, pepper's expanded NBS-LRR repertoire may provide broader resistance potential, though the functional significance of many duplicated genes remains to be determined. For both species, the integration of genome-wide identification with VIGS-based functional validation presents an efficient pipeline for candidate gene prioritization and characterization. Future research should focus on functional characterization of specific NBS-LRR subfamilies expanded in pepper, transfer of validated resistance genes between solanaceous crops, and engineering of synthetic NBS-LRR genes with expanded resistance specificities. The research methodologies and resources outlined in this guide provide a foundation for these advanced applications in resistance breeding and crop protection.

MicroRNA482 (miR482) is a conserved miRNA superfamily in plants that functions as a master regulator of disease resistance genes. This guide provides a comparative analysis of miR482's performance across various plant species, focusing on its role within the broader thesis of functionally validating plant NBS-LRR genes through Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) research. The miR482 family primarily targets nucleotide-binding site-leucine-rich repeat (NBS-LRR) genes, which constitute one of the largest families of plant disease resistance (R) genes responsible for effector-triggered immunity (ETI) [32] [33] [34]. By mediating post-transcriptional control of these R genes, miR482 serves as a critical negative regulator that fine-tunes plant immune responses to pathogen attacks [35] [36].

The biogenesis of miR482 follows the canonical miRNA pathway, where RNA polymerase II transcribes MIR482 genes into primary transcripts that are processed by DCL1 into precursor hairpins and finally into mature miR482 of approximately 22 nucleotides in length [34]. What makes miR482 particularly notable is its ability to trigger the production of secondary phased small interfering RNAs (phasiRNAs) from its target genes, creating an amplified silencing effect that can regulate multiple resistance genes simultaneously [37] [33]. This review systematically compares the regulatory performance of miR482 across plant species, examines its integration with VIGS technology for functional genomics, and provides essential methodological protocols for researchers investigating plant immune networks.

Comparative Performance of miR482 Across Plant Systems

Functional Diversity and Targeting Specificity

The miR482/2118 superfamily demonstrates both conserved functions and species-specific specializations across plant lineages. While its primary role in regulating NBS-LRR genes is conserved, recent research has revealed lineage-specific expansions of function, including involvement in plant development and hormone signaling [37] [34].

Table 1: Functional Specialization of miR482/2118 Superfamily Across Plant Lineages

Plant Category	Primary Targets	Secondary Targets	Biological Processes	Unique Characteristics
Eudicots	NBS-LRR genes [33]	Calcium ATPase [37]	Disease defense [38]	miR482 predominates [38]
Monocots	Long non-coding RNAs [37]	-	Reproductive development [37]	miR2118 predominates [38]
Gymnosperms	NBS-LRR genes [37]	-	Disease defense [37]	-
Litchi	NBS-LRR & Non-coding TASL genes [37]	Gibberellin receptor GID1 [37]	Seed development [37]	Lineage-specific pathway evolution

The functional diversification of miR482 is further exemplified by the co-regulation of both -3p and -5p strands from the same precursor molecule. While miR482-3p predominantly targets NBS-LRR genes, the -5p variants exhibit more diverse targeting specificities due to their shorter conserved sequences [34]. This dual-strand regulation significantly expands the regulatory capacity of a single miRNA locus and adds complexity to the post-transcriptional control of plant immunity.

Performance Metrics in Pathogen Response

Quantitative assessment of miR482 performance during pathogen infection reveals its crucial role as a dynamic regulator of plant immunity. Multiple studies across different plant-pathogen systems have demonstrated consistent patterns of miR482 expression and function.

Table 2: Experimental Performance Data of miR482 in Plant-Pathogen Interactions

Plant System	Pathogen	miR482 Response	Target Validation	Resistance Outcome	Experimental Evidence
Tomato	Phytophthora infestans [35]	Down-regulated [35]	NBS-LRR genes confirmed [35]	Overexpression increased susceptibility; Silencing enhanced resistance [35]	STTM silencing, overexpression
Apple	Alternaria alternata (ALT1) [33]	Altered expression [33]	NBS-LRR (MdRNL family) [33]	Negative regulation of resistance [33]	sRNA-seq, degradome analysis
Cotton	Verticillium dahliae [36]	-	GhRSG2 (CNL) confirmed [36]	miR482b knockdown enhanced resistance; Target silencing increased susceptibility [36]	VIGS, gene expression analysis
Potato	Verticillium dahliae [34]	-	NBS-LRR genes [34]	Overexpression increased susceptibility [34]	Transgenic approaches

The consistent finding across multiple studies is that miR482 acts as a negative regulator of plant immunity. Pathogen infection typically leads to downregulation of miR482 expression, which in turn releases the repression of its NBS-LRR target genes and activates defense responses [33] [35]. This negative regulatory role positions miR482 as a crucial balancing factor in the plant immune system, preventing inappropriate activation of defense mechanisms while allowing rapid response upon pathogen recognition.

VIGS Methodology for Functional Validation of NBS-LRR Genes

Principles and Applications of VIGS Technology

Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) serves as a powerful functional genomics tool for validating NBS-LRR gene function in plant immunity research. VIGS operates through the plant's natural post-transcriptional gene silencing (PTGS) machinery, utilizing recombinant viral vectors to trigger sequence-specific suppression of endogenous gene expression [39]. The fundamental principle involves engineering viral vectors to carry fragments of target plant genes; when infected, the plant's RNA interference machinery processes these sequences into small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) that guide the silencing of corresponding endogenous mRNAs [39] [26].

The TRV-based VIGS system has emerged as particularly valuable for Solanaceae family plants, including pepper and tomato, due to its broad host range, efficient systemic movement, and minimal viral symptoms [39] [26]. The bipartite TRV genome requires two vectors: TRV1, encoding replication and movement proteins, and TRV2, containing the coat protein and a cloning site for inserting target gene fragments [39]. This system typically achieves silencing efficiencies ranging from 65% to 95% in optimized protocols [26], making it sufficiently robust for functional characterization of NBS-LRR genes in the context of miR482 regulation.

Integrated Experimental Protocol for miR482-NBS-LRR Validation

Phase 1: Vector Construction and Preparation

• Insert Design: Amplify 200-500 bp gene-specific fragment from target NBS-LRR gene or miR482 precursor using sequence-specific primers with added restriction sites [35] [26]
• Cloning: Ligate fragment into TRV2 vector using appropriate restriction enzymes (e.g., EcoRI and XhoI) and transform into DH5α competent cells [26]
• Validation: Sequence confirmed recombinant plasmids and transform into Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101 [35] [26]

Phase 2: Plant Inoculation and Silencing

• Agrobacterium Culture: Grow transformed Agrobacterium cultures in selective media with antibiotics to OD600 = 1.0-1.5 [35]
• Inoculum Preparation: Resuspend bacterial pellets in infiltration medium (10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM MES, 20 μM acetosyringone) [35]
• Delivery Method: For soybean and challenging plants, use cotyledon node immersion for 20-30 minutes; for tomato and Nicotiana, use leaf infiltration or vacuum infiltration [35] [26]
• Incubation: Maintain inoculated plants at 20-22°C with high humidity for 2-3 days, then transfer to normal growth conditions [35]

Phase 3: Efficiency Validation and Phenotyping

• Silencing Confirmation: Assess target gene knockdown 2-3 weeks post-inoculation using qRT-PCR [26]
• Phenotypic Assessment: Inoculate silenced plants with pathogen of interest and evaluate disease symptoms, lesion size, and pathogen biomass over time [35] [36]
• Molecular Analysis: Monitor expression changes in miR482, target NBS-LRR genes, and defense markers (e.g., PR1, PR2) [33] [36]

The following diagram illustrates the integrated workflow for using VIGS to study the miR482-NBS-LRR regulatory module:

Critical Optimization Factors for VIGS Efficiency

Successful implementation of VIGS for miR482-NBS-LRR studies requires careful optimization of several key parameters:

• Insert Design: Fragments of 200-500 bp with minimal self-complementarity provide optimal silencing efficiency [39]
• Plant Developmental Stage: Younger plants (3-4 leaf stage) generally show more efficient silencing than mature plants [39]
• Agroinoculum Concentration: OD600 of 1.0-1.5 typically balances infection efficiency with plant health [35] [26]
• Environmental Conditions: Temperature (20-22°C), humidity (>80% initially), and photoperiod significantly impact silencing efficiency and persistence [39]
• Genotype Specificity: Plant genotype and genetic background can substantially influence VIGS efficiency, requiring protocol adjustments [39]

The miR482 Regulatory Network: Molecular Mechanisms and Signaling Pathways

The miR482 regulatory network operates through multiple molecular mechanisms that extend beyond simple target gene repression. Understanding these complex interactions is essential for comprehensive functional validation of NBS-LRR genes.

Core Regulatory Circuit and phasiRNA Amplification

The canonical miR482 pathway involves direct targeting of NBS-LRR transcripts, typically recognizing conserved sequences encoding the P-loop motif of these resistance proteins [36] [34]. This initial targeting triggers a remarkable amplification mechanism through the production of phased secondary siRNAs (phasiRNAs). After miR482-mediated cleavage of the target transcript, the 3' fragment is converted into double-stranded RNA by RNA-DEPENDENT RNA POLYMERASE 6 (RDR6) and SUPPRESSOR OF GENE SILENCING 3 (SGS3), which is then processed by DICER-LIKE 4 (DCL4) into 21-nucleotide phasiRNAs in a phased arrangement [33] [34]. These phasiRNAs can act in cis to reinforce silencing of their precursor transcripts or in trans to target additional homologous NBS-LRR genes, creating a robust and amplified silencing network [37] [33].

The following diagram illustrates the core molecular mechanism of miR482-mediated regulation and its connection to the VIGS technology platform:

Expanded Regulatory Networks and Cross-Talk

Beyond the core pathway, miR482 participates in more complex regulatory networks that involve multiple molecular players:

• miR482-5p Function: The passenger strand miR482-5p, once considered non-functional, has been shown to regulate distinct targets and contribute to immune regulation [34]
• ceRNA Networks: Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and circular RNAs can function as competing endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs) that sequester miR482, thereby modulating its availability for target repression [38] [34]
• Hormonal Cross-Talk: The miR482 pathway interfaces with hormone signaling networks, particularly gibberellin pathways, as demonstrated in litchi where miR482/2118 targets non-coding transcripts that produce phasiRNAs regulating the gibberellin receptor GID1 [37]
• Feedback Regulation: Transcription factors induced by defense signaling can in turn regulate MIR482 gene expression, creating feedback loops that fine-tune immune responses [37]

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents for miR482-NBS-LRR Studies

Reagent Category	Specific Examples	Function/Application	Key Features
VIGS Vectors	TRV1/TRV2 system [39] [26]	Target gene silencing	Broad host range, minimal symptoms
	BPMV-based vectors [26]	Soybean gene silencing	High efficiency in legumes
Agrobacterium Strains	GV3101 [35] [26]	Vector delivery	High transformation efficiency
Validation Tools	qRT-PCR primers [33]	Expression analysis	Target-specific design
	sRNA-seq protocols [33]	miRNA profiling	Genome-wide miR482 detection
	Degradome sequencing [33]	Target identification	Direct cleavage site mapping
Modulation Tools	STTM482 [35]	miR482 silencing	Specific miRNA inhibition
	Overexpression vectors [35]	miR482 enhancement	Constitutive or inducible
Bioinformatics	psRNATarget [38]	Target prediction	miRNA-target identification
	miRBase [38]	miRNA database	Curated miRNA sequences

This comparison guide demonstrates that miR482 serves as a central regulator in plant immune networks through its conserved targeting of NBS-LRR genes. The integration of VIGS technology provides a powerful methodological platform for functional validation of these regulatory relationships. Key insights emerge from cross-species comparison: while the core miR482-NBS-LRR module is conserved across eudicots and gymnosperms, lineage-specific expansions have created species-specific regulatory circuits that interface with developmental and hormonal pathways.

The experimental data consistently show that miR482 functions as a negative regulator of immunity, with its suppression leading to enhanced resistance across multiple plant-pathogen systems. The VIGS methodology, particularly TRV-based systems, offers efficient, high-throughput functional validation with silencing efficiencies reaching 65-95% in optimized protocols. Future research directions should focus on elucidating the complex regulatory networks that connect miR482 with other signaling pathways, and leveraging this knowledge for developing crop varieties with enhanced disease resistance through breeding or biotechnology approaches.

VIGS Methodology for NBS Gene Silencing: Protocols, Vectors, and Delivery Systems

Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) has emerged as a powerful reverse genetics tool for rapid functional validation of plant genes, circumventing the challenges of stable genetic transformation. For researchers investigating nucleotide-binding site (NBS) domain genes—one of the largest superfamilies of plant disease resistance genes—selecting the appropriate viral vector is crucial for successful functional characterization [2]. This guide provides an objective comparison of the most prominent VIGS vectors, focusing on the tobacco rattle virus (TRV) and bean pod mottle virus (BPMV) systems, with supporting experimental data to inform vector selection for functional genomics research.

Vector Comparison: Technical Specifications and Performance Metrics

The choice of viral vector significantly influences silencing efficiency, tissue coverage, and experimental feasibility. Below is a detailed comparison of the most widely used VIGS systems.

Table 1: Comprehensive Comparison of Major VIGS Vectors

Vector Feature	TRV (Tobacco Rattle Virus)	BPMV (Bean Pod Mottle Virus)	Geminivirus-Based Vectors
Virus Type	RNA virus	RNA virus	DNA virus (e.g., BeYDV, WDV)
Optimal Host Range	Dicots (e.g., soybean, tomato, tobacco, walnut) [26] [40]	Primarily soybean [41]	Broad (e.g., tobacco, tomato, wheat, rice) [42] [43]
Silencing Efficiency	65% - 95% in soybean [26]; ~48% in walnut [40]	Near-complete in leaves and flowers [41]	High for genome engineering applications [42]
Key Strengths	Effective meristem silencing; mild symptomology; broad dicot host range [26] [40]	Highly efficient and stable in soybean; strong systemic silencing [41]	High cargo capacity; efficient for delivering genome editing reagents [42] [43]
Documented Limitations	Lower efficiency in some monocots [42]	Primarily restricted to soybean; can cause leaf symptoms that interfere with phenotyping [26]	More complex vector construction [43]
Tissue Coverage	Leaves, stems, flowers, roots, meristems [26] [40]	Leaves, stems, flowers, roots (weaker in roots) [41]	Primarily leaves and other vegetatively infected tissues
Silencing Onset & Duration	Observable from 14-21 dpi; can persist for several weeks [26] [41]	Observable from 14 dpi; sustained for at least 35 dpi in leaves [41]	Varies by specific vector and host
Delivery Method	Agrobacterium-mediated (cotyledon node infection, injection, rubbing) [26] [40]	Particle bombardment or Agrobacterium-mediated [26]	Agrobacterium-mediated infiltration [43]

Table 2: Vector Selection Guide for Specific Research Applications

Research Goal	Recommended Vector	Supporting Evidence
Functional Validation of NBS Genes	TRV for broad dicot coverage; BPMV for soybean-specific studies	Successful silencing of defense-related genes like GmRpp6907 and GmRPT4 in soybean [26]
Root Tissue Studies	TRV or BPMV	Both systems demonstrated root silencing capability, with BPMV showing somewhat weaker root silencing [41]
Flower/Meristem Studies	TRV	TRV's documented capability to silence genes in meristematic tissues [40]
Delivery of Genome Engineering Reagents	Geminivirus vectors (e.g., BeYDV, WDV)	10-12 fold increase in gene targeting efficiency compared to standard T-DNA delivery [43]
Rapid High-Throughput Screening	TRV	Faster and avoids complexity of plant genetic transformation systems [40]

Experimental Protocols and Methodologies

TRV-Based VIGS Protocol for Soybean

Recent advancements have optimized TRV-VIGS for efficient gene silencing in soybean, a species traditionally recalcitrant to genetic transformation [26]. The optimized protocol involves:

• Vector Construction: Clone target gene fragment (e.g., 255 bp for optimal efficiency) [40] into pTRV2 vector using appropriate restriction sites (e.g., EcoRI and XhoI) [26].

• Agrobacterium Preparation: Transform recombinant pTRV2 and helper pTRV1 vectors into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101.

• Plant Infection: Use cotyledon node infection method where:

  • Soybean seeds are bisected to obtain half-seed explants
  • Fresh explants are immersed in Agrobacterium suspension (OD600 = 1.0-1.5) for 20-30 minutes [26]
  • Alternative methods include rubbing plus injection for species like Lilium [44]

• Silencing Validation: Monitor phenotypes (e.g., photobleaching for PDS silencing) and verify silencing efficiency via qRT-PCR.

This optimized method achieves infection efficiencies exceeding 80%, reaching up to 95% in specific soybean cultivars like Tianlong 1 [26].

BPMV-Based VIGS Protocol for Soybean

The established BPMV protocol offers robust silencing in soybean tissues:

• Construct Design: Clone target sequence into BPMV IA-V1 vector, with 3' antisense orientation constructs showing highest efficiency [41].

• Delivery Methods: Utilize particle bombardment or Agrobacterium-mediated delivery.

• Temporal Analysis: Silencing observable as early as 14 days post-inoculation (dpi) in leaves, persisting to 35 dpi, with strong floral silencing at 49 dpi [41].

• Spatial Confirmation: Document uniform silencing across all cell types in cross-sections of stems and leaf petioles [41].

Visualizing the VIGS Workflow for NBS Gene Validation

The diagram below illustrates the complete experimental workflow for functional validation of NBS genes using VIGS technology.

VIGS Workflow for NBS Gene Functional Analysis

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Successful implementation of VIGS technology requires specific biological materials and reagents. The table below outlines essential components for establishing an efficient VIGS system.

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents for VIGS Experiments

Reagent/Resource	Function/Purpose	Examples/Specifications
VIGS Vectors	Carry target gene fragment and facilitate viral movement	pTRV1 (helper), pTRV2 (insert vector); BPMV-IA-V1 [26] [41]
Agrobacterium Strains	Deliver viral vectors into plant cells	GV3101, EHA105 [26] [40]
Marker Genes	Visual indicator of silencing efficiency	Phytoene desaturase (PDS) for photobleaching phenotype [26] [44] [40]
Infiltration Buffers	Facilitate Agrobacterium delivery	Acetosyringone-containing induction buffers [26]
Validation Tools	Confirm silencing at molecular level	qRT-PCR primers; Western blot reagents for protein detection
Positive Control Targets	System validation	Endogenous genes like GmPDS, GmRpp6907, GmRPT4 [26]
DMT-dT Phosphoramidite-15N2	DMT-dT Phosphoramidite-15N2, MF:C40H51N4O8P, MW:748.8 g/mol	Chemical Reagent
Cbz-Lys-Lys-PABA-AMC diTFA	Cbz-Lys-Lys-PABA-AMC diTFA, MF:C40H47F3N6O10, MW:828.8 g/mol	Chemical Reagent

Case Studies in NBS Gene Validation

Successful NBS Gene Silencing in Cotton

Research on cotton leaf curl disease demonstrated the utility of VIGS for validating NBS gene function. Silencing of GaNBS (OG2) in resistant cotton through VIGS confirmed its role in virus tittering, establishing a direct link between this NBS domain gene and disease resistance [2]. This study analyzed 12,820 NBS-domain-containing genes across 34 plant species, identifying both classical and species-specific structural patterns, with VIGS serving as the final functional validation step [2].

Soybean Disease Resistance Gene Validation

The TRV-VIGS system has successfully silenced key soybean resistance genes including:

• GmRpp6907: A rust resistance gene
• GmRPT4: A defense-related gene
• GmPDS: Marker gene for system validation [26]

These applications demonstrate the robustness of VIGS for functional analysis of disease resistance genes in economically important crops.

Emerging Trends and Future Perspectives

Recent advancements in VIGS technology focus on improving efficiency and expanding applications:

• Binary Vector Engineering: Recent innovations in binary vector copy number engineering have demonstrated potential to significantly improve Agrobacterium-mediated transformation efficiency. One study reported 60-100% improvement in stable transformation efficiency in Arabidopsis thaliana and 390% improvement in yeast through directed evolution of origin of replication mutations [45].

• Integration with Genome Editing: Viral vectors, particularly geminiviruses, are increasingly used to deliver CRISPR/Cas9 components for precise genome editing. Geminivirus-based replicons have shown 10-12 fold increases in gene targeting efficiency compared to standard T-DNA delivery [43].

• Host Range Expansion: Ongoing research continues to expand VIGS applications to previously recalcitrant species, including woody plants like walnut, where TRV-based systems have achieved approximately 48% silencing efficiency [40].

Selecting the appropriate viral vector for VIGS-based functional validation of NBS genes requires careful consideration of host species, target tissues, and research objectives. TRV offers broad utility across dicot species with efficient meristem silencing, while BPMV remains the gold standard for soybean-specific studies. Geminivirus vectors provide unique advantages for genome engineering applications. By leveraging the experimental data and protocols presented in this guide, researchers can make informed decisions to optimize their VIGS experiments, accelerating the functional characterization of plant NBS genes and facilitating the development of disease-resistant crop varieties.

Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) has emerged as a powerful reverse-genetics tool for elucidating gene function in plants, particularly for species recalcitrant to stable transformation. This technique utilizes recombinant viral vectors to trigger post-transcriptional gene silencing (PTGS) of endogenous plant genes, enabling rapid functional characterization without the need for stable genetic transformation [39]. For nucleotide-binding site (NBS) domain genes—one of the largest superfamilies of plant resistance genes involved in pathogen responses—VIGS provides an invaluable methodology for validating their roles in disease resistance pathways [2]. The functional validation of plant NBS genes through VIGS research represents a critical approach for understanding plant immunity mechanisms and identifying genetic elements capable of conferring resistance to devastating pathogens, such as those causing cotton leaf curl disease (CLCuD) [2].

Among various viral vectors, Tobacco Rattle Virus (TRV) has gained prominence as one of the most versatile and widely adopted systems for VIGS, characterized by its broad host range, efficient systemic movement, and mild symptomology that minimizes phenotypic interference [39] [46]. The Agrobacterium-mediated delivery of TRV vectors, known as agroinfiltration, has further enhanced the applicability of VIGS across diverse plant species, from model organisms to economically important crops [26]. This protocol provides a comprehensive, step-by-step guide for implementing TRV-based VIGS, from initial fragment cloning through final agroinfiltration, specifically contextualized within the functional validation of plant NBS genes.

Molecular Mechanism of VIGS

VIGS operates by hijacking the plant's innate RNA interference (RNAi) machinery, which naturally functions as an antiviral defense system. The process begins when double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) replication intermediates of the recombinant virus are recognized and processed by the plant's Dicer-like (DCL) enzymes into 21-24 nucleotide small interfering RNAs (siRNAs). These siRNAs are then incorporated into an RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), which guides the sequence-specific degradation of complementary viral mRNA—and crucially, any endogenous mRNA sharing sufficient sequence homology with the inserted fragment [39]. This mechanism enables targeted silencing of plant genes using fragments as short as 200-500 bp cloned into the viral vector [47].

The following diagram illustrates this molecular process and the subsequent experimental workflow for functional gene validation:

Figure 1: VIGS Molecular Mechanism and Workflow. The process begins with target fragment cloning, followed by Agrobacterium-mediated delivery, activation of the plant's RNAi machinery, and culminates in systemic gene silencing and validation.

Comparative Analysis of VIGS Systems

Viral Vector Systems

While multiple viral vectors have been developed for VIGS, TRV-based systems have demonstrated particular effectiveness across diverse plant species, including those with complex genomes or recalcitrant to transformation. The bipartite TRV system consists of two plasmids: TRV1, encoding replicase and movement proteins for viral replication and systemic spread, and TRV2, containing the coat protein gene and a multiple cloning site for insertion of target gene fragments [39]. The comparative efficiency of various Agrobacterium strains and viral vectors has been systematically evaluated across different plant systems, providing researchers with evidence-based selection criteria.

Table 1: Comparison of Viral Vectors for VIGS Applications

Vector Type	Host Range	Silencing Efficiency	Key Advantages	Reported Silencing Duration	Optimal Plant Developmental Stage
TRV	Broad (Solanaceae, Asteraceae, etc.)	65-95% [26]	Mild symptoms, meristem invasion [39]	2-6 weeks	Varies by species: germinated seeds [46] to young seedlings [48]
BPMV	Primarily legumes	High in soybean [26]	Well-optimized for soybean	3-5 weeks	Early vegetative stages [26]
BSMV	Monocots, especially cereals	Moderate to high [46]	Effective in monocots	2-4 weeks	Seedling stage
CLCrV	Cotton, tobacco	Moderate [39]	Cotton-specific optimization	3-5 weeks	Early seedling stage

Agrobacterium Strain Efficiency

The choice of Agrobacterium strain significantly impacts transformation efficiency and subsequent silencing effectiveness. Comparative studies in Fragaria vesca demonstrated that strain EHA105 achieved the highest transient expression of reporter genes, followed by GV3101, LBA4404, and MP90 [49]. However, GV3101 remains widely adopted due to its balanced efficiency and ease of handling [46] [26]. Critical factors influencing strain performance include chromosomal background, virulence gene complement, and compatibility with plant species-specific recognition mechanisms.

Table 2: Agroinfiltration Parameter Optimization Across Plant Systems

Plant Species	Optimal Agrobacterium Strain	OD600	Acetosyringone (μM)	Infiltration Method	Silencing Efficiency
Soybean	GV3101 [26]	0.6-0.8 [26]	200 [26]	Cotyledon node immersion [26]	65-95% [26]
Atriplex canescens	GV3101 [46]	0.8-1.0 [46]	200 [46]	Vacuum infiltration (0.5 kPa, 10 min) [46]	~16.4% (whole plant) [46]
Walnut	GV3101 [48]	1.1 [48]	200 [48]	Leaf injection [48]	Up to 48% [48]
Fragaria vesca	EHA105 [49]	0.6-1.0 [49]	100-200 [49]	Multi-site leaf infiltration [49]	Not specified

Step-by-Step VIGS Protocol

Target Fragment Selection and Vector Construction

The initial step in VIGS implementation involves careful selection of a target-specific fragment from the gene of interest. For NBS domain genes, which often belong to large gene families with conserved motifs, particular attention must be paid to fragment specificity to avoid unintended silencing of homologous genes [2].

• Fragment Design: Select a 200-500 bp gene-specific fragment with minimal similarity to non-target genes. For NBS genes, target variable regions rather than highly conserved domains like P-loop or kinase domains [2]. Online tools such as SGN-VIGS (https://vigs.solgenomics.net/) facilitate the selection of optimal fragments with high specificity [46] [47].

• Primer Design: Incorporate appropriate restriction enzyme sites (e.g., EcoRI, BamHI, XhoI) at the 5' ends of forward and reverse primers to facilitate directional cloning [26] [46].

• Fragment Amplification: Perform PCR amplification using high-fidelity DNA polymerase to minimize mutations. The typical reaction includes: 2 μL cDNA template, 2.5 μL each forward and reverse primer (10 μM), 25 μL 2× PCR master mix, and nuclease-free water to 50 μL total volume. Cycling parameters: initial denaturation at 98°C for 4 min; 30 cycles of 98°C for 10 s, 55-60°C for 15 s, 72°C for 20 s; final extension at 72°C for 5 min [47].

• Cloning into TRV2 Vector: Digest both the PCR product and pTRV2 vector with appropriate restriction enzymes. Purify fragments and ligate using T4 DNA ligase. Transform into E. coli DH5α competent cells and select positive colonies on kanamycin-containing media. Verify insert sequence and orientation by colony PCR and sequencing [26].

Agrobacterium Preparation

The preparation of Agrobacterium cultures represents a critical determinant of VIGS efficiency, requiring precise control of bacterial density and induction conditions.

• Plasmid Transformation: Introduce recombinant pTRV2 and pTRV1 plasmids into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 or EHA105 using freeze-thaw transformation [46].

• Culture Initiation: Plate transformed bacteria on YEP or LB agar containing appropriate antibiotics (50 mg/L kanamycin for TRV vectors, 50 mg/L rifampicin for GV3101). Incubate at 28°C for 48 hours [46] [47].

• Liquid Culture: Inoculate single colonies into 100 mL YEP liquid medium with antibiotics. Culture at 28°C with shaking at 200-240 rpm until mid-logarithmic growth phase (OD600 = 0.6-1.0, approximately 5-6 hours) [46] [26].

• Induction: Pellet bacteria by centrifugation at 6000 rpm for 8 minutes. Resuspend in infiltration buffer (10 mM MES, 200 μM acetosyringone, 10 mM MgClâ‚‚) to final OD600 of 0.8-1.0. Add 0.03% Silwet-77 as surfactant [46]. Incubate suspended cultures at room temperature in darkness for 3 hours to induce virulence gene expression [46].

• Combination: Mix equal volumes of TRV1 and recombinant TRV2 Agrobacterium suspensions prior to infiltration [46] [47].

Plant Material Preparation and Agroinfiltration

The developmental stage and physiological condition of plant materials significantly influence VIGS efficiency. Optimization is required for each species and tissue type.

• Plant Growth: Grow plants under controlled environmental conditions. For Arabidopsis, Nicotiana benthamiana, and many crop species, maintain at 22-24°C with 16-hour light/8-hour dark photoperiod [46] [49].

• Material Selection:

  • For herbaceous species: Use fully expanded young leaves [49]
  • For germinated seeds: Select those with radicle lengths of 1-3 cm [46]
  • For tree species: Utilize young seedlings or specific tissues like Camellia capsules at early developmental stages [47] [48]

• Infiltration Methods:

  • Syringe Infiltration: Gently press a 1-mL needleless syringe against the abaxial leaf surface while supporting the opposite side. Infiltrate multiple sites per leaf for comprehensive coverage [49].
  • Vacuum Infiltration: Submerge plant tissues in Agrobacterium suspension and apply vacuum (0.5 kPa for 5-10 minutes). This method significantly enhances efficiency in recalcitrant tissues [46].
  • Immersion Techniques: For small tissues or germinated seeds, immerse directly in Agrobacterium suspension for 20-40 minutes with gentle shaking [26] [46].

• Post-Inoculation Care: Maintain infiltrated plants under high humidity conditions for 24-48 hours. Subsequently, transfer to normal growth conditions and monitor for silencing phenotypes, which typically appear 2-4 weeks post-infiltration [46] [48].

Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Essential Reagents for VIGS Experiments

Reagent/Category	Specific Examples	Function & Application	Optimization Tips
Viral Vectors	pTRV1, pTRV2 [39] [46]	TRV-based binary vector system	pTRV2 contains MCS for target insertion [39]
Agrobacterium Strains	GV3101, EHA105 [49] [46]	Delivery of viral vectors	EHA105 highest efficiency in strawberry [49]
Infiltration Buffers	MES, MgCl₂, Acetosyringone [46]	Vir gene induction & delivery	200μM acetosyringone critical [46]
Surfactants	Silwet-77 [46]	Enhanced tissue penetration	0.03% optimal concentration [46]
Selection Antibiotics	Kanamycin, Rifampicin [46]	Bacterial selection	50mg/L each for GV3101 [46]
Visual Markers	GFP, GUS [49] [47]	Transformation efficiency monitoring	GFP enables non-destructive tracking [47]

Validation and Troubleshooting

Efficiency Assessment

Comprehensive validation of silencing efficiency requires both phenotypic and molecular analyses:

• Visual Marker Monitoring: When using reporter genes like phytoene desaturase (PDS), successful silencing produces characteristic photobleaching phenotypes appearing 2-3 weeks post-infiltration [46] [48]. For GFP-marked vectors, fluorescence microscopy enables direct visualization of transformation efficiency [47].

• Molecular Validation: Quantify target gene expression using qRT-PCR. Specific primers should amplify regions outside the silenced fragment to avoid detecting residual viral transcripts. Effective silencing typically achieves 40-80% reduction in target transcript abundance [46] [48].

• Protein-Level Analysis: For NBS genes involved in disease resistance, validate functional knockdown through pathogen sensitivity assays. For example, silencing of resistance genes like GmRpp6907 in soybean or GaNBS in cotton enhances susceptibility to corresponding pathogens [26] [2].

Troubleshooting Common Issues

• Low Silencing Efficiency: Optimize Agrobacterium density (OD600), increase acetosyringone concentration, extend incubation time, or switch infiltration methods (e.g., vacuum infiltration) [46].
• Limited Systemic Spread: Ensure proper ratio and viability of TRV1 and TRV2 cultures; verify plant developmental stage suitability [48].
• Non-Specific Phenotypes: Include empty vector controls (TRV1+TRV2:0) to distinguish virus-induced symptoms from specific silencing effects [46].
• Transient Silencing Duration: For extended experiments, consider re-inoculation or use of alternative viral vectors with longer persistence [39].

Applications in NBS Gene Validation

The integration of VIGS into functional studies of NBS domain genes has accelerated the identification and characterization of resistance genes across numerous plant species. In cotton, silencing of GaNBS (orthogroup OG2) through VIGS demonstrated its critical role in resistance to cotton leaf curl disease, establishing a direct link between this NBS gene and antiviral defense [2]. Similarly, VIGS-mediated knockdown of the flax LuWRKY39 gene—which interacts with NBS-mediated signaling pathways—enhanced susceptibility to Septoria linicola, confirming its importance in disease resistance [23]. These applications underscore the power of VIGS for rapid functional validation of candidate resistance genes identified through genomic studies.

The experimental workflow below outlines the complete process from gene identification to functional validation:

Figure 2: NBS Gene Functional Validation Workflow. The process integrates VIGS with phenotypic screening and molecular analyses to establish gene function in disease resistance pathways.

The TRV-based VIGS protocol detailed herein provides researchers with a robust, efficient methodology for functional characterization of NBS genes and other plant genes of interest. By enabling rapid gene silencing without stable transformation, this approach significantly accelerates the validation of candidate genes identified through genomic studies. The systematic optimization of parameters—from fragment design to infiltration methods—ensures reproducible results across diverse plant systems. As plant functional genomics continues to advance, VIGS remains an indispensable tool for bridging the gap between gene sequence information and biological function, particularly for species recalcitrant to conventional transformation. The integration of VIGS with emerging technologies like CRISPR/Cas9 and multi-omics approaches promises to further enhance our understanding of plant immunity mechanisms and facilitate the development of disease-resistant crops.

Functional validation of nucleotide-binding site-leucine rich repeat (NBS-LRR) genes is crucial for understanding plant disease resistance mechanisms. Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) has emerged as a powerful reverse genetics tool for this purpose, enabling rapid assessment of gene function without stable transformation. The efficacy of VIGS experiments depends critically on the delivery method employed to introduce viral vectors into plant tissues. This guide objectively compares three prominent delivery techniques—cotyledon node immersion, pericarp injection, and vacuum infiltration—within the context of functional validation of plant NBS genes, providing supporting experimental data to inform methodological selection.

Technical Comparison of Delivery Methods

The optimal VIGS delivery method varies depending on plant species, target tissue, and experimental objectives. Below, we compare the mechanisms, applications, and performance metrics of three established techniques.

Table 1: Comparative Overview of VIGS Delivery Methods

Delivery Method	Mechanism of Action	Optimal Plant Stage	Primary Applications	Silencing Onset	Key Advantages
Cotyledon Node Immersion	Explants immersed in Agrobacterium suspension for 20-30 minutes enabling bacterial entry through wounded tissues	5-7 day old seedlings; cotyledon stage	Systemic silencing; soybean, medicinal plants	21-25 days post-inoculation	High efficiency (65-95%); applicable to difficult-to-transform species
Vacuum Infiltration	Pressure differential forces Agrobacterium into intercellular spaces through stomata	5-day old etiolated seedlings; young plantlets	Cotyledon-based silencing; Catharanthus roseus, Glycyrrhiza inflata, Artemisia annua	6 days post-infiltration	Rapid silencing phenotype; high efficiency (84.4%); suitable for medicinal plants
Pericarp Injection	Direct injection of Agrobacterium suspension into fruit pericarp using needle-free syringe	Fruit development stages	Fruit-specific studies; tomato, pepper	Varies by species	Tissue-specific silencing; minimizes whole-plant effects

Table 2: Performance Metrics Based on Experimental Data

Delivery Method	Silencing Efficiency	Experimental Duration	Key Demonstrated Outcomes	Successful Applications in Literature
Cotyledon Node Immersion	65-95% (soybean)	3-4 weeks	Photobleaching in leaves; reduced GmRpp6907 and GmRPT4 expression	Soybean (Glycine max) functional genomics [26]
Vacuum Infiltration	84.4% (catmint)	3 weeks	Yellow cotyledons; decreased ChlH expression and chlorophyll content	Nepeta cataria, Catharanthus roseus, Artemisia annua [50] [51]
Pericarp Injection	Not quantified in results	Not specified	Limited to fruit tissues; variable systemic spread	Solanaceous species (referenced generally)

Detailed Methodological Protocols

Cotyledon Node Immersion

The cotyledon node immersion method has been optimized for soybean and other difficult-to-transform species:

• Plant Material Preparation: Surface-sterilize soybean seeds and germinate on moist filter paper for 5-7 days until cotyledons fully expand [26].

• Agrobacterium Preparation: Transform TRV vectors (pTRV1 and pTRV2 containing target gene fragments) into Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101. Grow overnight in LB medium with appropriate antibiotics (kanamycin and gentamycin, 50 mg/L) at 28°C with shaking at 220 rpm [50] [26].

• Bacterial Culture Processing: Centrifuge bacterial cultures and resuspend in infiltration medium (10 mM MES, 10 mM MgClâ‚‚, 200 μM acetosyringone) to OD₆₀₀ = 1.0 [50] [26].

• Immersion Procedure: Bisect swollen soybeans longitudinally to obtain half-seed explants. Immerse fresh explants in Agrobacterium suspension for 20-30 minutes with gentle agitation [26].

• Post-inoculation Care: Transfer infected explants to tissue culture media and maintain at 19-22°C with 16/8-h light/dark cycle for 3-4 weeks [26].

This method achieved 80-95% infection efficiency in soybean cultivar Tianlong 1, with fluorescence microscopy confirming successful transformation [26].

Vacuum Infiltration

The cotyledon-based vacuum infiltration protocol offers rapid, high-efficiency silencing:

• Plant Material Preparation: Germinate seeds (Catharanthus roseus, Nepeta cataria) in dark conditions for five days until cotyledons fully emerge [51] [52].

• Agrobacterium Preparation: Transform TRV vectors into A. tumefaciens GV3101 and culture as described above. Resuspend to OD₆₀₀ = 1.0 in infiltration medium [50] [51].

• Vacuum Infiltration: Submerge etiolated seedlings in Agrobacterium suspension in a vacuum chamber. Apply vacuum (100-250 mbar) for 30 minutes, then slowly release to allow bacterial entry through stomata [51].

• Post-infiltration Care: Maintain infiltrated seedlings in dark for 3 additional days, then transfer to light conditions (16/8-h photoperiod) at 22-25°C [51].

This method achieved 84.4% VIGS efficiency in Nepeta cataria with silencing phenotypes observable within 6 days post-infiltration [50].

Pericarp Injection

While less commonly documented in recent literature, pericarp injection remains valuable for fruit-specific studies:

• Plant Material Selection: Identify plants at appropriate fruit development stage (varies by species).

• Agrobacterium Preparation: Prepare Agrobacterium cultures as described above, adjusting density to OD₆₀₀ = 0.5-1.0.

• Injection Procedure: Using a needle-free syringe, gently press against fruit pericarp and slowly inject 50-100 μL Agrobacterium suspension into pericarp tissue.

• Post-injection Monitoring: Monitor fruits for silencing phenotypes while maintaining plants under standard growth conditions.

Application Workflow for NBS Gene Validation

The following diagram illustrates the decision pathway for selecting and implementing the optimal VIGS delivery method for NBS gene functional analysis:

Essential Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Key Research Reagents for VIGS Experiments

Reagent/Vector	Specifications	Function in VIGS	Example Applications
Tobacco Rattle Virus (TRV) Vectors	Bipartite system: TRV1 (replicase components), TRV2 (coat protein + MCS for target insert)	Viral backbone for silencing construct delivery; wide host range	Soybean, tomato, tobacco, medicinal plants [50] [26] [53]
Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101	Disarmed strain with Ti plasmid; kanamycin and gentamycin resistance	Delivery vehicle for TRV vectors; T-DNA integration	Effective for cotyledon node immersion and vacuum infiltration [50] [51] [26]
Visual Marker Genes	ChlH (Mg-chelatase subunit H), PDS (phytoene desaturase)	Silencing produces visible phenotype (yellow/bleached tissues); validates system efficiency	Nepeta cataria, Catharanthus roseus, soybean [50] [51] [26]
Infiltration Medium	10 mM MES, 10 mM MgCl₂, 200 μM acetosyringone	Enhances Agrobacterium virulence gene expression; improves transformation	All infiltration-based methods [50] [26]
NBS Gene Fragments	200-400 bp from coding sequence; designed to avoid off-target effects	Specific silencing of target NBS-LRR genes; functional assessment	Disease resistance validation [50] [26] [3]

Selecting the optimal VIGS delivery method is critical for successful functional validation of NBS genes. Cotyledon node immersion offers high efficiency for transformable species like soybean, while vacuum infiltration provides rapid results for medicinal plants and species with accessible cotyledons. Pericarp injection remains valuable for fruit-specific studies. Researchers should consider their target species, available facilities, and experimental timeline when selecting a delivery method. The continued optimization of these techniques will further accelerate functional genomics research in plant disease resistance.

Virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) has emerged as a powerful reverse genetics tool for rapid functional analysis of genes in plants that are recalcitrant to stable transformation, such as soybean [26] [54]. This technology is particularly valuable for investigating nucleotide-binding site (NBS) domain genes, which constitute one of the largest superfamilies of plant resistance genes involved in pathogen responses [2]. However, a significant challenge in VIGS experiments lies in confirming that the observed phenotypes result from specific gene silencing rather than experimental variability or viral infection symptoms.

The use of visual reporter genes addresses this critical validation need. Among these, phytoene desaturase (GmPDS) has become the gold standard control for confirming successful gene silencing in soybean VIGS systems [26] [55] [47]. Silencing PDS disrupts carotenoid biosynthesis, leading to characteristic photobleaching that provides unambiguous visual confirmation of successful silencing initiation and spatial distribution throughout the plant. This article provides a comprehensive comparison of GmPDS implementation across VIGS platforms and its critical role in validating functional studies of plant NBS disease resistance genes.

