How Swedish Gotlands Are Restoring Biodiversity
Imagine a solution to biodiversity loss that doesn't require heavy machinery, chemical treatments, or constant human intervention.
Instead, picture sturdy, primitive ponies peacefully grazing across landscapes, simultaneously restoring plant diversity while creating habitats for pollinators—all as part of their natural behavior. This isn't a futuristic vision but the reality of an innovative Swedish conservation project that employs native Gotland ponies as ecological engineers to restore threatened landscapes.
These hardy animals represent a sustainable approach to addressing the alarming decline of natural pastures in Sweden, which has posed a serious threat to red-listed wildlife species 1 . What makes this approach particularly compelling is its dual benefit: while the ponies actively restore biodiversity, researchers carefully monitor whether this extensive management method actually safeguards the welfare of the equine conservationists themselves 7 .
The Gotland pony, or 'Gotlandsruss,' holds the distinction of being Sweden's only native pony breed, with documented presence dating back to the Stone Age 2 . These primitive ponies originally roamed freely on the island of Gotland in the Baltic Sea, possibly from the Iron Age until the early 19th century 1 .
Known in Old Norse as 'hross' and sometimes called 'Skogruss' (little horse of the woods) or 'Skogsbaggar' (forest rams), their history is intertwined with the Goths, who used them for draft, driving, and transport as early as 1800 BCE 2 .
Standing 11.2-13 hands high and weighing 550-650 pounds, they are light yet sturdy with pronounced withers, a deep chest, and strong legs with hard feet 2 .
Their history of living semi-ferally has endowed them with exceptional hardiness, intelligence, and adaptability to harsh climates, including the ability to grow a thick winter coat 1 .
Described as docile and calm, yet athletic enough to be excellent trotters and jumpers 2 .
By the late 1800s, intensive development on Gotland reduced their numbers to fewer than 200 individuals. Through dedicated breeding efforts, the population has recovered to between 6,000-8,000 globally 2 .
Characteristic | Description |
---|---|
Native Name | Gotlandsruss |
Origin | Gotland Island, Sweden |
Adult Height | 11.2-13 hands (115-130 cm) |
Adult Weight | 550-650 lbs (250-300 kg) |
Temperament | Docile, calm, intelligent |
Key Traits | Hardy, athletic, thick winter coat |
Conservation Status | Recovered from near-extinction |
The decline of traditional agriculture in Sweden has led to a significant reduction in natural pastures, creating an urgent need for innovative conservation approaches 1 . When pastures disappear due to agricultural intensification, land abandonment, or modern forestry practices, we lose more than just green spaces—we lose complex ecosystems that support specialized plants, insects, and wildlife 4 .
While wild horses disappeared from southern Sweden at the beginning of the Holocene, feral domestic horses were present for nearly 5,000 years until 1932, leaving an ecological gap that no other species filled 4 .
Traditional conservation methods like mowing cannot replicate the complex ecological effects of large herbivores, which create intermediate disturbances to soil and plants, stimulate growth through selective grazing, and recycle nutrients through their dung and urine 4 .
This is where the concept of rewilding comes into play. Rewilding involves restoring missing ecological functions by reintroducing species that can recreate those natural processes 4 . In Europe, many areas have lost their large herbivores twice over: first through prehistoric extinctions of wild species like aurochs and tarpans, and more recently through the abandonment of traditional livestock grazing 4 .
The "Gotland Pony as a Conservationist" project emerged as a multidisciplinary initiative to address both the biodiversity crisis and the need to conserve the endangered Gotland breed 7 . By deploying these ponies as landscape managers, researchers could investigate whether they could effectively restore grassland ecosystems while maintaining their own welfare under minimal human intervention.
A crucial component of the project involved assessing whether the ponies could maintain good welfare while living extensively without supplementary feed—a requirement for conservation grazing on biologically valuable grasslands where introduced seeds from feed could disrupt native plant communities 7 . This posed a potential conflict with Swedish animal welfare legislation, which normally requires supplementary feeding during winter months 1 .
The research team designed a comprehensive year-long study (May 2014-April 2015) monitoring twelve one-year-old Gotland pony stallions divided into three groups of four, each roaming in enclosures of approximately 10 hectares consisting of about 3 hectares of pasture and 7 hectares of forest .
The enclosures contained natural vegetation types but were not supplemented with additional feed during the trial year .
Researchers conducted monthly welfare assessments using an adapted Horse Welfare Assessment Protocol, evaluating body condition score (BCS), skin condition, coat quality, ocular and nasal discharges, lameness, hoof quality, and general health 1 .
The ponies' reactions to human approach (Human Approach Test) and their tolerance of physical proximity (Avoidance Distance Test) were assessed to gauge their mental state and relationship with humans 7 .
The ponies were equipped with GPS collars to monitor their movement patterns and habitat preferences across different seasons and weather conditions .
Man-made shelters were equipped with motion-sensitive cameras to document how and when the ponies utilized them .
Component | Method | Frequency/Duration |
---|---|---|
Study Period | May 2014 - April 2015 | 12 months |
Subjects | 12 one-year-old Gotland pony stallions | 3 groups of 4 |
Enclosures | ~10 hectares each (3 ha pasture + 7 ha forest) | 3 enclosures |
Physical Assessments | Adapted Horse Welfare Assessment Protocol | Monthly (13 assessments) |
Behavioral Tests | Human Approach Test, Avoidance Distance Test | During assessments |
Movement Tracking | GPS collars | Continuous |
Shelter Use | Motion-sensitive cameras | Continuous |
The welfare assessments revealed a complex picture of how the ponies coped with extensive management across changing seasons. While the ponies generally maintained acceptable welfare during late spring and summer (May-September), researchers identified several important challenges that emerged, particularly during winter months 1 .