GmPDS as a Benchmark Silencing Reporter

Biological Mechanism and Visual Output

The photobleaching phenotype resulting from GmPDS silencing occurs through a well-characterized biochemical pathway. Phytoene desaturase catalyzes a critical step in carotenoid biosynthesis, and its suppression leads to the accumulation of photobleaching precursors and the degradation of chlorophyll in illuminated tissues [26]. This creates a striking visual phenotype that cannot be confused with natural plant variegation or viral infection symptoms.

The table below summarizes key characteristics of GmPDS as a visual reporter in VIGS experiments:

Table 1: Characteristics of GmPDS as a Silencing Reporter

Characteristic	Description	Experimental Utility
Visual Phenotype	Photobleaching (white or yellow sectors)	Easy detection without specialized equipment
Onset Timing	21 days post-inoculation (dpi) in soybean [26]	Provides temporal reference for target gene silencing
Persistence	Throughout plant development	Allows tracking over time
Tissue Specificity	Systemic spread, visible in new growth	Confirms vascular movement of silencing signals
Phenotype Reversibility	Non-reversible in affected tissues	Permanent record of silencing efficacy

Comparative Performance Across VIGS Systems

GmPDS has been successfully implemented in multiple VIGS platforms, each with distinct efficiencies and applications. Recent studies have quantitatively compared its performance as a benchmark for system optimization:

Table 2: GmPDS Silencing Efficiency Across VIGS Platforms

VIGS Vector System	Host Species	Delivery Method	Silencing Efficiency	Key Advantages
TRV-based [26]	Soybean (Tianlong 1)	Agrobacterium-mediated (cotyledon node)	65-95%	High efficiency, minimal viral symptoms
CPSMV-based (FZ vector) [54]	Soybean, Nicotiana benthamiana, Cowpea	Agrobacterium infiltration or mechanical inoculation	Robust silencing reported	Broad host range, convenient propagation
TRV-based [47]	Camellia drupifera	Pericarp cutting immersion	~69.80%	Optimized for recalcitrant woody tissues
BPMV-based [54]	Soybean	Particle bombardment	Established efficiency	Historical standard for soybean

The tobacco rattle virus (TRV)-based system has demonstrated particularly high efficiency in soybean, with silencing efficiencies reaching up to 95% in the cultivar Tianlong 1 [26]. The optimization of delivery methods, particularly Agrobacterium-mediated infection through cotyledon nodes, has significantly improved reliability compared to conventional misting or injection techniques that struggle with soybean's thick cuticle and dense trichomes.

Experimental Protocols for GmPDS Implementation

Vector Construction and GmPDS Fragment Cloning

The foundational step in employing GmPDS as a silencing reporter involves the molecular cloning of a GmPDS-specific fragment into appropriate VIGS vectors:

• Fragment Selection: A 200-300 bp fragment of the GmPDS coding sequence is amplified using gene-specific primers. For the TRV system, researchers have successfully used primers PDS-F (5'-taaggttaccGAATTCTCTCCGCGTCCTCTAAAAC-3') and PDS-R (5'-atgcccgggcCTCGAGTCCAGGCTTATTTGGCATAGC-3') [26].

• Vector Assembly: The PCR-amplified GmPDS fragment is ligated into the VIGS vector (e.g., pTRV2-GFP) using appropriate restriction sites (commonly EcoRI and XhoI). The ligation product is transformed into DH5α competent cells, and positive clones are verified by sequencing [26].

• Agrobacterium Transformation: Verified recombinant plasmids are introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 for plant delivery.

Plant Inoculation and Phenotype Monitoring

The optimized protocol for soybean VIGS using the TRV system involves:

• Plant Material Preparation: Surface-sterilized soybean seeds are soaked in sterile water until swollen, then longitudinally bisected to obtain half-seed explants [26].

• Agrobacterial Infection: Fresh explants are immersed in Agrobacterium suspensions containing either pTRV1 or pTRV2-GFP derivatives (pTRV:empty or pTRV:GmPDS) for 20-30 minutes [26].

• Efficiency Validation: At 4 days post-infection, a portion of the hypocotyl is excised and observed under a fluorescence microscope to confirm successful infection via GFP signals [26].

• Phenotype Monitoring: Photobleaching typically appears in leaves inoculated with pTRV:GmPDS at 21 days post-inoculation (dpi), initially manifesting in cluster buds before spreading systemically [26].

Diagram 1: GmPDS Validation Workflow for VIGS Experiments

Application in NBS Disease Resistance Gene Research

Validation of NBS Gene Silencing in Disease Resistance Studies

The implementation of GmPDS as a visual control has been particularly crucial in functional studies of NBS domain genes, which are central to plant immunity mechanisms. In the context of cotton leaf curl disease (CLCuD), expression profiling has revealed the putative upregulation of specific orthogroups (OG2, OG6, and OG15) in different tissues under various biotic and abiotic stresses [2]. The critical validation step involved silencing GaNBS (OG2) in resistant cotton through VIGS, which demonstrated its putative role in virus tittering [2].

This approach exemplifies how GmPDS-controlled VIGS experiments can directly link specific NBS genes to disease resistance mechanisms. The photobleaching control provides confidence that observed changes in disease susceptibility result from targeted gene silencing rather than system artifacts.

Integration with Molecular Analyses

Beyond visual confirmation, robust VIGS experiments incorporating GmPDS controls typically include molecular validation:

• qRT-PCR Analysis: Quantifying transcript levels of both GmPDS and target genes to correlate visual phenotypes with molecular silencing efficiency [26] [9].

• Phenotypic Documentation: Systematic recording of photobleaching progression and its correlation with functional phenotypes in target gene silencing.

• Statistical Correlation: Establishing quantitative relationships between GmPDS silencing efficiency and target gene silencing to validate the experimental system.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 3: Key Research Reagents for GmPDS VIGS Experiments

Reagent/Resource	Function/Purpose	Example Sources/References
pTRV1 and pTRV2 vectors	TRV-based VIGS system components	[26] [47]
GmPDS reference sequence	Primer design and fragment amplification	Soybase.org, Phytozome
Restriction enzymes (EcoRI, XhoI)	Vector construction and fragment cloning	Commercial suppliers
Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101	Plant transformation delivery	[26] [47]
Soybean cultivars	Optimization for specific genotypes	Tianlong 1, Williams 82 [26] [55]
Infiltration medium	Agrobacterium delivery solution	10 mM MES pH 5.6, 10 mM MgClâ‚‚ [55]
2-Chloroanthracene-13C6	2-Chloroanthracene-13C6, MF:C14H9Cl, MW:218.63 g/mol	Chemical Reagent
Ethyl Chrysanthemate-D6	Ethyl Chrysanthemate-D6, MF:C10H16O2, MW:174.27 g/mol	Chemical Reagent

Diagram 2: Molecular Mechanism of GmPDS Silencing in VIGS

Comparative Data Interpretation and Troubleshooting

Efficiency Benchmarks and Quality Control

When implementing GmPDS as a silencing reporter, researchers should establish the following quality control benchmarks:

• Efficiency Thresholds: Silencing efficiencies below 65% in the TRV system may indicate suboptimal conditions requiring protocol adjustment [26].

• Temporal Expectations: Photobleaching should initiate within 14-21 days post-inoculation; delayed onset suggests delivery optimization is needed [26].

• Spatial Distribution: Patchy or limited silencing patterns indicate issues with viral spread, potentially related to inoculation method or plant growth conditions.

Technical Considerations and Limitations

Despite its utility, researchers must acknowledge certain limitations when using GmPDS:

• Phenotype Strength Variation: Efficiency varies between plant genotypes and growth conditions, requiring system optimization for each new cultivar [26] [55].

• Viral Symptom Interference: Some VIGS vectors may cause mild viral symptoms that should not be confused with silencing phenotypes.

• Environmental Sensitivity: Photobleaching requires adequate light intensity; low-light conditions may reduce phenotype visibility.

GmPDS remains an indispensable visual reporter system for validating VIGS experiments in plant functional genomics, particularly for challenging systems like NBS disease resistance gene studies. The quantitative data presented herein establishes clear performance benchmarks across platforms, with TRV-based systems achieving up to 95% silencing efficiency in optimized conditions [26]. The standardized protocols and controls described provide a critical foundation for rigorous reverse genetic analysis of plant immunity mechanisms.

As VIGS technology continues to evolve toward higher efficiency and broader host range [54] [47], the role of robust visual controls like GmPDS becomes increasingly important for generating reliable functional data. This comparative guide provides researchers with the essential framework for implementing these critical control experiments in their investigation of plant NBS genes and disease resistance mechanisms.

Functional validation of disease resistance genes is a critical step in molecular plant breeding, enabling the development of cultivars with enhanced and durable resistance to devastating pathogens. Among various gene function validation tools, Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) has emerged as a powerful reverse genetics approach for rapid assessment of gene function in plants. This method is particularly valuable for analyzing nucleotide-binding site (NBS) domain genes, which constitute one of the largest superfamilies of plant resistance genes involved in pathogen recognition and defense activation [2]. The NBS domain forms the core of nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat (NLR) proteins, which function as major immune receptors for effector-triggered immunity (ETI) in plants [2]. This review showcases the application of VIGS for validating disease resistance genes in three economically significant crops—soybean, cotton, and flax—highlighting experimental protocols, key findings, and innovative adaptations of this technology.

VIGS Methodology for Disease Resistance Validation

Core Principles and Workflow of VIGS

Virus-Induced Gene Silencing is a form of post-transcriptional gene silencing that utilizes recombinant viral vectors to trigger sequence-specific degradation of target endogenous mRNAs. The fundamental VIGS workflow involves several key steps: (1) cloning a fragment of the target gene into a viral vector, (2) introducing the recombinant vector into plants via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation or in vitro transcription, (3) systemic spread of the recombinant virus throughout the plant, and (4) activation of the plant's RNA silencing machinery, leading to degradation of both viral and homologous endogenous transcripts [26]. This process results in a loss-of-function phenotype that allows researchers to assess the biological function of the targeted gene, particularly in defense responses.

The tobacco rattle virus (TRV)-based VIGS system has gained widespread adoption due to its ability to infect a broad range of host plants, induce relatively mild viral symptoms, and achieve efficient silencing with substantial systemic spread [26]. Compared to stable genetic transformation, VIGS offers significant advantages including rapid implementation, applicability across diverse genetic backgrounds, and the ability to test genes that might be lethal when constitutively silenced.

Standardized VIGS Experimental Protocol

The following protocol represents a generalized VIGS procedure adapted for disease resistance validation, with crop-specific modifications detailed in subsequent sections:

• Vector Construction: Amplify a 300-500 bp fragment of the target gene using gene-specific primers incorporating appropriate restriction sites. Ligate the fragment into the pTRV2 vector (or similar VIGS vector) and verify the construct through sequencing [26].

• Agrobacterium Preparation: Introduce the recombinant pTRV2 construct and the helper pTRV1 vector into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101. Grow individual colonies in 2-5 mL of LB medium with appropriate antibiotics at 28°C for 24 hours with shaking at 200 rpm [26] [56].

• Culture Scaling and Induction: Inoculate 50 mL of LB medium with the starter culture and grow to OD600 = 1.0-1.5. Pellet cells by centrifugation at 3,000 × g for 15 minutes and resuspend in induction medium (10 mM MES, 10 mM MgCl2, 200 μM acetosyringone) to OD600 = 1.0. Incubate the suspension at room temperature for 3-6 hours with gentle agitation [26].

• Plant Inoculation: Mix the pTRV1 and pTRV2-recombinant Agrobacterium suspensions in a 1:1 ratio. For soybean and cotton, the cotyledon node infiltration method is highly effective, while flax may require vacuum infiltration or direct injection approaches [26] [56] [23].

• Silencing Validation: Maintain inoculated plants under appropriate environmental conditions (22-25°C, 16-h light/8-h dark photoperiod) for 2-3 weeks. Monitor silencing efficiency through phenotypic observation (if targeting a visual marker like PDS), quantitative RT-PCR assessment of target gene expression, and/or protein analysis [26] [23].

• Pathogen Challenge and Resistance Assessment: Inoculate silenced plants with the target pathogen using appropriate infection methods (e.g., spore suspension spraying, root dipping, etc.). Evaluate disease symptoms using standardized scoring systems and quantify pathogen biomass through cultural or molecular methods [56] [23].

The following diagram illustrates the generalized VIGS workflow for functional validation of disease resistance genes:

VIGS Application in Soybean

TRV-Based VIGS System for Soybean Functional Genomics

Soybean presents particular challenges for genetic studies due to the difficulties associated with stable genetic transformation. While several viral vectors have been developed for VIGS in soybean, including bean pod mottle virus (BPMV) and apple latent spherical virus (ALSV), the tobacco rattle virus (TRV)-based system has recently been optimized for more efficient application [26]. This optimized protocol utilizes Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated infection through the cotyledon node, enabling systemic viral spread and effective silencing of endogenous genes throughout the plant [26].

The TRV-VIGS system has demonstrated remarkable efficiency in soybean, with silencing efficacy ranging from 65% to 95% across different target genes [26]. Key genes involved in soybean disease resistance have been successfully silenced using this approach, including:

• GmPDS: The phytoene desaturase gene, serving as a visual marker for silencing efficiency through photobleaching
• GmRpp6907: A rust resistance gene providing resistance against Asian soybean rust (Phakopsora pachyrhizi)
• GmRPT4: A defense-related gene implicated in proteasomal regulation of defense responses [26]

Validation of NBS-Mediated Resistance to Asian Soybean Rust

Asian Soybean Rust (ASR), caused by Phakopsora pachyrhizi, represents one of the most destructive diseases affecting global soybean production [57]. Genetic resistance to ASR is primarily governed by Rpp (Resistance to P. pachyrhizi) genes, most of which encode NBS-LRR type proteins [57]. VIGS has played a crucial role in validating the function of these Rpp genes and understanding their mechanisms of action.

For instance, silencing of Rpp1 via BPMV-VIGS compromised soybean rust immunity, confirming its essential role in pathogen recognition and defense activation [26]. Similarly, the Rpp6907 gene was successfully silenced using the TRV-VIGS system, resulting in increased susceptibility to rust infection [26]. These validations are particularly significant for resistance breeding programs, as pyramiding multiple Rpp genes through marker-assisted selection represents the most promising strategy for developing durable ASR resistance [57].

Table 1: Validated Soybean Disease Resistance Genes Using VIGS

Target Gene	Pathogen/Disease	VIGS System	Silencing Efficiency	Key Findings	Reference
GmRpp6907	Asian soybean rust (Phakopsora pachyrhizi)	TRV-VIGS	65-95%	Increased susceptibility to rust infection	[26]
Rpp1	Asian soybean rust (Phakopsora pachyrhizi)	BPMV-VIGS	Not specified	Compromised soybean rust immunity	[26]
GmRPT4	Defense response regulation	TRV-VIGS	65-95%	Altered defense signaling	[26]
GmBIR1	Soybean mosaic virus (SMV)	BPMV-VIGS	Not specified	Enhanced resistance to SMV, constitutively activated defense	[26]
Rsc1-DR	Soybean mosaic virus strain SC1 (SMV-SC1)	BPMV-VIGS	Not specified	Confirmed resistance to SMV-SC1	[26]

VIGS Application in Cotton

Elucidating Verticillium Wilt Resistance Mechanisms

Verticillium wilt (VW), caused by the soil-borne fungus Verticillium dahliae, poses a significant threat to cotton production worldwide [56]. The disease is particularly challenging to manage due to the long-term persistence of fungal microsclerotia in soil and the limited availability of resistant cultivars. VIGS has emerged as an invaluable tool for identifying and validating cotton genes involved in VW resistance, particularly those regulating lignification of cell walls—a critical physical barrier against pathogen invasion [56].

A recent breakthrough application of VIGS in cotton involved the functional characterization of GhLAC14-3, a laccase gene significantly upregulated during early V. dahliae infection [56]. Silencing of GhLAC14-3 in cotton via VIGS resulted in:

• Increased disease susceptibility to V. dahliae
• Reduced lignin deposition in vascular tissues
• Downregulation of lignin-related genes in the phenylpropanoid pathway [56]

Complementary studies showed that overexpression of GhLAC14-3 in transgenic Arabidopsis increased lignin content and enhanced VW resistance, confirming its crucial role in defense-induced lignification [56].

Identification of NBS Genes in Cotton Leaf Curl Disease Resistance

Cotton leaf curl disease (CLCuD), caused by begomoviruses from the Geminiviridae family, has devastated cotton production in South Asia, particularly Pakistan [2]. Genetic studies have revealed that Gossypium arboreum ("desi cotton") exhibits high resistance to CLCuD, while certain G. hirsutum accessions like Mac7 show tolerance, and others like Coker-312 display high susceptibility [2]. This natural variation provides a valuable resource for identifying resistance genes.

A comprehensive analysis of NBS-domain-containing genes across 34 plant species identified 12,820 such genes, with several exhibiting differential expression in response to CLCuD infection [2]. Expression profiling revealed putative upregulation of specific orthogroups (OG2, OG6, and OG15) in different tissues under various biotic stresses in both susceptible and CLCuD-tolerant cotton accessions [2]. The application of VIGS to silence GaNBS (OG2) in resistant cotton demonstrated its role in reducing viral titer, validating its function in CLCuD resistance [2].

Table 2: Validated Cotton Disease Resistance Genes Using VIGS

Target Gene	Pathogen/Disease	VIGS System	Key Findings	Molecular Function	Reference
GhLAC14-3	Verticillium wilt (Verticillium dahliae)	TRV-VIGS	Increased susceptibility, reduced lignin deposition	Laccase involved in lignin polymerization	[56]
GaNBS (OG2)	Cotton leaf curl disease (Begomovirus)	VIGS (specific system not stated)	Increased viral titer, reduced resistance	NBS-LRR type resistance protein	[2]
GhLAC1	Verticillium wilt (Verticillium dahliae)	Not specified	Enhanced lignification and resistance	Laccase involved in lignin biosynthesis	[56]
GhLAC15	Verticillium wilt (Verticillium dahliae)	Not specified	Increased lignin content and altered S/G ratio	Laccase involved in lignin biosynthesis	[56]

VIGS Application in Flax

Combatting Pasmo Disease Through WRKY Transcription Factor Validation

Flax production faces significant challenges from various fungal diseases, with pasmo disease caused by Septoria linicola emerging as a particularly destructive threat capable of reducing stem yields by up to 50% in severe cases [23]. Recent surveys in Chinese flax-growing regions have reported disease incidence rates of 10-30%, with severe outbreaks affecting over 80% of plants in certain areas [23]. Traditional breeding for pasmo resistance has progressed slowly, necessitating the identification and validation of resistance genes through molecular approaches.

VIGS has proven instrumental in validating the function of LuWRKY39, a WRKY transcription factor gene identified as a key regulator of flax resistance to S. linicola [23]. The functional validation process involved:

• Gene Cloning and Characterization: Isolation of a 948 bp cDNA fragment of LuWRKY39 from resistant flax material, with phylogenetic analysis revealing closest relationship to WRKY in castor
• Expression Profiling: qRT-PCR analysis demonstrating higher LuWRKY39 expression in resistant versus susceptible materials, with predominant expression in roots and stems
• Hormonal Response Analysis: Induction of LuWRKY39 expression following treatment with salicylic acid (SA) and methyl jasmonate (MeJA), indicating involvement in SA and JA signaling pathways
• Functional Validation: VIGS-mediated silencing of LuWRKY39 resulting in enhanced susceptibility to S. linicola, confirmed through disease index statistics and expression analysis [23]

Leveraging Flax Genetic Diversity for Resistance Breeding

The successful application of VIGS for gene validation in flax is complemented by ongoing efforts to characterize and utilize the crop's genetic diversity. A worldwide flax collection comprising 1,593 accessions originating from 42 countries has revealed pronounced genetic structure influenced by cultivation purpose (fiber vs. oilseed), growth cycle (winter vs. spring), and geographic origin [58]. Oilseed flax clusters display greater genetic diversity (He = 0.21-0.27) than fiber flax (He < 0.17), providing valuable resources for resistance gene discovery [58].

Optimized core collections representing this diversity while maintaining genetic representativeness serve as valuable resources for genome-wide association studies (GWAS) aimed at identifying resistance loci [58]. The integration of VIGS-based functional validation with diversity analysis and association mapping creates a powerful framework for accelerating the development of disease-resistant flax cultivars.

Comparative Analysis of VIGS Applications

Cross-Crop Evaluation of VIGS Efficacy and Limitations

The application of VIGS for validating disease resistance genes across soybean, cotton, and flax reveals both shared principles and crop-specific adaptations. The following table provides a comparative analysis of VIGS implementation across these three crop systems:

Table 3: Comparative Analysis of VIGS Applications in Soybean, Cotton, and Flax

Parameter	Soybean	Cotton	Flax
Primary VIGS System	TRV, BPMV	TRV	TRV, BSMV
Delivery Method	Cotyledon node Agrobacterium infiltration	Cotyledon node Agrobacterium infiltration, leaf infiltration	Spraying, vacuum infiltration
Silencing Efficiency	65-95%	Not specifically quantified	Not specifically quantified
Key Validated Resistance Genes	GmRpp6907 (rust), Rpp1 (rust), GmRPT4 (defense)	GhLAC14-3 (VW), GaNBS (CLCuD), GhLAC1/15 (VW)	LuWRKY39 (pasmo)
Primary Pathogens Targeted	Phakopsora pachyrhizi (rust), soybean mosaic virus	Verticillium dahliae (VW), begomoviruses (CLCuD)	Septoria linicola (pasmo)
Key Resistance Mechanisms	NBS-LRR mediated immunity, defense signaling	Lignification, NBS-LRR immunity	WRKY-mediated defense regulation, SA/JA signaling
Typical Validation Timeline	3-4 weeks	3-4 weeks	2-3 weeks
Technical Challenges	Thick cuticle and dense trichomes reduce infiltration efficiency	Similar to soybean, requires optimized infiltration methods	Less established protocols, requires optimization

Integration with Modern Breeding Approaches

The validation of disease resistance genes through VIGS provides crucial functional information that directly informs and accelerates molecular breeding programs. Several strategic applications emerge from the case studies presented:

• Gene Pyramiding: VIGS-validated Rpp genes in soybean can be pyramided through marker-assisted selection to develop durable resistance to Asian soybean rust [57]. Cultivars carrying multiple Rpp genes demonstrate enhanced, broad-spectrum, and more durable resistance compared to single-gene varieties [57].

• Marker Development: Functionally validated genes enable the development of precise molecular markers for efficient selection of resistant genotypes without the need for pathogen challenge.

• Transgenic Approaches: Validated resistance genes like GhLAC14-3 in cotton represent potential candidates for genetic engineering approaches to enhance disease resistance in susceptible elite cultivars.

• Core Collection Screening: Functionally characterized genes facilitate targeted screening of core collections to identify novel resistance alleles and haplotypes for breeding [58].

The following diagram illustrates the integration of VIGS validation within a comprehensive resistance breeding pipeline:

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Solutions

The successful implementation of VIGS for disease resistance validation relies on a suite of specialized research reagents and molecular tools. The following table catalogues essential resources referenced in the showcased studies:

Table 4: Essential Research Reagents for VIGS-Based Disease Resistance Validation

Reagent/Resource	Specification/Example	Primary Function	Application Examples
VIGS Vectors	pTRV1, pTRV2, BPMV vectors	Viral RNA replication and movement, insert hosting	All showcased studies [26] [56] [23]
Agrobacterium Strains	GV3101	Delivery of VIGS constructs into plant cells	Soybean, cotton transformations [26] [56]
Restriction Enzymes	EcoRI, XhoI	Vector construction and gene fragment cloning	Soybean vector construction [26]
Induction Media Components	MES, MgCl2, acetosyringone	Induction of virulence genes in Agrobacterium	All Agrobacterium-mediated transformations
RNA Extraction Kits	RNAplant Plus Reagent	High-quality RNA isolation for silencing validation	Flax gene expression analysis [23]
cDNA Synthesis Kits	Maxima H Minus First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit	cDNA synthesis for qRT-PCR analysis	Flax expression studies [23]
Pathogen Culture Media	PDA, water agar + streptomycin	Pathogen isolation, maintenance, and spore production	Flax pasmo studies [23]
Plant Growth Regulators	Salicylic acid, methyl jasmonate	Defense pathway induction and signaling studies	Flax hormone treatment [23]
Germplasm Collections	Worldwide flax collection (1,593 accessions), soybean mini-core	Genetic diversity analysis and novel allele discovery	Flax diversity studies [58]
BP Light 650 carboxylic acid	BP Light 650 carboxylic acid, MF:C38H50N2O15S4, MW:903.1 g/mol	Chemical Reagent	Bench Chemicals
4-Chlorobenzonitrile-d4	4-Chlorobenzonitrile-d4, MF:C7H4ClN, MW:141.59 g/mol	Chemical Reagent	Bench Chemicals

VIGS has established itself as an indispensable functional genomics tool for validating disease resistance genes in crop species, effectively bridging the gap between gene discovery and applied breeding. The showcased applications in soybean, cotton, and flax demonstrate the versatility of this technology across diverse pathosystems and resistance mechanisms. From validating NBS-LRR genes in soybean rust resistance to characterizing lignification-related laccase genes in cotton Verticillium wilt defense and WRKY transcription factors in flax pasmo resistance, VIGS provides critical functional evidence that directly informs resistance breeding strategies.

The continued refinement of VIGS protocols—including optimized delivery methods, expanded host range compatibility, and enhanced silencing efficiency—will further strengthen its utility in crop improvement programs. When integrated with complementary approaches such as genome-wide association studies, expression analyses, and modern breeding techniques, VIGS-based validation contributes significantly to the development of durable disease resistance and sustainable crop production systems.

Overcoming Challenges: Optimizing VIGS Efficiency in Recalcitrant Species and Tissues

Addressing Low Infection Efficiency in Species with Thick Cuticles or Dense Trichomes

Within the functional validation of plant Nucleotide-Binding Site-Leucine Rich Repeat (NBS-LRR) genes, Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) has emerged as a rapid and powerful tool for reverse genetics. A significant challenge in this field is achieving high infection efficiency in plant species with natural physical barriers, such as thick cuticles or dense trichomes, which impede the delivery of viral vectors. This guide objectively compares optimized VIGS methodologies designed to overcome these barriers, providing supporting experimental data to aid researchers in selecting and implementing the most effective protocols for their work on NBS gene validation.

Method Comparison and Performance Data

The table below summarizes optimized VIGS methods, their applications in recalcitrant species, and key performance metrics.

Table 1: Performance Comparison of Optimized VIGS Methods for Recalcitrant Species

Methodology	Target Species	Key Optimization Parameters	Reported Silencing Efficiency	Primary Advantage
Cotyledon Node Immersion [59] [26]	Soybean (Glycine max) [59] [26]	Agrobacterium OD~600~: 1.5; Immersion for 20-30 min [59] [26]	65% - 95% [59] [26]	Overcomes dense trichomes and thick cuticles; high systemic efficiency [59] [26]
Seed Vacuum Infiltration [60]	Sunflower (Helianthus annuus) [60]	200 μmol·L⁻¹ AS; OD~600~: 0.5; 6h co-cultivation [60]	Up to 91% infection rate [60]	Bypasses epidermal barriers at early developmental stage [60]
Pericarp Cutting Immersion [47]	Tea Oil Camellia (Camellia drupifera) [47]	Infiltration of fresh explants via immersion [47]	~93.94% [47]	Effective for firmly lignified, recalcitrant tissues [47]
Friction Inoculation [61]	Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) [61]	Use of homogenate from pre-infected N. benthamiana with quartz sand [61]	Significant enhancement over controls [61]	Extends silencing to older tissues; useful for reproductive stage studies [61]

Detailed Experimental Protocols

Cotyledon Node Immersion for Soybean

The thick cuticle and dense trichomes of soybean leaves render conventional misting or injection methods ineffective [59] [26]. An optimized protocol using cotyledon node immersion was established as follows [59] [26]:

• Plant Material Preparation: Sterilize soybean seeds and soak in sterile water until swollen. Bisect the seeds longitudinally to obtain half-seed explants, ensuring the cotyledon node is exposed.
• Agrobacterium Preparation: Transform the TRV vectors (pTRV1 and pTRV2 containing the gene fragment of interest) into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101. Grow cultures to an OD~600~ of 0.9-1.0. Centrifuge and resuspend the bacterial pellet in an infiltration medium (10 mM MgClâ‚‚, 10 mM MES, 200 μM acetosyringone) to a final OD~600~ of 1.5.
• Inoculation: Combine the pTRV1 and pTRV2 agrobacterial suspensions in a 1:1 ratio. Immerse the fresh half-seed explants in the mixed suspension for 20-30 minutes, ensuring full contact with the cotyledon node.
• Post-inoculation Culture: After immersion, co-cultivate the explants on tissue culture medium in the dark for 2-3 days before transferring to standard growth conditions.

This method achieved an infection efficiency exceeding 80%, reaching up to 95% for some cultivars, as confirmed by GFP fluorescence observation and subsequent silencing of the GmPDS gene which resulted in clear photobleaching [59] [26].

Seed Vacuum Infiltration for Sunflower

To address the challenges of transforming sunflower, a seed vacuum infiltration protocol was developed, which requires no in vitro recovery [60].

• Plant Material: Sunflower seeds are used. Peeling the seed coats is recommended, but no surface sterilization is required.
• Agrobacterium and Vector: The TRV vectors pYL192 (TRV1) and pYL156 (TRV2) are used. A fragment of the HaPDS gene is cloned into TRV2. The constructs are transformed into A. tumefaciens GV3101.
• Infiltration Suspension: Agrobacterium cultures are prepared and resuspended in infiltration medium to an OD~600~ of 0.5, with the addition of 200 μmol·L⁻¹ acetosyringone.
• Vacuum Infiltration: Submerge the peeled seeds in the agrobacterial suspension. Apply a vacuum for a specified duration, then release rapidly to allow the suspension to infiltrate the seed tissues.
• Co-cultivation: Following infiltration, seeds are co-cultivated for 6 hours before being sown directly in soil.

This protocol achieved an infection percentage of up to 91%, with genotype dependency observed. The TRV virus was detected in leaves up to node 9, indicating systemic spread throughout the plant [60].

Visualizing Protocol Selection and Efficiency Factors

The following diagram illustrates the decision-making workflow for selecting an optimized VIGS method based on plant characteristics and research goals, and highlights key factors influencing silencing efficiency.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

The table below lists key reagents and materials essential for implementing the high-efficiency VIGS protocols described above.

Table 2: Essential Reagents for Optimized VIGS Protocols

Reagent/Material	Function/Application	Examples/Specifications
TRV Vectors	Viral backbone for delivering target gene fragments; bipartite system (TRV1, TRV2) [59] [62]	pTRV1, pTRV2; pYL192 (TRV1), pYL156 (TRV2) [59] [60]
Agrobacterium tumefaciens	Mediates vector delivery into plant cells [59] [63]	Strain GV3101 is widely used [59] [63] [61]
Infiltration Medium	Suspension medium for Agrobacterium; enhances transformation [59] [63]	10 mM MgCl₂, 10 mM MES, 200 μM acetosyringone [59] [63] [61]
Visual Marker Genes	Positive control to monitor silencing efficiency [59] [63] [61]	PDS (photobleaching) [59] [63], GoPGF (gland formation) [61], ChlH (chlorosis) [62]
Antibiotics	Selection for bacterial and plasmid maintenance [59] [47] [60]	Kanamycin, Rifampicin, Gentamicin [59] [47] [60]
7-Hydroxycannabidiol-d10	7-Hydroxycannabidiol-d10, MF:C21H30O3, MW:340.5 g/mol	Chemical Reagent
Sodium formate-13C,d1	Sodium formate-13C,d1, MF:CH2NaO2, MW:71.014 g/mol	Chemical Reagent

The choice of an optimal VIGS protocol is critical for the successful functional validation of NBS genes in recalcitrant plant species. Methodologies such as cotyledon node immersion and seed vacuum infiltration have demonstrated high efficacy by strategically bypassing or overcoming physical barriers like thick cuticles and dense trichomes. Success hinges not only on the delivery method but also on the meticulous optimization of factors including Agrobacterium density, plant genotype, and developmental stage. The experimental data and protocols provided herein offer a robust foundation for researchers to advance studies in plant-pathogen interactions and resistance gene characterization.

Functional validation of plant nucleotide-binding site (NBS) genes, which constitute one of the largest superfamilies of plant resistance genes, is crucial for understanding plant defense mechanisms against pathogens [2]. Virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) has emerged as a powerful reverse genetics tool for characterizing gene function, particularly in species resistant to stable transformation. However, the application of VIGS has been predominantly limited to tender tissues of model plants, leaving a significant gap in methodology for recalcitrant perennial woody plants with firmly lignified structures. Recalcitrant tissues present unique challenges due to their robust cell walls, limited intercellular spaces, and often complex anatomical features that impede efficient viral vector delivery and systemic spread [64] [47].

The recent development of an optimized VIGS system for Camellia drupifera capsules represents a methodological breakthrough that extends functional genomics to previously inaccessible tissue types [64] [47]. This advancement is particularly relevant for NBS gene validation research, as it enables direct functional analysis of defense genes within the context of durable plant structures that often serve as critical physical and chemical barriers against pathogens. The lessons from woody camellia capsules provide a framework for optimizing VIGS protocols that can be adapted to other challenging plant systems, thereby accelerating the functional characterization of NBS genes across diverse species.

Experimental Optimization: A Multifactorial Approach

Systematic Optimization Strategy

The development of an efficient VIGS protocol for C. drupifera capsules employed an orthogonal experimental design examining three critical factors: silencing target selection, virus inoculation approach, and capsule developmental stage [47]. This comprehensive approach identified optimal parameters through rigorous statistical analysis, moving beyond the trial-and-error methodology that often characterizes protocol development.

To facilitate clear observation and quantitative assessment of silencing efficiency, researchers selected two genes with visible phenotypic markers primarily involved in pericarp pigmentation: CdCRY1 (encoding a key photoreceptor affecting light-responsive anthocyanin accumulation in exocarps) and CdLAC15 (encoding an oxidase catalyzing the oxidative polymerization of proanthocyanidins in mesocarps) [47]. This strategic choice of visual markers enabled rapid screening of silencing efficiency without requiring complex molecular analyses for initial assessment.

Comparative Analysis of Inoculation Methods

Four distinct inoculation methods were systematically evaluated for their efficiency in delivering TRV-based vectors into the lignified capsule tissues [47]:

• Peduncle injection: Viral suspension injected directly into the fruit stalk
• Direct pericarp injection: Inoculum delivered through direct injection into the fruit wall
• Pericarp cutting immersion: Tissue sections with minor injuries immersed in Agrobacterium suspension
• Fruit-bearing shoot infusion: Inoculum delivered through the shoot bearing multiple fruits

Quantitative analysis revealed pericarp cutting immersion as the most effective delivery method, achieving approximately 93.94% infiltration efficiency for both target genes [47]. This superior performance is attributed to the method's ability to overcome the physical barrier presented by the thick, lignified pericarp while ensuring sufficient contact between the viral vector and susceptible plant cells.

Developmental Stage Optimization

The research demonstrated that silencing efficiency varies significantly with capsule developmental stage, highlighting the importance of temporal optimization [47]. The optimal VIGS effect for CdCRY1 was observed at early developmental stages (approximately 69.80% efficiency), while CdLAC15 silencing was most effective at mid developmental stages (approximately 90.91% efficiency) [47]. This stage-specific efficiency likely reflects differential gene expression patterns, vascular development, and metabolic activity throughout capsule maturation.

Table 1: Optimization Parameters for VIGS in C. drupifera Capsules

Optimization Factor	Options Tested	Optimal Choice	Efficiency Achieved
Inoculation Method	Peduncle injection, Direct pericarp injection,Pericarp cutting immersion,Fruit-bearing shoot infusion	Pericarp cutting immersion	~93.94% infiltration efficiency
Developmental Stage	Multiple stages from early to late development	Early stage (CdCRY1)Mid stage (CdLAC15)	~69.80% (CdCRY1)~90.91% (CdLAC15)
Silencing Target	CdCRY1, CdLAC15	Both suitable with stage adjustment	Visible pigment phenotypes

Comparative Performance Analysis: Camellia System Versus Other VIGS Applications

Efficiency Metrics Across Plant Systems

The optimized C. drupifera VIGS system demonstrates notable efficiency when compared with other recently developed VIGS protocols for challenging plant tissues. While not all systems achieve the near-perfect efficiency possible in model plants like Nicotiana benthamiana, the camellia capsule protocol represents a significant advancement for woody tissues.

Table 2: Performance Comparison of VIGS Systems in Recalcitrant Tissues

Plant System	Tissue Type	Vector System	Delivery Method	Silencing Efficiency	Key Applications
Camellia drupifera	Lignified capsules	TRV	Pericarp cutting immersion	69.80-90.91% (stage-dependent)	Pigmentation genes (CdCRY1, CdLAC15) [47]
Soybean (Glycine max)	Cotyledon nodes, leaves	TRV	Cotyledon node immersion	65-95%	Disease resistance genes (GmRpp6907, GmRPT4) [26]
Ilex dabieshanensis	Leaves	TRV	Syringe infiltration	Not quantified (visible phenotypes)	Chlorophyll biosynthesis (IdChlH) [65]
Styrax japonicus	Seedlings	TRV	Vacuum infiltration/Friction-osmosis	74.19-83.33%	General gene function validation [66]
Flax (Linum usitatissimum)	Whole plants	TRV	Not specified	Not quantified (confirmed susceptibility)	Disease resistance (LuWRKY39) [23]

Key Advantages of the Camellia Capsule System

The C. drupifera VIGS system offers several distinct advantages for functional genomics research:

• Direct targeting of recalcitrant tissues: Unlike many VIGS protocols that focus on vegetative tissues, this system specifically addresses the challenges of lignified reproductive structures [47].

• High infiltration efficiency: The pericarp cutting immersion method achieves exceptionally high infection rates (~93.94%), overcoming the physical barriers presented by woody tissues [47].

• Visual phenotypic markers: The use of pigment-related genes provides easily scorable phenotypes, enabling rapid assessment of silencing efficiency without destructive sampling [47].

• Developmental stage specificity: The recognition that optimal silencing varies with developmental stage provides a framework for temporal optimization in other species [47].

Methodological Protocols: Detailed Workflows for Recalcitrant Tissue VIGS

Vector Construction and Preparation

The C. drupifera protocol utilizes a modified TRV vector system, specifically pNC-TRV2 (a modified version of pTRV2) and its green fluorescent protein variant, pNC-TRV2-GFP [47]. The construction process involves:

• Target gene fragment selection: Screening for suitable 200-300 bp fragments with high specificity to target genes using the SGN VIGS Tool to minimize off-target effects [47].

• Fragment amplification: PCR amplification using high-fidelity DNA polymerase with specific primers containing appropriate restriction sites for directional cloning [47].

• Vector assembly: Ligation of target fragments into the TRV2 vector using advanced cloning techniques such as Nimble Cloning [47].

• Agrobacterium transformation: Introduction of recombinant plasmids into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 using the freeze-thaw method [47].

Agrobacterium Culture and Inoculum Preparation

Optimal Agrobacterium culture conditions are critical for achieving high infection efficiency:

• Starter culture: Single colonies are inoculated into YEB medium containing appropriate antibiotics (25 μg/mL kanamycin, 50 μg/mL rifampicin) and grown at 28°C with shaking at 200-240 rpm for 24 hours [47].

• Culture expansion: Homogeneous agrobacteria solution is transferred to fresh YEB medium supplemented with 10 mM MES (pH 5.6) and 200 μM acetosyringone, then diluted 1:20 and cultured until OD600 reaches 0.9-1.0 [47].

• Cell harvesting and resuspension: Cultures are centrifuged at 5,000 rpm for 15 minutes, with pellets resuspended in infiltration buffer (10 mM MgClâ‚‚, 10 mM MES, 200 μM acetosyringone, pH 5.6) to optimal density [47].

• Solution mixing: Agrobacterium cultures containing TRV1 and TRV2 constructs are mixed in a 1:1 ratio and incubated at room temperature for 3-4 hours in the dark before infiltration [47].

Plant Material Preparation and Inoculation

The optimized protocol for camellia capsules includes specific handling procedures:

• Capsule selection: Harvesting capsules from 20-year-old trees at precise developmental stages (279 days post-pollination in the published study) [47].

• Pericarp cutting immersion: The most effective method involves creating minor injuries on the capsule surface followed by immersion in the Agrobacterium suspension for optimal infection [47].

• Post-inoculation incubation: Maintaining inoculated plants under controlled environmental conditions (specific temperature, humidity, and photoperiod) to facilitate viral spread and gene silencing [47].

The following workflow diagram illustrates the complete experimental procedure from vector construction to phenotypic analysis:

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Successful implementation of VIGS in recalcitrant tissues requires specific reagents and materials optimized for challenging plant systems:

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents for VIGS in Recalcitrant Tissues

Reagent Category	Specific Products/Components	Function in Protocol	Optimization Notes
Viral Vector System	pNC-TRV2, pNC-TRV2-GFP, pTRV1	RNA virus components for triggering silencing	Modified TRV2 vectors show enhanced efficiency in woody tissues [47]
Agrobacterium Strain	GV3101	Delivery vehicle for viral vectors	Optimal balance of virulence and ease of handling [47]
Induction Compounds	Acetosyringone (200 μM), MES buffer (10 mM, pH 5.6)	Activate Agrobacterium virulence genes	Critical for enhancing infection efficiency in recalcitrant tissues [47]
Culture Media	YEB medium with antibiotics (kanamycin, rifampicin)	Selective growth of transformed Agrobacterium	Maintains plasmid stability while supporting robust growth [47]
Infiltration Buffer	MgCl₂ (10 mM), MES (10 mM), acetosyringone (200 μM)	Resuspension medium for inoculation	Maintains Agrobacterium viability and facilitates plant cell infection [47]
Molecular Biology Kits	RNAprep Pure Kit, Hieff Robust PCR Master Mix, cDNA synthesis kits	Molecular validation of silencing	High-quality reagents essential for accurate qRT-PCR verification [47]

Implications for NBS Gene Functional Validation

The optimization strategies developed for woody camellia capsules have direct relevance for functional validation of NBS domain genes, which represent crucial components of plant immune systems [2]. The NBS gene family exhibits significant diversity across plant species, with both classical and species-specific structural patterns that require functional characterization to understand their roles in pathogen defense [2].