The most significant finding concerned body condition score (BCS), which decreased significantly as seasons progressed from fall to winter. The mean BCS was 3.1 in September but dropped to 2.5 by December, with a particularly notable decline between November and December 7 . While no horse fell below the critical threshold (score 2), the downward trend indicated that some individuals struggled to maintain condition during harsh periods 7 .
Parameter | Late Spring/Summer (May-Sept) | Fall/Winter (Oct-Apr) |
---|---|---|
Body Condition | Acceptable (BCS ~3) | Significant decline (BCS ~2.5 by Dec) |
Skin Condition | Generally good | Increased chafing and problems |
Coat Quality | Improving | Continued improvement |
Human Interaction | More positive responses | Increased avoidance, especially in Nov |
Shelter Use | No day-night difference | More daytime use |
Habitat Preference | Preference for pasture | Increased forest usage |
Poor skin condition affected 11 of the 12 horses, while ocular discharge was observed in 7 of the 12 1 . Interestingly, while chafing and skin problems increased toward the study's end, coat condition actually improved 1 .
The ponies showed less interest in human approach during November compared to earlier months, and those with lower body condition scores (BCS < 3) and ocular discharge were more likely to react negatively to human approach 1 .
Higher faecal parasite counts (> 350 eggs per gram) correlated with increased avoidance distance from humans, suggesting a link between health status and behavior 1 .
The ponies used man-made shelters for approximately 48 minutes daily overall, but usage patterns shifted seasonally—shelters were used mostly during daytime in non-vegetative seasons, with no day-night differences in vegetative seasons . This relatively low usage compared to studies of horses in small paddocks likely reflected the ponies' need to spend substantial time foraging in these extensive conditions .
The GPS tracking data revealed fascinating habitat preferences that shifted with conditions: the ponies strongly preferred pasture areas except when snow covered the ground, and forest usage increased during winter as forage became scarce on open pastures . Throughout the year, forests were used more during nighttime than daytime, suggesting these areas provided not just supplemental forage but also security .
While researchers monitored pony welfare, other team members documented the ecological effects of the grazing program. The results demonstrated that the ponies served as powerful agents of ecological restoration, delivering benefits that extended far beyond simple vegetation management.
Grazed plots showed significantly higher plant species richness compared to ungrazed exclusion sites 4 . The horses preferentially consumed certain plants, creating opportunities for other species to establish and thrive.
The grazed areas developed a vegetation community with larger leaf sizes and lower plant height—characteristic of ruderal species adapted to disturbed environments 4 . These functional changes indicate that the ponies were effectively resetting ecological succession.
Perhaps most remarkably, the number of bee and butterfly species observed in grazed plots was significantly higher than in ungrazed areas 4 . Pollinators also spent more time feeding and resting in grazed areas.
These ecological benefits stem from the unique grazing behaviors of horses, which differ from other herbivores in their selective browsing patterns, plant preferences, and creation of microhabitats through their movement and foraging behaviors 1 . Unlike mowing or mechanical brush clearing, horse grazing creates a heterogeneous habitat patchwork with varying vegetation heights and structures that support different wildlife species 4 .
Conducting comprehensive welfare and ecological monitoring requires specialized tools and methods. The research team employed an array of techniques that could serve as a model for similar conservation grazing initiatives worldwide.
Tool/Method | Application | Function in Research |
---|---|---|
Welfare Assessment Protocol | Monthly physical and behavioral evaluation | Standardized monitoring of body condition, skin health, coat quality, injuries |
GPS Collars | Tracking movement patterns | Documenting habitat preferences and seasonal shifts in resource use |
Motion-Sensitive Cameras | Shelter monitoring | Recording duration and circumstances of shelter use without human disturbance |
Human Approach Test | Behavioral assessment | Measuring animal-human relationship and fear responses |
Avoidance Distance Test | Behavioral assessment | Quantifying tolerance of human proximity as welfare indicator |
Body Condition Scoring (BCS) | Physical assessment | Monitoring nutritional status using standardized 5-point scale |
Faecal Analysis | Health monitoring | Assessing parasite loads and their relationship to welfare indicators |
This comprehensive toolkit allowed researchers to gather objective data on both pony welfare and ecological impacts, creating a holistic picture of the conservation grazing system. The welfare assessment protocol proved particularly valuable as an efficient tool for identifying early signs of welfare issues before they became serious problems 1 .
The Gotland pony conservation project offers a compelling model for sustainable landscape management that benefits both biological diversity and an endangered native breed.
The research demonstrates that these hardy ponies can indeed serve as effective ecological engineers, restoring plant diversity and creating valuable pollinator habitats through their natural grazing behaviors 4 . However, the welfare findings underscore that successful extensive management requires more than simply releasing animals into landscapes and hoping for the best.
The project successfully navigates the apparent conflict between conservation requirements (no supplementary feeding to avoid introducing foreign seeds) and animal welfare legislation (mandating winter supplementary feeding) by demonstrating that with proper monitoring and management, Gotland ponies can maintain acceptable welfare year-round, with the recognition that some individuals may need intervention during harsh winters 1 7 .
This innovative approach represents a promising path forward for conservation in an era of limited resources and escalating biodiversity loss. By harnessing the natural behaviors of a native breed, we can restore threatened ecosystems while preserving cultural heritage and maintaining high animal welfare standards—a truly sustainable solution that benefits landscapes, wildlife, and these remarkable pony conservationists alike.