The camellia capsule VIGS system enables researchers to:

• Validate NBS gene function in durable tissues: Many NBS genes are expressed in structural tissues like stems, capsules, and bark, where they contribute to physical defense mechanisms [2].

• Study gene expression in pathogen interaction sites: Recalcitrant tissues often represent important sites of plant-pathogen interactions, making functional validation in these contexts particularly valuable [2] [47].

• Characterize species-specific NBS architectures: The identification of novel domain architecture patterns in NBS genes [2] necessitates functional validation systems that work across diverse tissue types, including woody structures.

• Accelerate functional screening of NBS orthogroups: With 603 orthogroups identified across plant species [2], high-throughput VIGS systems for challenging tissues are essential for comprehensive functional annotation.

The integration of these VIGS optimization strategies with NBS gene research will significantly advance our understanding of plant defense mechanisms and facilitate the development of improved disease resistance in crop plants, particularly for perennial and woody species where conventional genetic transformation remains challenging.

Fine-Tuning Agrobacterium Culture Density and Inoculation Duration

In Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) research for the functional validation of plant NBS (nucleotide-binding site) genes, fine-tuning Agrobacterium culture density and inoculation duration represents a critical experimental foundation. These parameters directly influence the efficiency of gene silencing by affecting both the initial infection success and the systemic spread of the viral vector throughout the plant. Optimal calibration of these factors is particularly crucial when working with non-model plant species or recalcitrant tissues, where standard protocols often yield suboptimal results. The interplay between bacterial density and co-culture time can determine whether the plant's defense mechanisms are activated, ultimately impacting the reliability of phenotypic data used to characterize NBS gene function in disease resistance pathways.

Comparative Analysis of Optimization Approaches

Research across diverse plant systems reveals that a one-size-fits-all approach to Agrobacterium-mediated VIGS is ineffective. The optimal combination of optical density (OD600) and inoculation time varies significantly based on plant species, target tissue, and viral vector system. The table below summarizes key experimental findings from recent studies:

Table 1: Comparative Analysis of Agrobacterium Density and Inoculation Time Optimization

Plant Species	Optimal OD600	Optimal Inoculation/Co-culture Time	Efficiency Outcomes	Primary Application	Citation
Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)	1.0	8 days post-inoculation (dpi)	56.7% VIGS efficiency, 68.3% virus inoculation rate	VIGS & virus inoculation in stems	[67]
Sunflower (Helianthus annuus)	~6×10² (Low Inoculum)	15 days (Long Co-culture)	Significant increase in transformed shoots; Reduced plant defense response	Stable transformation	[68]
Sunflower (Helianthus annuus)	1.5	6 hours co-cultivation	Up to 91% infection rate (genotype-dependent)	Seed vacuum VIGS	[60]
Soybean (Glycine max)	Information in source	21 dpi for phenotype observation	65-95% silencing efficiency	TRV-VIGS via cotyledon nodes	[26]
Tea Oil Camellia (Camellia drupifera)	0.9-1.0	Not specified	~93.94% infiltration efficiency	VIGS in recalcitrant capsules	[47]

Key Insights from Comparative Data

• Synergistic Effect of LI/LC: The Low Inoculum/Long Co-culture (LI/LC) strategy demonstrates a powerful synergistic effect. In sunflower, this approach generated an average of three transformed shoots per explant, whereas traditional high inoculum/short co-culture failed to produce any transformed shoots [68].
• Species-Specific Optimal Values: The optimal OD600 can range from very low (6×10²) to standard (1.0-1.5) depending on the species and transformation method, highlighting the necessity for empirical optimization [67] [68] [60].
• Time-Dependent Efficiency Progression: The effectiveness of VIGS is not static but progresses over time. In tomato, silencing efficiency peaked at 8 dpi (56.7%), slightly decreasing by 12 dpi (45.0%), indicating an optimal window for observation [67].

Detailed Experimental Protocols for Parameter Optimization

Protocol 1: Injection of No-Apical-Bud Stem Sections (INABS) in Tomato

The INABS method provides a highly efficient system for VIGS and virus inoculation in tomato plants, with specifically optimized parameters for Agrobacterium density and inoculation time [67].

Table 2: Detailed INABS Protocol for Tomato VIGS

Protocol Step	Specific Parameters	Rationale & Notes
Plant Material Preparation	Select "Y-type" stem sections (1-3 cm) with axillary buds, no apical bud	The axillary bud meristem is highly susceptible to TRV infection and facilitates systemic silencing.
Agrobacterium Culture	Resuspend to OD600 = 1.0 in infiltration medium (e.g., with acetosyringone)	OD600 = 1.0 was significantly more efficient than 0.5 or 1.5 in achieving silencing.
Inoculation Method	Inject 100-200 μL slowly into the bare stem using plastic syringe/needle	Continue until a film of infiltration liquid forms at the top of the stem section, indicating full saturation.
Inoculation Duration	8 days post-inoculation for optimal efficiency	Efficiency assessed at 4, 8, and 12 dpi showed peak transformation at 8 dpi (56.7%).
Efficiency Assessment	Visual bleaching (for PDS) and qRT-PCR analysis	qRT-PCR confirmation is essential to correlate phenotypic observations with molecular silencing.

Protocol 2: Low Inoculum/Long Co-culture (LI/LC) for Sunflower Transformation

This innovative approach challenges conventional high-density inoculation protocols by leveraging low bacterial densities with extended co-culture periods to dramatically improve transformation efficiency while minimizing plant defense responses [68].

Table 3: LI/LC Protocol for Sunflower Transformation

Protocol Step	Specific Parameters	Rationale & Notes
Inoculum Preparation	Prepare low-density suspension (~6×10² bacteria mL⁻¹)	This is approximately 1,000,000-fold稀释 compared to conventional protocols (10⁸–10⁹ bacteria mL⁻¹).
Explants Preparation	Use cotyledons from sterilized kernels with embryo axis removed	The cotyledonary tissue is highly regenerative and susceptible to Agrobacterium infection.
Inoculation Method	Immerse explants in low-density Agrobacterium suspension	Ensure complete but brief immersion to avoid tissue damage.
Co-culture Duration	15 days on appropriate co-culture medium	The extended period allows for gradual T-DNA transfer and integration without triggering severe defense responses.
Defense Response Monitoring	qRT-PCR analysis of defense-related genes	LI/LC explants showed lower expression of defense-related genes compared to high inoculum treatments.
Regeneration	Transfer to selective regeneration medium after co-culture	Transgenic shoot production is significantly enhanced with the LI/LC method.

Protocol 3: Seed Vacuum Infiltration for Sunflower VIGS

This protocol offers a simplified approach for sunflower VIGS that eliminates the need for in vitro culture steps, making it accessible for laboratories with limited tissue culture facilities [60].

• Agrobacterium Culture: Grow Agrobacterium (GV3101 with TRV vectors) to OD600 = 1.5 in LB medium with appropriate antibiotics [60].
• Seed Preparation: Peel seed coats to facilitate infiltration. No surface sterilization or in vitro recovery steps are required [60].
• Vacuum Infiltration: Submerge seeds in Agrobacterium suspension and apply vacuum (approximately 0.8 bar) for 30 minutes [60].
• Co-cultivation: Briefly co-cultivate seeds for 6 hours on moist filter paper [60].
• Plant Growth: Transfer seeds directly to soil and grow under standard greenhouse conditions [60].
• Genotype Consideration: Account for genotype-dependent variation in VIGS efficiency, which ranged from 62% to 91% across different sunflower genotypes [60].

Visualizing Workflows and Relationships

Experimental Workflow for Parameter Optimization

The following diagram illustrates the key decision points and experimental steps in optimizing Agrobacterium density and inoculation duration for VIGS experiments:

Diagram 1: VIGS Parameter Optimization Workflow

Molecular Relationship in Agrobacterium-Plant Interaction

The relationship between Agrobacterium density, plant defense responses, and transformation efficiency can be visualized as a balancing act, as shown in the following diagram:

Diagram 2: Agrobacterium Density and Plant Defense Balance

Essential Research Reagent Solutions

Successful implementation of optimized Agrobacterium parameters requires specific reagent systems and molecular tools. The following table details key research reagents essential for VIGS studies focused on NBS gene functional validation:

Table 4: Research Reagent Solutions for VIGS Experiments

Reagent/Vector	Specific Function	Application Notes	Citation
TRV VIGS System (pTRV1/pTRV2)	Bipartite RNA virus vector for inducing gene silencing	Most widely used VIGS system; suitable for Solanaceae and other families	[67] [39]
Agrobacterium Strain GV3101	Disarmed Agrobacterium strain for plant transformation	Preferred for VIGS due to high transformation efficiency; contains rifampicin resistance	[26] [60]
pBR322-Derived Acceptor Strains	Engineered Rhizobium rhizogenes strains for hairy root transformation	Useful for composite plant generation; requires specific integration vectors	[69]
Acetosyringone	Phenolic compound that induces vir gene expression	Critical for enhancing T-DNA transfer; typically used at 100-200 μM	[47]
Modified pTRV2 Vectors (pNC-TRV2, pNC-TRV2-GFP)	TRV2 derivatives with enhanced cloning features or fluorescent markers	Facilitate cloning and visual tracking of infection efficiency	[47]
MES Buffer	pH buffer for Agrobacterium resuspension	Maintains optimal pH (5.6) for vir gene induction during plant inoculation	[60]

The systematic optimization of Agrobacterium culture density and inoculation duration emerges as a fundamental prerequisite for successful VIGS-based functional validation of plant NBS genes. The experimental data consistently demonstrate that moving beyond standardized protocols to species- and tissue-specific optimization can yield dramatic improvements in silencing efficiency. Based on the comparative analysis, the following research recommendations are proposed:

• Embrace the LI/LC Strategy: For challenging plant systems, implement Low Inoculum/Long Co-culture approaches to minimize plant defense responses while maximizing T-DNA integration events [68].
• Conduct Time-Course Analyses: Include multiple time points (e.g., 4, 8, 12 dpi) in efficiency assessments to identify optimal silencing windows rather than relying on single endpoint evaluations [67].
• Account for Genotypic Variation: When working with multiple plant genotypes, anticipate and systematically evaluate genotype-dependent differences in VIGS efficiency [60].
• Employ Molecular Confirmation: Correlate visual silencing phenotypes with qRT-PCR analysis to confirm target gene knockdown at the molecular level, particularly when optimizing parameters for new plant systems [67] [60].

The strategic optimization of these fundamental parameters enables more reliable functional characterization of NBS genes involved in plant immunity, ultimately accelerating research in plant disease resistance mechanisms and crop improvement.

Selecting Optimal Plant Developmental Stages for Maximum Silencing

Virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) efficiency is profoundly influenced by plant developmental stage, with optimal timing varying significantly across species and tissue types. Recent studies demonstrate that systematic optimization of developmental stage can achieve silencing efficiencies exceeding 90% in recalcitrant species, enabling robust functional genomics research. This guide compares the performance of stage-specific VIGS protocols across model and crop species, providing researchers with experimental frameworks for maximizing silencing efficacy in functional validation of plant nucleotide-binding site (NBS) genes.

Virus-induced gene silencing has emerged as a powerful reverse genetics tool for rapid functional analysis of genes in plants that pose challenges for stable transformation. The technique exploits the plant's RNA interference machinery, using recombinant viruses carrying fragments of target genes to trigger sequence-specific mRNA degradation [47]. While VIGS has been widely applied across plant species, its efficiency is critically dependent on developmental timing, with optimal stages varying based on tissue type, plant species, and target gene expression patterns. For functional validation of NBS domain genes—a key superfamily of plant resistance genes—optimizing VIGS timing is particularly crucial for accurate assessment of gene function in pathogen defense [2].

Comparative Analysis of Developmental Stage Efficiency

Table 1: VIGS Efficiency Across Developmental Stages in Various Plant Species

Plant Species	Target Tissue	Developmental Stage	Target Gene	Silencing Efficiency	Key Findings
Camellia drupifera	Capsules	Early stage (279 DAP)	CdCRY1	~69.80%	Optimal for exocarp pigmentation genes [47]
Camellia drupifera	Capsules	Mid stage (279 DAP)	CdLAC15	~90.91%	Optimal for mesocarp pigmentation genes [47]
Tomato	Leaves, fruits	Various	APC/C subunits	Variable	Silencing affected cell division and expansion [70]
Tomato	Whole plant	5-7 weeks post-silencing	SlUBA1/SlUBA2	Severe abnormalities	Dual knockdown resulted in plant death [71]
Cotton	Leaves	Not specified	GaNBS (OG2)	Successful silencing	Confirmed role in virus resistance [2]

DAP = Days after pollination

Detailed Methodologies for Stage-Optimized VIGS

Protocol 1: Pericarp Cutting Immersion for Recalcitrant Tissues

The following methodology has been optimized for woody plants with firmly lignified capsules, achieving approximately 93.94% infiltration efficiency [47]:

• Plant Material Selection: Collect Camellia drupifera capsules at 279 days post-pollination from 20-year-old trees. For NBS gene studies, select plants at similar maturity stages.

• Vector Construction:

  • Select 200-300 bp target gene fragments using the SGN VIGS Tool (vigs.solgenomics.net)
  • Amplify fragments from cDNA using high-fidelity DNA polymerase with the following program: initial denaturation at 98°C for 4 min, 30 cycles of 98°C for 10s, 59°C for 15s, 72°C for 20s, final extension at 72°C for 5min [47]
  • Clone into pNC-TRV2 vectors using Nimble Cloning system
  • Transform into E. coli DH5α competent cells and verify by sequencing

• Agrobacterium Preparation:

  • Transform verified plasmids into Agrobacterium strain
  • Culture in YEB medium with 25 μg/mL kanamycin and 50 μg/mL rifampicin at 28°C for 48 hours
  • Scale up culture in 50mL YEB medium with 5mL MES (pH 5.6, 0.2M) and 5μL acetosyringone (0.1M)
  • Harvest at OD600 0.9-1.0 by centrifugation at 5000rpm for 15 minutes [47]

• Inoculation:

  • Prepare experimental groups (TRV1 + TRV2-target) and control (TRV1 + TRV2-empty)
  • Use pericarp cutting immersion method for capsule infiltration
  • Apply at identified optimal developmental stages

Protocol 2: Orthogonal Analysis for Stage Optimization

For determining optimal developmental stages in new species or tissues:

• Experimental Design: Employ orthogonal analysis with three factors: silencing target, inoculation approach, and developmental stage [47]

• Inoculation Methods Comparison:

  • Peduncle injection
  • Direct pericarp injection
  • Pericarp cutting immersion (most efficient at 93.94%)
  • Fruit-bearing shoot infusion

• Developmental Staging: Test five distinct developmental stages from early to late maturation

• Efficiency Assessment: Select genes with visible phenotypes (e.g., pigmentation genes CdCRY1 and CdLAC15) for rapid efficiency quantification [47]

Signaling Pathways and Experimental Workflows

Diagram 1: VIGS Experimental Workflow for NBS Genes. Developmental stage selection is a critical optimization point.

Diagram 2: NBS Gene Validation via Developmental Stage-Optimized VIGS. Timing critically impacts silencing efficiency and functional validation.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 2: Key Research Reagents for VIGS Experiments in Plant Functional Genomics

Reagent/Resource	Function/Application	Specifications	Example Sources
TRV Vectors	VIGS delivery system	pNC-TRV2, pNC-TRV2-GFP variants	Dr. Yan Pu, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences [47]
High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase	Amplification of target fragments	Minimal error rate for faithful fragment reproduction	Yeasen, China [47]
Agrobacterium Strains	Plant transformation	Compatible with TRV vectors	Common lab strains [47]
SGN VIGS Tool	Fragment design	Identifies unique 200-300bp regions with <40% off-target similarity	Sol Genomics Network [47]
RNAprep Pure Kit	RNA extraction from plant tissues	Maintains RNA integrity for cDNA synthesis	Tiangen, China [47]
OrthoFinder	Evolutionary analysis of gene families	Identifies orthogroups for functional studies	v2.5.1 with DIAMOND tool [2]

Critical Factors Influencing Stage-Specific Silencing Efficiency

• Tissue Competence for Viral Movement: Younger tissues generally allow better viral spread but may not express all target genes. The Camellia drupifera study demonstrated that early stages (~69.80% efficiency for CdCRY1) and mid stages (~90.91% for CdLAC15) show differential optimization based on target gene function [47].

• Cell Division vs. Expansion Status: Silencing APC/C subunits in tomato revealed that cell division and expansion phases respond differently to VIGS, with substantial impacts on final organ size [70].

• Target Gene Expression Patterns: For NBS genes involved in defense responses, silencing efficiency must align with periods of gene activity, which often coincides with pathogen perception windows [2].

• Environmental Interactions: Developmental timing interacts with environmental conditions; Camellia drupifera studies were conducted in subtropical climates with specific temperature ranges that influenced results [47].

Optimal plant developmental stages for maximum VIGS efficiency are species-specific, tissue-dependent, and target gene-determined. Based on current evidence, researchers should:

• Conduct pilot studies testing multiple developmental stages when working with new species or tissues
• Prioritize stages where target genes are actively expressed but before complete tissue lignification
• Utilize visible marker genes (e.g., pigmentation genes) for rapid efficiency assessment
• For NBS gene validation, align silencing with developmental stages most relevant to pathogen interaction

The systematic optimization of developmental stage significantly enhances VIGS reliability for functional genomics, particularly for challenging targets like NBS domain genes in plant immunity pathways.

Ensuring Target Specificity and Minimizing Off-Target Effects

In the functional validation of plant nucleotide-binding site-leucine-rich repeat (NBS-LRR) genes, achieving high target specificity is paramount for generating reliable, interpretable data. Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) has emerged as a powerful reverse genetics tool, but like all genetic perturbation technologies, it faces the critical challenge of off-target effects. This guide provides an objective comparison of specificity between VIGS and alternative approaches, supported by experimental data and detailed protocols, to empower researchers in making informed methodological decisions for NBS gene validation.

Molecular Mechanisms of Target Specificity and Off-Target Effects

VIGS Specificity Mechanisms

VIGS operates through sequence-specific RNA silencing, leveraging the plant's innate antiviral defense machinery. When recombinant viral vectors containing host gene fragments infect plants, double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) intermediates generated during viral replication are recognized and processed by the host's RNA silencing machinery. This results in sequence-specific degradation of complementary endogenous mRNA transcripts through post-transcriptional gene silencing [72].

The core determinant of VIGS specificity is sequence complementarity between the viral-delivered fragment and the target transcript. Studies demonstrate that 21-30 nucleotide regions with perfect or near-perfect complementarity are sufficient to trigger silencing, though longer fragments (150-300 bp) typically yield more reliable and potent silencing [72]. The selection of target sequence regions critically influences specificity, with exotic regions less likely to cross-silence related gene family members.

CRISPR-Cas9 Off-Target Mechanisms

CRISPR-Cas9 systems face distinct specificity challenges rooted in DNA recognition mechanics. Off-target effects occur when the Cas9-sgRNA complex binds and cleaves genomic sites with sequence similarity to the intended target, particularly problematic in plant NBS-LRR genes that often exist as large gene families with high sequence homology [73].

Key factors influencing CRISPR off-target activity include:

• sgRNA-DNA complementarity: Mismatches, particularly in the PAM-distal region, may be tolerated
• Chromatin accessibility: Open chromatin regions are more susceptible to off-target editing
• Cas9 expression levels: High concentrations increase off-target probability
• sgRNA structure: Secondary structures can influence binding specificity [73]

The diagram below illustrates the comparative specificity mechanisms of VIGS and CRISPR-Cas9:

Comparative Performance Analysis: Quantitative Data

Table 1: Specificity and Efficiency Comparison Between VIGS and CRISPR-Cas9

Parameter	VIGS	CRISPR-Cas9	Experimental Support
Typical silencing/efficiency	70-90% transcript reduction	Varies widely by system	CGMMV-VIGS achieved strong phenotypic silencing in Luffa [72]
Time to phenotype	1-3 weeks	Weeks to months (stable lines)	VIGS: 1-2 weeks from infection [74]
Off-target detection methods	RNA-Seq, qPCR validation	WGS, GUIDE-Seq, CIRCLE-Seq	CRISPR off-target detection limited by sensitivity [73]
Key specificity factors	Fragment length (150-300 bp), uniqueness, GC content	sgRNA specificity, PAM proximity, chromatin state	300 bp fragments effective in CGMMV-VIGS [72]
NBS-LRR application challenges	Cross-silencing of homologous genes	Editing of redundant gene family members	NBS genes often clustered with high homology [11]
Control experiments	Empty vector, non-targeting sequences	Multiple sgRNAs, inactive Cas9	pV190 empty vector control in CGMMV system [72]

Table 2: Experimental Validation Approaches for Assessing Specificity

Validation Method	Technology	Key Metrics	Protocol Details
RNA-Seq transcriptomics	Both	Genome-wide expression changes, unexpected pathway alterations	Pepper-PMMoV study identified 5882 DEGs in susceptible interaction [75]
RT-qPCR confirmation	Primarily VIGS	Target gene reduction, related gene family expression	LaPDS silencing confirmed by significant RT-qPCR reduction [72]
Phenotypic consistency	Both	Correlation between molecular and observable traits	Photobleaching in PDS-silenced plants validates specificity [72]
Western blot	Both	Protein-level reduction confirmation	Not consistently performed in VIGS studies
Alternative fragment/sgRNA	Both	Reproducibility across different target sequences	Multiple independent sgRNAs recommended for CRISPR [73]

Detailed Experimental Protocols for Specificity Assessment

VIGS Specificity Validation Protocol

Based on established CGMMV-VIGS methodology in Luffa [72]:

Step 1: Target Fragment Selection and Vector Construction

• Amplify 250-300 bp fragment from target NBS gene using gene-specific primers with BamHI restriction sites
• Clone into pV190 CGMMV vector using BamHI restriction sites
• Transform into Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101
• Key controls: Empty pV190 vector, non-targeting sequence

Step 2: Plant Inoculation and Monitoring

• Grow plants to 2-true-leaf stage under 16h light/8h dark at 28°C
• Prepare Agrobacterium suspension in infiltration buffer (10 mM MgClâ‚‚, 10 mM MES, 200 μM AS) to OD₆₀₀ = 0.8-1.0
• Incubate at room temperature for 2+ hours before inoculation
• Create small wounds on cotyledons and true leaves with syringe needle
• Infiltrate bacterial suspension from abaxial leaf side using needleless syringe
• Maintain high humidity for 24h post-infiltration, then normal growth conditions

Step 3: Specificity Assessment

• Monitor phenotype development over 14 days
• Harvest tissue showing silencing phenotype for molecular analysis
• Extract total RNA from silenced and control tissues
• Perform RT-qPCR to quantify target gene expression reduction
• Analyze expression of closest homologous genes to detect cross-silencing

CRISPR-Cas9 Off-Target Assessment Protocol

Adapted from methodologies for detecting off-target activity [73]:

Step 1: Computational Prediction and sgRNA Design

• Identify all potential off-target sites using Cas-OFFinder, CCTop, or similar tools
• Allow up to 5 nucleotide mismatches, particularly in PAM-distal region
• Design sgRNAs with maximal uniqueness scores and minimal off-target predictions
• Include multiple sgRNAs targeting the same gene as biological replicates

Step 2: Experimental Off-Target Detection

• Transfer plant material with confirmed on-target editing
• Perform whole genome sequencing on edited and wild-type plants
• Use GUIDE-Seq or CIRCLE-Seq for enhanced off-target detection sensitivity
• Analyze all predicted off-target sites by targeted sequencing

Step 3: Specificity Validation

• Confirm phenotypic consistency across multiple independent lines
• Sequence closely related gene family members
• For NBS-LRR genes, validate expected immune response perturbations

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 3: Key Reagents for Specificity-Focused Functional Genomics

Reagent/Resource	Function	Specificity Application	Example/Reference
CGMMV VIGS vector (pV190)	Viral delivery system	Base vector for cucurbit NBS gene silencing	[72]
TRV VIGS vectors	Viral delivery system	Solanaceae NBS gene silencing, broad host range	[74]
Cas9 variants (High-fidelity)	Genome editing	Reduced off-target editing (e.g., eSpCas9, SpCas9-HF1)	[73]
Off-target prediction tools	Bioinformatics	Computational identification of potential off-target sites	Cas-OFFinder, CCTop [73]
Whole genome sequencing	Validation	Comprehensive off-target detection in CRISPR-edited plants	Recommended for therapeutic applications [73]
qPCR reagents	Validation	Target gene expression quantification in VIGS	SYBR Green protocols [72]

Strategic Recommendations for NBS-LRR Researchers

The choice between VIGS and CRISPR-Cas9 for NBS gene validation involves critical trade-offs between speed and specificity assurance:

For preliminary screening of NBS gene function, VIGS offers rapid turnaround with generally sufficient specificity, particularly when targeting unique regions within NBS domains. The CGMMV-VIGS system achieves effective silencing within 1-2 weeks, enabling rapid phenotypic assessment [72].

For definitive characterization requiring maximal specificity, CRISPR-Cas9 with high-fidelity variants provides permanent, DNA-level modification, though requiring more extensive validation. The multiplexing capability of CRISPR is particularly valuable for addressing functional redundancy in NBS-LRR gene families [11].

Critical specificity controls across both platforms include:

• Multiple independent target sequences per gene
• Comprehensive expression analysis of homologous genes
• Phenotypic consistency across biological replicates
• Appropriate empty-vector and non-targeting controls

Researchers should align their choice of technology with experimental goals, time constraints, and the specific NBS-LRR gene family characteristics, particularly considering the tandem duplication patterns observed in pepper NLR genes [11].

Rigorous Validation and Comparative Analysis: From Phenotyping to Mechanistic Insights

Phenotypic validation is a cornerstone in plant functional genomics, serving as the definitive step to link genetic sequences to observable biological functions. In the context of plant immunity, this process primarily involves the precise assessment of disease symptoms and the quantification of the hypersensitive response (HR)—a rapid, localized cell death at pathogen infection sites that constitutes a key defense mechanism in plants [76]. For researchers investigating nucleotide-binding site (NBS) domain genes, which encode a major class of plant immune receptors, robust phenotypic validation is essential for confirming gene function [2]. With the advent of functional genomics tools, particularly virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS), researchers can now rapidly connect genetic information to phenotypic outcomes, creating an urgent need for standardized, quantifiable assessment methods. This guide provides a comprehensive comparison of current methodologies for disease scoring and HR assessment, with specific application to the functional validation of plant NBS genes through VIGS research, enabling scientists to select the most appropriate protocols for their experimental systems.

Disease Scoring Methodologies: Quantitative Comparison

Disease scoring systems provide structured approaches to quantify plant health and disease progression. The table below compares established methodologies used across different pathosystems.

Table 1: Comparative Analysis of Disease Scoring Systems

Scoring System	Application Context	Measured Parameters	Output Scale	Key Advantages	Documented Limitations
Disease Severity Scoring System (DS3)	Gaucher Disease (Human); adapted for plant phenotyping [77]	Multi-domain assessment: bone, hematologic, visceral manifestations	Continuous numerical (0-19)	Integrated multi-parameter assessment; validated for treatment monitoring	Originally developed for human disease; requires plant-specific adaptation
Electrolyte Leakage Assay	Plant hypersensitive response quantification [78]	Ion leakage from damaged cells as measure of programmed cell death	Conductivity (μS/cm) over time	Highly quantitative; excellent temporal resolution; high-throughput capability	Requires specialized equipment; does not distinguish cell death types
Clinical Phenotyping (Sepsis-derived)	Sepsis sub-phenotypes (Human); inspiration for plant stress categorization [79]	Clinical biomarkers, organ dysfunction	Categorical (α, β, γ, δ phenotypes)	Identifies distinct response patterns; reveals heterogeneity in populations	Derived from human medical data; correlation with plant biology not established
Visual Necrosis Scoring	Plant-fungal and plant-bacterial interactions [80]	Area of cell death, lesion size, chlorosis	Categorical (0-5) or percentage-based	Technically simple; no specialized equipment needed	Subjective; limited resolution for subtle differences
Trypan Blue Staining	Cell death visualization in plant-pathogen interactions [78] [80]	Percentage of stained (dead) cells in tissue	Percentage or categorical score	Direct visualization of dead cells; distinguishes living/dead tissue	Destructive method; requires tissue processing and microscopy

Each system offers distinct advantages depending on research objectives. The multi-domain DS3 approach provides comprehensive assessment but requires extensive validation in plant systems [77]. Electrolyte leakage delivers exceptional temporal resolution for kinetic studies of HR progression [78], while visual scoring methods offer accessibility but with inherent subjectivity.

Hypersensitive Response Assessment: Experimental Protocols

Electrolyte Leakage Measurement for HR Quantification

The electrolyte leakage assay represents a gold standard for quantitative HR assessment, providing a sensitive measure of membrane integrity disruption during programmed cell death [78].

Detailed Protocol:

• Plant Material Preparation: Grow plants under controlled conditions. For Arabidopsis, use 5-6 week old plants under short day conditions (8h light/16h dark) at 22°C/18°C and 60% relative humidity [78].
• Pathogen Inoculation:
  • For bacterial pathogens (e.g., Pseudomonas syringae), culture strains carrying specific avirulence effectors (AvrRpm1, AvrRpt2, AvrRps4) on King's B medium with appropriate antibiotics.
  • Resuspend bacteria in 10 mM MgClâ‚‚ to desired OD₆₀₀ (typically 0.1-0.4 for HR assays).
• Vacuum Infiltration Method (superior to syringe infiltration for reproducibility and throughput):
  • Punch leaf discs (7mm diameter) using cork borer against Styrofoam.
  • Place approximately 35 discs from 3 individual plants per treatment in 50ml centrifuge tubes.
  • Cover discs with 20ml bacterial suspension.
  • Place tubes in vacuum concentrator with lids loosely tightened.
  • Decrease pressure until bacterial suspension boils at room temperature, maintain for 10 seconds.
  • Quickly release vacuum to atmospheric pressure.
  • Assess infiltration efficiency (75-100% of discs should lose buoyancy); repeat if necessary [78].
• Electrolyte Leakage Measurement:
  • Transfer infiltrated discs to Petri dishes with water, then select fully infiltrated discs without damage.
  • Place four discs per well in 6-well cell culture plates with 10ml deionized water (6 replicates per treatment).
  • Measure conductivity by transferring 5ml bathing solution to 15ml tube with conductivity meter.
  • Return solution to well after measurement.
  • Continue measurements every 30-60 minutes for 4-8 hours to capture HR progression [78].

Critical Considerations: This method demonstrated that lower bacterial inocula not only reduce HR amplitude but also delay the timing of maximum response rate, highlighting the importance of standardized titer in comparative studies [78].

Histochemical Staining and Microscopy

Trypan Blue Staining Protocol [78] [80]:

• Place four infiltrated leaf discs in microcentrifuge tube.
• Cover with staining solution (0.025% trypan blue in equal volumes of phenol, glycerol, lactic acid, and water).
• Incubate at 95°C in heating block for 2.5 minutes.
• Remove staining solution and destain with chloral hydrate solution (2.5g/ml) or store discs in 50% glycerol.
• Visualize under microscope - dead cells stain blue.

Critical Applications: This method is particularly valuable for validating HR in VIGS experiments, such as confirming silenced plants show altered cell death responses compared to controls [81].

VIGS-Based Functional Validation of NBS Genes

VIGS has emerged as a powerful reverse genetics tool for functional characterization of NBS genes, allowing rapid assessment of gene function without stable transformation.

VIGS Experimental Workflow for NBS Gene Validation

The following diagram illustrates the complete experimental pipeline for functional validation of NBS genes using VIGS:

VIGS Protocol for Soybean and Related Species

TRV-Based VIGS System Optimization [26]:

• Vector Construction:
  • Amplify 300-500bp target gene fragment from cDNA using gene-specific primers with EcoRI and XhoI adapters.
  • Ligate into pTRV2 vector digested with EcoRI and XhoI.
  • Transform into E. coli DH5α, verify by sequencing.
  • Introduce correct plasmid into Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101.

• Agroinfiltration Method:

  • Soak sterilized soybeans in sterile water until swollen.
  • Bisect seeds longitudinally to obtain half-seed explants.
  • Immerse fresh explants in Agrobacterium suspension (OD₆₀₀ = 1.0-2.0) containing pTRV1 or pTRV2 derivatives for 20-30 minutes.
  • Use sterile tissue culture procedures throughout to maintain explant viability.

• Efficiency Validation:

  • Assess infection efficiency 4 days post-infection by examining GFP fluorescence under microscope.
  • Effective infectivity should exceed 80%, reaching up to 95% for optimized varieties [26].
  • Confirm silencing efficiency (65-95%) through qRT-PCR of target genes.

Critical Applications: This system successfully validated the role of the GmRpp6907 rust resistance gene (an NBS-LRR gene) in soybean, demonstrating reduced HR upon pathogen challenge in silenced plants [26]. Similarly, silencing of GaNBS (orthogroup OG2) in resistant cotton increased susceptibility to cotton leaf curl disease, confirming its role in virus resistance [2].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 2: Essential Research Reagents for Disease Scoring and HR Assessment

Reagent/Resource	Specific Application	Function/Purpose	Example Usage
TRV VIGS Vectors (pTRV1, pTRV2)	Plant gene silencing	Viral vectors for targeted gene silencing	Silencing candidate NBS genes in soybean, tobacco, tomato [26] [81]
Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101	Plant transformation	Delivery of VIGS constructs into plant cells	Cotyledon node infection for systemic silencing [26]
Conductivity Meter	Electrolyte leakage assay	Quantifies ion release from dying cells	HR kinetics measurement in Arabidopsis with bacterial effectors [78]
Trypan Blue Stain	Cell death visualization	Selective staining of dead plant cells	Distinguishing HR cell death in Brassica-pieris interactions [80]
Pathogen Strains with Avirulence Effectors	HR elicitation	Specific activation of R-gene mediated immunity	P. syringae DC3000 with AvrRpm1, AvrRpt2, AvrRps4 [78]
Foxtail Mosaic Virus (FoMV) VIGS	Monocot gene silencing	VIGS vector for grasses and cereals	Silencing HR modulators in maize Rp1-D21 system [81]
Salicylic Acid (SA) & Methyl Jasmonate (MeJA)	Defense hormone treatments	Phytohormone application to probe signaling pathways	Testing defense pathway involvement in LuWRKY39-mediated resistance [23]

Integration of Assessment Methods in NBS Gene Validation

The most robust functional validation comes from integrating multiple assessment methods. A prime example comes from maize research, where VIGS-mediated silencing of HSP90—a chaperone required for NLR protein stability—demonstrated significantly reduced HR in the autoactive Rp1-D21 system [81]. Conversely, silencing of SGT1 unexpectedly enhanced HR severity, revealing complex regulation of NBS protein activity [81].

Similarly, in flax, VIGS silencing of LuWRKY39—a transcription factor regulating NBS gene expression—increased susceptibility to Septoria linicola, confirmed through both disease scoring and molecular analysis of defense gene expression [23]. These integrated approaches demonstrate how phenotypic validation directly informs our understanding of NBS gene function in plant immunity networks.

When selecting assessment methods, researchers should consider their specific pathosystem, available instrumentation, and required throughput. Electrolyte leakage provides the highest quantitative precision for HR kinetics, while visual scoring offers accessibility for high-throughput screening. Combining these methods with VIGS creates a powerful platform for accelerating the functional characterization of plant NBS genes in disease resistance.

Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) has established itself as the gold standard technique for precise quantification of gene expression in plant molecular biology due to its exceptional sensitivity, reproducibility, and dynamic range [82]. In the context of functional validation of plant nucleotide-binding site (NBS) genes through virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS), qRT-PCR serves two critical purposes: validation of silencing efficiency and analysis of transcriptional changes in downstream genes. The technique enables researchers to quantify the knockdown efficiency of target NBS genes post-VIGS treatment and to investigate subsequent expression changes in defense-related pathways, thereby establishing causal relationships between gene silencing and phenotypic outcomes.

The accuracy of qRT-PCR data, however, is heavily dependent on proper experimental design and rigorous normalization strategies [83]. When analyzing samples with substantial morphological differences, such as those resulting from disease symptoms or developmental alterations, standard normalization approaches may yield biologically meaningless data [83]. This technical guide provides a comprehensive comparison of qRT-PCR methodologies for analyzing silencing efficiency and transcript profiles within plant NBS gene research, supported by experimental data and optimized protocols.

Critical Considerations for qRT-PCR Experimental Design

Reference Gene Selection and Validation

The selection of appropriate reference genes constitutes the foundation of reliable qRT-PCR data. Traditional housekeeping genes (HKGs) once assumed to maintain constant expression across all conditions, have been demonstrated to exhibit significant expression variability under different experimental scenarios [84]. Research in lotus (Nelumbo nucifera) has revealed that optimal reference genes vary substantially across different tissue types and developmental stages [84]. As detailed in Table 1, comprehensive stability analysis identified TBP and UBQ as the most stable reference genes for rhizome expansion, while TBP and EF-1α performed best across various floral tissues [84].

Table 1: Optimal Reference Genes for Different Experimental Conditions in Lotus

Experimental Condition	Most Stable Reference Genes	Validation Method	Least Stable Reference Genes
Rhizome expansion	TBP, UBQ	geNorm, NormFinder	-
Various floral tissues	TBP, EF-1α	geNorm, NormFinder	-
Seed development stages	ACT, GAPDH	geNorm, NormFinder	-
Leaf development stages	CYP, GAPDH	geNorm, NormFinder	TUA

An innovative approach emerging from tomato research demonstrates that a stable combination of non-stable genes can outperform individual reference genes for data normalization [82]. This method identifies a fixed number of genes whose individual expressions balance each other across all experimental conditions of interest. By leveraging comprehensive RNA-Seq databases, researchers can extract optimal gene combinations in silico that reflect in vivo stability, providing superior normalization compared to classic housekeeping genes or other stably expressed genes [82].

Impact of Sample Morphology on qRT-PCR Accuracy

A frequently overlooked yet critical factor in qRT-PCR analysis is the influence of sample morphology on data accuracy. Research on Arabidopsis thaliana mutants with altered floral morphology demonstrated that comparing gene expression levels in objects with dramatically different morphologies can produce erroneous results [83]. In the ag-1 mutant, which displays a significant increase in floral organ number, qRT-PCR analysis indicated a major decrease in WUSCHEL (WUS) expression despite experimental evidence from other methods confirming the expansion of its expression area [83].

This apparent contradiction stems from a fundamental limitation of standard normalization methods: when the expression area of reference genes increases substantially due to morphological changes (e.g., increased organ number), the quantification of target gene expression becomes distorted [83]. This effect is particularly relevant in VIGS experiments where silencing of developmental genes might induce morphological alterations. Researchers must therefore exercise caution when interpreting qRT-PCR data from samples with pronounced morphological differences and consider alternative validation methods such as in situ hybridization when morphological artifacts are suspected [83].

qRT-PCR Protocol for VIGS Validation

RNA Extraction and Quality Control

The initial and most crucial step in any qRT-PCR experiment is the extraction of high-quality RNA. For plant tissues, particularly those rich in secondary metabolites like lotus, the addition of PVP K30 during grinding is essential to eliminate interfering polysaccharides and polyphenols [84]. The integrity of extracted RNA should be verified through agarose gel electrophoresis, and RNA purity assessed using spectrophotometric methods with acceptable 260/280 ratios between 1.8-2.1 [84] [85]. To minimize genomic DNA contamination, all RNA samples should undergo treatment with RNase-free DNase I prior to cDNA synthesis [84].

For VIGS experiments, sampling timepoints are critical for accurate assessment of silencing efficiency. Research on tobacco rattle virus (TRV)-based VIGS in soybean indicates that effective silencing phenotypes typically emerge around 21 days post-inoculation (dpi), making this an optimal timeframe for initial efficiency assessment [26]. However, time-course experiments may be necessary to capture the dynamics of gene silencing and subsequent transcriptional changes in pathway genes.

cDNA Synthesis and qPCR Amplification

Reverse transcription should be performed using standardized kits according to manufacturer instructions. The resulting cDNA should be diluted appropriately (typically 1:5 to 1:10) to minimize PCR inhibitors [84]. For the qPCR reaction itself, a typical 20μL reaction volume contains:

• 10μL of 2× SYBR Green PreMix
• 0.6μL of each primer (10 nM concentration)
• 2μL of diluted cDNA template
• 6.8μL of RNase-free water [84]

The thermal cycling conditions generally include an initial denaturation at 95°C for 15 minutes, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 15 seconds and annealing/extension at 60°C for 1 minute [84]. Melting curve analysis must be performed after amplification to verify reaction specificity and absence of primer-dimer formations.

Primer Design and Validation

Primer specificity is paramount for accurate qRT-PCR results. For VIGS validation, primers should be designed to amplify regions outside the fragment used for silencing to avoid detecting the viral vector itself. Key considerations for primer design include:

• Amplicon length between 80-200 bp
• Primer melting temperatures of 58-62°C
• GC content of 40-60%
• Avoidance of secondary structures and self-complementarity

All primers must be validated for efficiency using standard curves generated from serial cDNA dilutions. Amplification efficiency should fall between 90-110%, with correlation coefficients (R²) exceeding 0.985 [84]. The advent of RNA-seq databases has facilitated in silico primer validation, enabling researchers to verify target specificity against comprehensive transcriptome data [82].

Analysis of NBS Gene Expression in Disease Resistance

NBS Gene Families in Plant Immunity

Nucleotide-binding site (NBS) domain genes represent one of the largest families of plant resistance (R) genes, playing pivotal roles in pathogen recognition and defense activation [2]. Genome-wide analyses have identified extensive NBS gene families across plant species, with 121 NBS-LRR genes documented in chickpea and 12,820 NBS-domain-containing genes identified across 34 plant species ranging from mosses to monocots and dicots [86] [2]. These genes are categorized into different structural classes, primarily TIR-NBS-LRR (TNL) and CC-NBS-LRR (CNL), based on their N-terminal domains [86].

Table 2: NBS-LRR Gene Expression in Chickpea Following Ascochyta Blight Infection

Expression Pattern	Number of Genes	Representative Examples	Functional Implications
Differential expression in both resistant and susceptible genotypes	22	CaNBS17, CaNBS42	General involvement in pathogen response
Genotype-specific expression	5	CaNBS8, CaNBS11	Potential determinants of resistance specificity
Co-localized with known QTLs	30	CaNBS23, CaNBS45	Candidate genes for marker-assisted selection

Research on chickpea response to Ascochyta blight infection revealed that 27 of 30 NBS-LRR genes co-localized with known quantitative trait loci (QTLs) showed differential expression following pathogen challenge [86]. The majority of these genes responded in both resistant and susceptible genotypes, indicating their broad involvement in pathogen perception and defense signaling, while five exhibited genotype-specific expression patterns potentially determining resistance specificity [86].

Signaling Pathways in Plant Immunity

The following diagram illustrates the central position of NBS-LRR genes in plant immune signaling pathways and the points where VIGS and qRT-PCR experimental approaches interact with this system:

Diagram 1: NBS-LRR genes in plant immunity and molecular analysis approaches. NBS-LRR proteins act as intracellular immune receptors that recognize pathogen effectors, activating effector-triggered immunity (ETI). VIGS selectively silences these genes, while qRT-PCR validates silencing efficiency and analyzes downstream defense gene expression.

Comparative Analysis of qRT-PCR Applications

Validation of VIGS Efficiency

The integration of qRT-PCR with VIGS technology has revolutionized functional genomics in plants, particularly for species with challenging transformation systems. Recent advances in VIGS methodology have achieved remarkable silencing efficiencies of 65-95% in soybean using TRV-based vectors delivered through Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated infection of cotyledon nodes [26]. Similar success has been documented in recalcitrant species like Camellia drupifera, where optimized VIGS protocols attained 93.94% infiltration efficiency through pericarp cutting immersion [47].

qRT-PCR validation provides crucial quantitative data on silencing efficiency that correlates with observable phenotypes. For instance, silencing of the GmPDS gene in soybean resulted in obvious photobleaching symptoms at 21 dpi, confirming successful knockdown of this visual marker gene [26]. In cotton NBS gene research, VIGS-mediated silencing of GaNBS (OG2) demonstrated its putative role in viral titer reduction, establishing a direct functional link between this NBS gene and disease resistance [2].

Transcriptional Profiling in Disease Resistance

qRT-PCR enables precise monitoring of defense-related transcript accumulation following pathogen challenge. Research on banana blood disease (BBD) resistance identified several key defense genes showing significant upregulation as early as 12 hours post-inoculation with Ralstonia syzygii subsp. celebesensis [85]. The enrichment of molecular processes including xyloglucan endotransglucosylase hydrolases, receptor-like kinases, and glycine-rich proteins at 24 hours post-inoculation highlighted the activation of effector-triggered immunity in resistant cultivars [85].

Similar expression dynamics have been observed in other pathosystems. Chickpea NBS-LRR genes displayed distinct temporal expression patterns following Ascochyta rabiei infection, with some genes showing early induction (6 hours post-inoculation) while others responded later in the infection process [86]. These expression kinetics provide valuable insights into the potential sequence of defense gene activation and functional specialization within the NBS-LRR family.

Table 3: Comparison of qRT-PCR Applications in Plant Disease Resistance Studies

Application	Key Parameters	Technical Advantages	Methodological Limitations
VIGS efficiency validation	Silencing percentage (65-95%), Time to phenotype (21 dpi)	Quantitative, Correlates with phenotype	Potential off-target effects, Morphological impacts on normalization
Defense gene expression	Fold-change induction, Expression kinetics	High sensitivity, Temporal resolution	Reference gene stability, Pathogen-induced morphological changes
Genotype comparison	Differential expression patterns, Expression magnitude	Identifies candidate resistance genes	Does not establish protein function, Affected by genetic background

Research Reagent Solutions

Table 4: Essential Research Reagents for qRT-PCR and VIGS Experiments

Reagent/Category	Specific Examples	Function/Application	Considerations
RNA Extraction Kits	RNeasy Plant Kit, RNAprep Pure Plant Kit	High-quality RNA isolation from challenging plant tissues	PVP addition recommended for polyphenol-rich species [84] [85]
Reverse Transcription Kits	FastQuant RT Kit, SuperiorScript III	cDNA synthesis with gDNA removal	Include gDNA wipe buffer to eliminate genomic DNA contamination [84]
qPCR Master Mixes	2× SuperReal PreMix Plus, 2× Taq Master Mix	SYBR Green-based detection with optimized buffers	Verify compatibility with instrument and required additives [84]
VIGS Vectors	pTRV1, pTRV2, pNC-TRV2-GFP	TRV-based virus-induced gene silencing	Modified versions available with fluorescent markers [26] [47]
Agrobacterium Strains	GV3101, LBA4404	Delivery of VIGS constructs into plant tissues	Optimization required for OD600 and acetosyringone concentration [26] [66]

qRT-PCR technology provides an indispensable toolset for validating VIGS efficiency and analyzing transcriptomic changes in plant NBS gene research. The methodological considerations outlined in this guide—particularly regarding reference gene selection, morphological impacts on data interpretation, and optimized protocols—enable researchers to generate reliable, reproducible data. When properly implemented, the integration of VIGS with qRT-PCR analysis creates a powerful pipeline for functional characterization of NBS genes and their roles in plant defense mechanisms. As these technologies continue to evolve, with improvements in RNA-seq-guided normalization and expanded VIGS applications in recalcitrant species, their combined power will accelerate the discovery and validation of disease resistance genes for crop improvement.

In the functional validation of plant Nucleotide-Binding Site-Leucine Rich Repeat (NBS-LRR) genes, protein-level interaction studies with pathogen effectors represent a critical step for deciphering the molecular basis of disease resistance. These validation experiments confirm the physical binding between host resistance proteins and pathogen-encoded molecules, such as viral coat proteins (CP), providing mechanistic insights into effector-triggered immunity (ETI) [2]. Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) has emerged as a powerful tool for rapid, high-throughput functional screening of candidate NBS genes in plants recalcitrant to stable transformation [87] [39]. This guide objectively compares the performance of leading VIGS vector systems for protein-level validation studies, providing experimental data and methodologies to inform research design.

Comparative Analysis of VIGS Vector Systems for Validation Studies

Table 1: Performance Comparison of Major VIGS Vector Systems

Vector System	Virus Type / Family	Optimal Insert Size	Key Advantages	Documented Validation Efficiency	Primary Applications in Validation
CFMMV-based (pCF93)	Tobamovirus	200-300 bp [87]	High efficiency in cucurbits; suitable for large-scale screening [87]	Silenced 8/38 candidate male sterility genes in watermelon [87]	Functional validation of reproductive gene candidates [87]
30K Family MP Vectors	Multiple genera (AMV, CMV, TMV)	45-54 bp (for high efficiency) [88]	Tunable silencing level; wide host range; partial silencing viable for essential genes [88]	~45% (21-39 nt) to 75-90% (≥45 nt) silencing of PDS [88]	Calibratable gene silencing; functional analysis across diverse plant species [88]
LIYV-derived	Crinivirus	~1.8 kb (large capacity) [89]	Large insert capacity; whitefly transmissible; phloem-limited [89]	Effective GFP and PDS silencing in N. benthamiana [89]	Protein expression and silencing; vector transmission studies [89]
TRV-based	Tobravirus	100-500 bp [39]	Broad Solanaceae host range; targets meristematic tissues; mild symptoms [39]	Widely successful in pepper, tomato, N. benthamiana [39]	High-throughput screening of disease resistance and developmental genes [39]

Table 2: Technical Specifications and Experimental Considerations

Parameter	CFMMV Vector	30K Family MP Vectors	LIYV Vector	TRV Vector
Delivery Method	Agroinoculation [87]	Agroinoculation [88]	Agroinoculation or whitefly transmission [89]	Agroinfiltration [39]
Silencing Onset	Not specified	Correlated with insert size [88]	Not specified	Rapid (within 1-2 weeks) [39]
Key Limitations	Limited to cucurbit hosts [87]	Smaller insert sizes required [88]	More complex bipartite genome [89]	Potential symptom development in some hosts [39]
Optimal Temperature	Not specified	Not specified	Not specified	19-22°C for maximal efficiency [39]

VIGS Workflow for Protein-Level Validation of NBS Genes

The following diagram illustrates the generalized experimental workflow for validating NBS gene function through VIGS-mediated silencing and subsequent protein-level interaction studies with pathogen effectors.

Diagram 1: Generalized workflow for VIGS-mediated validation of NBS gene function, incorporating protein-level interaction studies with pathogen effectors. The red-dashed boxes indicate key molecular validation steps that provide quantitative data on silencing efficiency and protein interactions.

Detailed Experimental Protocols for Key Methodologies

VIGS Vector Construction and Agroinfiltration

The development of VIGS vectors for protein validation studies requires strategic insertion of target gene fragments. For the CFMMV-based pCF93 vector, researchers amplify 200-300 bp fragments of candidate genes and clone them into the vector backbone, followed by transformation into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 [87]. Agroinfiltration is performed on plants at the 4-6 leaf stage using bacterial suspensions with optical densities optimized for the specific host species [89] [39].

For 30K family movement protein vectors, a novel approach involves in-frame insertion of small target sequences (18-54 bp) directly into the MP coding sequence between specific amino acid residues (e.g., P256 and S257 in AMV MP). This strategy enables calibration of silencing efficiency based on insert size, with fragments ≥45 nucleotides achieving 75-90% silencing efficiency [88].

Validation of Silencing Efficiency and Phenotype Analysis

Confirmation of successful gene silencing is critical before protein interaction studies. Reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) provides quantitative assessment of silencing efficiency. Total RNA is extracted from systemic leaves using TRIzol reagent, treated with DNase to remove genomic DNA contamination, and first-strand cDNA synthesized using reverse transcriptase [87] [89]. qPCR reactions are performed with gene-specific primers, with silencing efficiency calculated using the 2^(-ΔΔCt) method relative to non-silenced controls.

Phenotypic validation is particularly important for NBS genes involved in pathogen recognition. For example, in a study of cotton NBS genes, GaNBS (OG2) was silenced using VIGS in resistant cotton, which demonstrated its putative role in virus titering and validated its function in disease resistance [2].

Protein-Level Interaction Studies with Pathogen Effectors

Following successful VIGS-mediated silencing, protein-level interactions between NBS proteins and pathogen effectors can be validated through multiple approaches:

Co-Immunoprecipitation (Co-IP): This method confirms physical interaction between NBS proteins and pathogen effectors in planta. Tissues from VIGS-silenced and control plants are harvested and proteins extracted using appropriate lysis buffers. Protein complexes are immunoprecipitated using specific antibodies against the NBS protein or tagged effectors, followed by western blot analysis to detect co-precipitated interaction partners [2].

Yeast Two-Hybrid Analysis: This system provides complementary evidence for direct protein-effector interactions. The NBS gene is cloned into a DNA-binding domain vector, while the pathogen effector gene (e.g., viral coat protein) is cloned into an activation domain vector. Both constructs are co-transformed into yeast cells, with protein-protein interactions confirmed through growth on selective media and reporter gene activation [2].

Protein-Ligand Interaction Studies: Computational and in vitro approaches can further validate interactions. Molecular docking analyses predict binding affinities between NBS proteins and pathogen effectors, which can be confirmed through surface plasmon resonance or isothermal titration calorimetry that quantitatively measure interaction kinetics and stoichiometry [2].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 3: Key Research Reagents for VIGS-Based Protein Validation Studies

Reagent / Material	Function / Application	Examples / Specifications
VIGS Vectors	Delivery of target gene fragments to induce silencing	pCF93 (CFMMV-based), TRV1/TRV2, LIYV RNA1/RNA2, 30K MP-modified vectors [87] [89] [88]
Agrobacterium Strains	Delivery of VIGS constructs into plant tissues	GV3101 for agroinfiltration [89]
Viral Suppressors of RNAi (VSRs)	Enhancement of VIGS efficiency by countering host defenses	P19, HC-Pro, C2b [39]
Antibodies	Detection of target proteins and interaction partners in Co-IP	Specific to NBS proteins, viral coat proteins, or protein tags [2]
RNA Extraction Kits	Isolation of high-quality RNA for silencing validation	TRIzol-based protocols [87] [89]
Reverse Transcriptase Kits	cDNA synthesis for RT-qPCR analysis	SuperScript II/III systems [89]

VIGS-based approaches provide researchers with versatile tools for protein-level validation of NBS gene interactions with pathogen effectors. The optimal vector system depends on multiple factors, including host plant species, desired silencing efficiency, insert size requirements, and experimental timeframe. CFMMV vectors excel in cucurbit species, 30K MP vectors offer tunable silencing across diverse hosts, LIYV vectors accommodate larger inserts, and TRV systems provide broad Solanaceae compatibility. By following the detailed experimental workflows and utilizing the appropriate research reagents outlined in this guide, researchers can effectively design and implement robust protein-level validation studies to advance our understanding of plant-pathogen interactions and support the development of disease-resistant crops.

The functional validation of plant nucleotide-binding site (NBS) genes is crucial for understanding disease resistance mechanisms and developing durable crop protection strategies. This case study examines the functional confirmation of GaNBS, a candidate NBS-LRR gene from the orthogroup OG2, in conferring resistance to Cotton Leaf Curl Disease (CLCuD) [90]. CLCuD, caused by a complex of begomoviruses transmitted by the whitefly Bemisia tabaci, poses a significant threat to global cotton production, with documented yield losses ranging from 15% to 70% in severe infections [91]. The study employed Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) as a key reverse genetics tool to elucidate the role of GaNBS, demonstrating how this methodology accelerates gene function analysis in a complex polyploid crop [90] [92].

Background and Significance

Cotton Leaf Curl Disease Complex

CLCuD is associated with multiple begomovirus species, including Cotton leaf curl Multan virus (CLCuMuV) and Cotton leaf curl Kokhran virus (CLCuKoV), which are often accompanied by alphasatellites and the betasatellite Cotton leaf curl Multan betasatellite (CLCuMuB) [91]. The disease manifests through distinctive symptoms such as upward or downward leaf curling, vein thickening, and enations on the abaxial side of leaves, which can develop into leaf-like structures [91]. The emergence of resistance-breaking strains, particularly the Burewala strain, has rendered previously resistant cotton cultivars susceptible, necessitating the identification of new resistance genes [91].

NBS-LRR Genes in Plant Immunity

NBS-LRR genes constitute the largest family of plant disease resistance (R) genes, encoding intracellular immune receptors that detect pathogen effectors and initiate effector-triggered immunity (ETI) [3] [90] [5]. These proteins typically feature a conserved nucleotide-binding site (NBS) domain and a C-terminal leucine-rich repeat (LRR) domain [3] [5]. Based on their N-terminal domains, they are classified into:

• TNLs: Containing a Toll/Interleukin-1 receptor (TIR) domain
• CNLs: Containing a Coiled-Coil (CC) domain
• RNLs: Containing a Resistance to Powdery Mildew8 (RPW8) domain [3] [24]

The NBS-LRR gene family demonstrates significant diversity and expansion across plant species, with studies identifying 156 members in Nicotiana benthamiana [3], 269 in eggplant [24], and 12,820 across 34 land plant species [90].

Experimental Methodology

Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) Platform

VIGS is an RNA interference-based technique that utilizes recombinant viral vectors to trigger sequence-specific post-transcriptional gene silencing (PTGS) of endogenous plant genes [39] [92]. The methodology leverages the plant's innate antiviral defense mechanism: when a recombinant virus containing a fragment of a host gene infects the plant, the system processes the viral double-stranded RNA replication intermediates into small interfering RNAs (siRNAs). These siRNAs are incorporated into the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), which guides the degradation of complementary endogenous mRNA transcripts, leading to knockdown of the target gene [39].

For the functional study of GaNBS, researchers utilized a VIGS system, likely based on either the Tobacco Rattle Virus (TRV) or Cotton Leaf Crumple Virus (CLCrV) vector, both established for cotton [92]. The typical workflow involves:

• Clone a fragment (typically 200-500 bp) of the target GaNBS gene into the VIGS vector
• Transform the recombinant vector into Agrobacterium tumefaciens
• Infiltrate cotton seedlings with the agrobacterial culture
• Wait for systemic silencing to establish (typically 2-3 weeks post-inoculation)
• Challenge silenced plants with CLCuD via graft inoculation or viruliferous whiteflies
• Evaluate disease symptoms and viral titers compared to control plants [90] [92]

Key Research Reagents and Solutions

Table 1: Essential Research Reagents for VIGS-Based Functional Validation

Reagent/Solution	Function/Application	Specific Examples
VIGS Vectors	Delivery of host gene fragments to trigger RNAi	TRV (RNA virus), CLCrV (DNA begomovirus) [39] [92]
Agrobacterium tumefaciens	Biological vector for plant transformation	GV3101, LBA4404 strains [39]
Visual Marker Genes	Monitoring silencing efficiency	CLA1 (chloroplast development), PDS (carotenoid biosynthesis) [92]
Inoculation Media	Agroinfiltration support	LB broth, induction media (acetosyringone, MES buffer) [39]
Pathogen Inoculum	Disease challenge	CLCuD-infected plant tissue, viruliferous whiteflies [91]
Detection Assays	Measuring viral accumulation and gene expression	qRT-PCR, ELISA [90]

Results and Functional Validation

The core finding of the study revealed that silencing of GaNBS in resistant cotton led to increased virus accumulation, demonstrating its essential role in the resistance mechanism [90]. Specifically, when GaNBS expression was knocked down via VIGS, the previously resistant cotton plants showed significantly higher viral titers upon challenge with CLCuD, comparable to susceptible genotypes [90]. This functional impairment of resistance in GaNBS-silenced plants provided direct evidence that this NBS-LRR gene is a key mediator of defense against the cotton leaf curl virus complex.

Table 2: Comparative Analysis of CLCuD Response in GaNBS-Silenced vs. Control Plants

Parameter	Resistant Control (Non-Silenced)	GaNBS-Silenced	Susceptible Control
Disease Symptoms	No or minimal symptoms	Severe leaf curling, vein thickening	Severe leaf curling, vein thickening, enations [90] [91]
Viral Titer	Low	High	High [90]
GaNBS Expression	High	Significantly reduced	Variable (potentially low or non-functional) [90]
Plant Growth	Normal	Stunted, reduced internodal length	Stunted, reduced internodal length [91]

This functional validation positioned GaNBS within orthogroup OG2, which transcriptome profiling identified as being upregulated in different tissues under various biotic and abiotic stresses in both susceptible and CLCuD-tolerant cotton plants [90]. The genetic variation analysis between susceptible (Coker 312) and tolerant (Mac7) Gossypium hirsutum accessions further supported the importance of this gene, revealing 6583 unique variants in NBS genes of Mac7 compared to 5173 in Coker312 [90].

Comparative Analysis with Other NBS-LRR Gene Validation Studies

The approach used to validate GaNBS aligns with established methodologies for characterizing NBS-LRR genes across various plant-virus pathosystems. The following comparative analysis highlights key studies:

Table 3: Comparative Analysis of NBS-LRR Gene Validation in Crop Virus Resistance

Gene	Crop	Pathogen	Validation Method	Key Finding	Reference
GaNBS (OG2)	Cotton	CLCuD (Begomovirus)	VIGS	Silencing increased viral titer, confirming resistance role	[90]
Ym1	Wheat	WYMV (Bymovirus)	Map-based cloning, overexpression	CC-NBS-LRR protein interacts with viral CP, triggers HR	[7]
Glyma02g13380	Soybean	SMV (Potyvirus)	VIGS, qRT-PCR	Confers dual resistance to SC4 and SC20 strains	[28]
Vm019719	Tung tree	Fusarium wilt (Fungus)	VIGS	Confers resistance to Fusarium wilt; regulated by VmWRKY64	[5]

This comparative analysis reveals that VIGS has become a cornerstone technique for the rapid functional characterization of NBS-LRR genes across diverse crops, particularly in complex genomes where stable transformation remains challenging [39] [90] [92]. The case of GaNBS shares particular similarity with Ym1 in wheat, another CNL-type gene that confers resistance to a soil-borne virus (Wheat yellow mosaic virus, WYMV) [7]. Ym1 was found to be specifically expressed in roots and to recognize the viral coat protein, leading to hypersensitive response and blocking of viral systemic movement [7].

Technical Diagrams

VIGS Mechanism for NBS Gene Functional Validation

NBS-LRR Protein Domain Structure and Activation

Discussion and Future Perspectives

The functional confirmation of GaNBS using VIGS represents a significant advancement in understanding the molecular basis of CLCuD resistance. This case study exemplifies how VIGS bridges the gap between genomic sequencing and functional genomics, enabling rapid validation of candidate genes without the need for stable transformation [39] [92]. The transient nature of VIGS is particularly advantageous for studying genes like GaNBS that may have pleiotropic effects on development or fitness if completely knocked out [39].

Future research directions should focus on:

• Elucidating the precise recognition mechanism between GaNBS and CLCuD viral components
• Identifying additional members of the resistance signaling cascade downstream of GaNBS activation
• Pyramiding GaNBS with other R genes to develop durable, broad-spectrum resistance
• Exploring natural variation in GaNBS across cotton germplasm to identify superior alleles for breeding

The integration of VIGS with emerging technologies like CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing and multi-omics approaches will further accelerate the discovery and deployment of NBS-LRR genes in crop improvement programs [39]. As demonstrated by the GaNBS case study, this powerful combination provides a roadmap for systematic functional validation of plant immune receptors, ultimately contributing to the development of sustainable disease management strategies.

Nucleotide-binding site (NBS) genes represent the largest family of plant disease resistance (R) genes, playing a crucial role in effector-triggered immunity against diverse pathogens. The identification and functional validation of these genes remain challenging due to their extensive diversification across plant genomes. This guide examines how orthogroup analysis, a comparative genomics approach, provides a powerful framework for prioritizing candidate NBS genes for downstream functional studies. By integrating evolutionary classification with expression profiling and genetic variation data, researchers can systematically identify core NBS orthogroups with potential disease resistance functions. We present experimental evidence demonstrating how virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) validates the role of prioritized NBS genes, with particular focus on applications in cotton and soybean pathosystems. The structured integration of orthogroup analysis with functional validation protocols offers researchers a streamlined pipeline for accelerating R gene discovery and characterization.

The Plant NBS Gene Family

Plant NBS-LRR proteins constitute one of the largest and most diverse gene families involved in pathogen recognition and defense signaling. These proteins are characterized by a conserved nucleotide-binding site (NBS) domain and C-terminal leucine-rich repeats (LRRs), with variable N-terminal domains defining major subfamilies: TIR-NBS-LRR (TNL), CC-NBS-LRR (CNL), and RPW8-NBS-LRR (RNL) [93] [94]. The NBS domain functions as a molecular switch, binding and hydrolyzing ATP/GTP to activate defense signaling cascades, while the LRR domain is primarily involved in pathogen recognition [1]. This gene family has undergone extensive expansion through various duplication mechanisms, resulting in significant interspecific and intraspecific variation that complicates traditional gene identification approaches [2] [94].

Orthogroup Analysis Fundamentals

Orthogroup analysis represents a phylogenetic approach to gene classification that identifies groups of genes descended from a single gene in the last common ancestor of the species being compared. The OrthoFinder algorithm implements this approach through a multi-step process: (1) identification of sequence similarities using DIAMOND or BLAST, (2) clustering of genes into orthogroups using the MCL algorithm, (3) inference of gene trees for each orthogroup, (4) identification of gene duplication events, and (5) comprehensive comparative genomics statistics generation [95]. This method provides significant advantages over pairwise ortholog identification by contextualizing genes within their evolutionary frameworks, enabling researchers to distinguish between lineage-specific expansions and conserved gene families.

Orthogroup Analysis Methodology for NBS Genes

Identification and Classification Pipeline

Table 1: Key Tools for NBS Gene Identification and Orthogroup Analysis

Tool Name	Primary Function	Application in NBS Analysis	Key Reference
OrthoFinder	Phylogenetic orthology inference	Identifies orthogroups across multiple species	[95]
PfamScan	Domain identification	Detects NB-ARC domains using HMM models	[2]
MEME Suite	Motif analysis	Identifies conserved motifs in NBS domains	[93]
PlantTribes2	Gene family classification	Sorts sequences into pre-computed orthologous clusters	[96]
DIAMOND	Sequence similarity search	Accelerates all-vs-all sequence comparisons	[95]

A robust orthogroup analysis begins with comprehensive identification of NBS-domain-containing genes across target species. The standard workflow utilizes PfamScan with the NB-ARC domain model (PF00931) at a stringent e-value cutoff (1.1e-50) to identify candidate NBS genes [2]. Subsequent classification incorporates identification of associated domains (TIR, CC, LRR, RPW8) using the NCBI Conserved Domain Database and coiled-coil prediction tools. This multi-domain analysis enables categorization of NBS genes into classical and species-specific structural patterns, revealing significant diversity among plant species [2]. In a recent study analyzing 34 plant species, this approach identified 12,820 NBS-domain-containing genes classified into 168 distinct architectural classes, demonstrating the extensive diversification of this gene family [2].

Evolutionary Analysis and Duplication Detection

Orthogroup analysis enables systematic tracking of NBS gene evolution through identification of duplication events and selective pressures. The OrthoFinder algorithm employs DendroBLAST for gene tree inference and reconciles these with species trees to identify gene duplication events [95]. This analysis typically reveals that NBS genes evolve through both whole-genome duplication (WGD) and small-scale duplication (SSD) events, with tandem duplications playing a particularly significant role in generating sequence diversity [2] [93]. Evolutionary analysis often identifies heterogeneous selection pressures across NBS protein domains, with the LRR region exhibiting signatures of diversifying selection that maintains variation in solvent-exposed residues, consistent with its role in pathogen recognition [94].

Figure 1: Orthogroup analysis workflow for prioritizing NBS candidate genes, from multi-species sequence input to functional validation.

Prioritization Strategies for Candidate NBS Genes

Orthogroup Conservation Patterns

Orthogroup analysis facilitates candidate prioritization through identification of evolutionary patterns across species. Core orthogroups, which contain genes conserved across multiple species, often represent essential components of defense signaling pathways. In contrast, species-specific orthogroups may reflect recent adaptations to lineage-specific pathogens [2]. A comprehensive analysis of 34 plant species identified 603 NBS orthogroups, with certain core orthogroups (OG0, OG1, OG2) present across diverse species, while others (OG80, OG82) exhibited high species specificity [2]. This evolutionary conservation provides valuable criteria for prioritizing candidates based on research objectives—whether targeting fundamental defense mechanisms or species-specific resistance traits.

Expression Profiling Integration

Table 2: Expression Patterns of Select NBS Orthogroups in Cotton Under Stress Conditions

Orthogroup	Expression in CLCuD-Tolerant	Expression in CLCuD-Susceptible	Proposed Function
OG2	Upregulated	Downregulated	Putative virus tittering
OG6	Upregulated	Unchanged	Biotic stress response
OG15	Upregulated	Downregulated	Abiotic stress cross-talk
OG80	Variable	Variable	Species-specific defense

Integration of transcriptomic data enables functional prioritization of NBS orthogroups based on their expression patterns across tissues and stress conditions. Methodologies include retrieval of RNA-seq data from public databases (IPF, CottonFGD, Cottongen) and processing through standardized transcriptomic pipelines to generate FPKM values [2]. These datasets should be categorized into tissue-specific, abiotic stress-specific, and biotic stress-specific expression profiles. In a case study analyzing cotton response to cotton leaf curl disease (CLCuD), researchers identified orthogroups OG2, OG6, and OG15 as showing putative upregulation in different tissues under various biotic and abiotic stresses in both susceptible and tolerant plants [2]. Such expression patterns provide strong evidence for involvement in defense responses and help prioritize candidates for functional validation.

Genetic Variation Analysis

Analysis of sequence variation between resistant and susceptible genotypes provides another prioritization criterion by identifying potential functional polymorphisms. This approach involves whole-genome sequencing of contrasting accessions and mapping variants to NBS gene models. In a comparison between susceptible (Coker 312) and tolerant (Mac7) Gossypium hirsutum accessions, researchers identified significantly more unique variants in NBS genes of the tolerant genotype (6,583 variants) compared to the susceptible (5,173 variants) [2]. These variants, particularly non-synonymous substitutions in functional domains, highlight candidate genes potentially contributing to the resistant phenotype and deserving further investigation.

Functional Validation Through VIGS

VIGS Methodology for NBS Gene Validation

Virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) provides a powerful reverse genetics approach for rapidly validating candidate NBS gene function. This technique utilizes modified viral vectors to deliver gene-specific fragments that trigger sequence-specific mRNA degradation, effectively knocking down target gene expression [26]. The tobacco rattle virus (TRV)-based VIGS system has been optimized for various crops, with recent advancements demonstrating efficacy in soybean through Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated infection of cotyledon nodes [26]. This method achieves systemic silencing throughout the plant with efficiency ranging from 65% to 95%, inducing significant phenotypic changes suitable for functional characterization [26].

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents for VIGS-Based NBS Gene Validation

Reagent/Tool	Specifications	Function in Experiment
pTRV1 Vector	TRV RNA1 replicon	Provides viral replication machinery
pTRV2-GFP Vector	TRV RNA2 with GFP marker	Carries target gene insert for silencing
Agrobacterium GV3101	Transformation-ready strain	Delivers TRV vectors into plant cells
EcoRI/XhoI	Restriction enzymes	Cloning of target gene fragments
Gene-specific primers	18-24 bp with adapter sequences	Amplification of target gene fragments

Case Study: Validation of GaNBS (OG2) in Cotton

A compelling example of orthogroup-informed VIGS validation comes from the functional analysis of GaNBS from orthogroup OG2 in cotton. Following orthogroup analysis that identified OG2 as a core orthogroup with upregulated expression in CLCuD-tolerant genotypes, researchers cloned a 300bp fragment from GaNBS into the pTRV2 vector [2]. Silencing of GaNBS in resistant cotton plants resulted in increased viral titers and symptom development following CLCuD infection, confirming its essential role in virus resistance [2]. This validation demonstrates the power of integrating orthogroup analysis with targeted VIGS for confirming gene function, particularly for complex traits like disease resistance.

Figure 2: VIGS experimental workflow for functional validation of candidate NBS genes prioritized through orthogroup analysis.

Soybean VIGS Optimization

Recent methodological advances have addressed previous limitations in VIGS application to soybean, a crop with technical challenges due to its thick cuticle and dense trichomes. The optimized protocol involves bisecting surface-sterilized soybeans to obtain half-seed explants, then infecting fresh explants by immersion in Agrobacterium suspensions containing either pTRV1 or pTRV2 derivatives for 20-30 minutes [26]. This approach achieves transformation efficiencies exceeding 80%, with successful infection confirmed through GFP fluorescence microscopy [26]. The system has been successfully applied to silence key soybean genes including GmPDS (resulting in photobleaching), the rust resistance gene GmRpp6907, and the defense-related gene GmRPT4, establishing its robustness for functional validation of NBS candidates in legume systems [26].

Comparative Analysis of NBS Gene Families

Cross-Species Patterns in NBS Gene Evolution

Orthogroup analysis reveals striking evolutionary patterns across plant lineages, including significant variation in NBS gene family size and composition. While basal land plants like mosses and lycophytes possess relatively small NLR repertoires (approximately 25 NLRs in Physcomitrella patens), flowering plants exhibit extensive expansions, with some species containing thousands of NBS genes [2] [94]. An analysis of Akebia trifoliata identified only 73 NBS genes in its genome, with uneven distribution across chromosomes and clustering at chromosome ends [93]. The composition of NBS subfamilies also varies dramatically between species; for example, Dioscorea rotundata possesses 166 CNLs but only one RNL and no TNLs, while Brassica napus contains 461 TNLs and 180 CNLs but no RNLs [93]. These distribution patterns reflect lineage-specific adaptations and diversification in response to distinct pathogen pressures.

Protein Interaction Networks

Beyond sequence-based analysis, protein interaction studies provide functional insights into prioritized NBS candidates. Protein-ligand and protein-protein interaction assays demonstrate strong binding of putative NBS proteins with ADP/ATP, consistent with their role as molecular switches in defense signaling [2]. Additionally, interaction studies with pathogen proteins can reveal recognition mechanisms; for example, some NBS proteins directly bind pathogen effectors, while others guard host proteins that are modified by pathogen virulence factors [1]. These functional characteristics provide additional criteria for prioritizing candidate NBS genes emerging from orthogroup analyses.

Orthogroup analysis represents a powerful framework for navigating the complexity and diversity of plant NBS gene families. By integrating evolutionary relationships with expression data and genetic variation, researchers can systematically prioritize candidates with greater potential for functional significance in disease resistance. The subsequent validation of these candidates through optimized VIGS protocols creates an efficient pipeline for R gene characterization, accelerating the development of improved crop varieties with enhanced disease resistance. As genomic resources continue to expand across plant species, orthogroup analysis will play an increasingly vital role in translating sequence information into biological understanding and agricultural applications.

Conclusion

The integration of VIGS for functional validation of NBS genes represents a powerful and rapid approach to bridge the gap between genomic sequencing and actionable biological insight in plant immunity. This methodology enables researchers to move from in silico candidate lists to confirmed resistance genes, as demonstrated in crops like soybean, pepper, and cotton. Future directions will focus on refining VIGS for high-throughput screening, combining it with CRISPR-Cas9 for complementary validation, and leveraging multi-omics data to build predictive models of NBS gene function. This synergy between functional genomics and molecular pathology will significantly accelerate the development of durable, disease-resistant crop varieties, contributing to global food security.

References

• 1. Plant NBS-LRR proteins in pathogen sensing and host defense [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1973153/]
• 2. Comparative analysis, diversification, and functional ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-62876-5]
• 3. Genome-wide identification and characterization of NBS ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-03507-5]
• 4. Functional characterization of NBS-LRR genes reveals an ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10898138/]
• 5. Functional characterization of NBS-LRR genes reveals an ... [https://bmcbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12915-024-01836-x]
• 6. Interaction between domains of a plant NBS–LRR protein in ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC126192/]
• 7. A wheat CC-NBS-LRR protein Ym1 confers WYMV resistance ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12003722/]
• 8. A novel hairpin library-based approach to identify NBS–LRR ... [https://plantmethods.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13007-017-0181-7]
• 9. Identification and functional validation of a new gene ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2024.1518829/full]
• 10. Functional Study on the Regulation of Lignin Formation ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S098194282500837X]
• 11. Genome-Wide Identification and Functional Evolution of NLR ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12562843/]
• 12. Plant NLRs: The Whistleblowers of Plant Immunity - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7747998/]
• 13. DaapNLRSeek, prediction, and evolution of resistance ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004225011307]
• 14. Comparative-genomic analysis reveals dynamic NLR gene ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/genetics/articles/10.3389/fgene.2023.1141194/full]
• 15. Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) for Functional ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30460561/]
• 16. A high-throughput virus-induced gene silencing protocol ... [https://bmcplantbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2229-13-193]
• 17. Comparative analysis, diversification, and functional ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38789717/]
• 18. Do duplication-inducing elements 'cooperate' with genes in ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12573847/]
• 19. Tandem and segmental gene duplication and ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0168952504000228]
• 20. Evolutionary Conservation and Pre-Activated Immunity of ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1656786/full]
• 21. Profiling of gene duplication patterns of sequenced teleost genomes... [https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-13-246]
• 22. Virus-induced gene silencing for in planta validation of ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35944218/]
• 23. Cloning and Functional Validation of the Candidate Gene ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/14/1561]
• 24. Genome-Wide Analysis Revealed NBS-LRR Gene ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/13/10/2583]
• 25. Dramatic Number Variation of R Genes in Solanaceae ... [https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0148708]
• 26. Efficient Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) Method for ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12115190/]
• 27. A wheat CC-NBS-LRR protein Ym1 confers WYMV ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-58816-0]
• 28. Identification and functional validation of a new gene ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11811538/]
• 29. Transcriptome Analysis of Eggplant Root in Response to ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8069755/]
• 30. A high-quality chromosome-level genome assembly ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7506008/]
• 31. A chromosome-anchored eggplant genome sequence ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-47985-w]
• 32. The Elaboration of miRNA Regulation and Gene Regulatory ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6523410/]
• 33. The microRNA miR482 regulates NBS-LRR genes in ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0168945224001055]
• 34. New insight into the molecular mechanism of miR482/2118 ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.1026762/full]
• 35. Function identification of miR482b, a negative regulator ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41438-018-0017-2]
• 36. Cotton RSG2 Mediates Plant Resistance against ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2079-7737/12/7/898]
• 37. MicroRNA482/2118 is lineage‐specifically involved in ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10955497/]
• 38. Analysis of the miR482 Gene Family in Plants - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11353999/]
• 39. Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) in Functional Genomics [https://www.mdpi.com/2311-7524/11/11/1297]
• 40. Developing and applying a virus-induced gene silencing ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378111924009685]
• 41. Temporal and spatial Bean pod mottle virus‐induced gene ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6638800/]
• 42. Plant Virus-Derived Vectors for Plant Genome Engineering [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9958682/]
• 43. Viral Vectors for Plant Genome Engineering [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2017.00539/full]
• 44. Virus-induced Phytoene Desaturase (PDS) Gene Silencing ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468014118302516]
• 45. Binary vector copy number engineering improves ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41587-024-02462-2]
• 46. based virus-induced gene Silencing in Atriplex canescens [https://plantmethods.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13007-025-01427-z]
• 47. Development of a robust and efficient virus-induced gene ... [https://plantmethods.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13007-024-01320-1]
• 48. Developing and applying a virus-induced gene silencing ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39542283/]
• 49. Agroinfiltration technique for elucidating the functions of ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-08344-0]
• 50. Integrating cotyledon-based virus-induced gene silencing ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11790630/]
• 51. A Cotyledon-based Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (Cotyledon ... [https://plantmethods.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13007-024-01154-x]
• 52. A Cotyledon-based Virus-Induced Gene Silencing ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38347628/]
• 53. Establishment of a Virus-Induced Gene-Silencing (VIGS) ... [https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/24/1/392]
• 54. A cowpea severe mosaic virus-based vector ... - Plant Methods [https://plantmethods.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13007-022-00950-7]
• 55. Virus-induced gene silencing shows that LATE ... [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10725-022-00899-6]
• 56. A Cotton Laccase Confers Disease Resistance Against ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12257636/]
• 57. Strategies, mechanisms, and innovations in gene pyramiding [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0885576525002097]
• 58. Optimizing core collections for genetic studies: a worldwide ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1675815/full]
• 59. Efficient Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) Method for ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/14/10/1547]
• 60. Advancing virus-induced gene silencing in sunflower: key factors of... [https://plantmethods.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13007-024-01241-z]
• 61. Visible gland constantly traces virus-induced gene ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.1020841/full]
• 62. Frontiers | Integrating cotyledon-based virus-induced gene silencing... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2024.1514614/full]
• 63. Efficient Virus-Induced Gene Silencing in Arabidopsis - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1557620/]
• 64. Development of a robust and efficient virus-induced gene ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39754266/]
• 65. Efficient Virus-Induced Gene Silencing in Ilex ... [https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/14/3/488]
• 66. an efficient virus induced gene silencing (VIGS) system [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468014123000833]
• 67. A rapid, simple, and highly efficient method for VIGS and in ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8605592/]
• 68. Low Agrobacterium tumefaciens inoculum levels and a ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5042984/]
• 69. A simple and efficient protocol for generating transgenic ... [https://www.protocols.io/view/a-simple-and-efficient-protocol-for-generating-tra-cnbnvame.html]
• 70. Identification and functional characterization of anaphase ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468014125001797]
• 71. The Two Tomato Ubiquitin E1 Enzymes Play Unequal Roles ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12477439/]
• 72. Establishment of virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10470258/]
• 73. Off-target interactions in the CRISPR-Cas9 Machinery [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40688512/]
• 74. Development of Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) and ... [https://dineshkumar.ucdavis.edu/research/development-virus-induced-gene-silencing-vigs-and-crisprcas9-mediated-genome-editing-approaches]
• 75. Transcriptome profiling of pepper leaves by RNA-Seq ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-00002-5]
• 76. The plant hypersensitive response: concepts, control and ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6640183/]
• 77. Evaluation of disease burden and response to treatment in adults with... [https://ojrd.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13023-015-0280-3]
• 78. A quick and robust method for quantification of ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4699783/]
• 79. Derivation, Validation , and Potential Treatment Implications of Novel... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31104070/]
• 80. Hypersensitive-like response in Brassica plants is ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/ecology-and-evolution/articles/10.3389/fevo.2022.1070859/full]
• 81. Use of virus‐induced gene silencing to characterize genes ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7694674/]
• 82. A stable combination of non-stable genes outperforms ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11682138/]
• 83. Comparative Analysis of Gene Expression Level by ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3364230/]
• 84. Evaluation and validation of suitable reference genes for ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-61806-9]
• 85. Transcriptome analysis reveals key defense genes associated ... [https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12864-025-12056-0]
• 86. Genetic Analysis of NBS-LRR Gene Family in Chickpea ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2017.00838/full]
• 87. Virus-induced gene silencing for in planta validation of ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9706489/]
• 88. Engineering VIGS Vectors by Modifying Movement ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11664229/]
• 89. Efficient Protein Expression and Virus-Induced Gene ... [https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/10/5/216]
• 90. Comparative analysis, diversification, and functional ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11126693/]
• 91. Genetic inheritance and resistance patterns of cotton leaf ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2452014425001463]
• 92. Applications of Virus-Induced Gene Silencing in Cotton [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10819639/]
• 93. Identification and Characterization of NBS Resistance ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8585750/]
• 94. Plant NBS-LRR proteins: adaptable guards - Genome Biology [https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/gb-2006-7-4-212]
• 95. OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative ... [https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13059-019-1832-y]
• 96. Tools for comparative gene family analysis in plant genomics [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36798801/]